The Indiana Board of Law Examiners executive director has been appointed executive secretary of the Council of Bar Admission
Administrators.
Linda L. Loepker was recently appointed executive secretary of the CBAA until the position is eliminated at end of this year.
She also was reappointed to the CBAA technology committee and the character and fitness committee. Loepker has served on both
committees since 2008.
The CBAA is the principal interface between the council and the National Conference of Bar Examiners. It is composed of bar
examiners and administrators, legal educators, and Supreme Court justices. The technology committee fosters technological
advancements and how they relate to the bar admission process, while the character and fitness committee addresses trends
in character issues of applicants throughout the nation and how individual states approach the trends.
Loepker was appointed executive director of the Indiana Supreme Court’s Board of Law Examiners in 2007. Prior to that,
she worked for the Indiana Supreme Court’s Division of State Court Administration where she was a staff attorney and
then director of Office and Employment Law Services. Loepker graduated with a B.A. from Valparaiso University and received
her J.D. from Thomas M. Cooley Law School. She is licensed to practice in Michigan and Indiana, as well as the federal courts
in each of those states.














The court of appeals not only tries to rewrite or interpret the law to suit their fancy, now they choose play stupid as well. Every consideration must be given to pro se litigants, who are not held to the same standards as attorneys, as stated by,SCOTUS. I assume they didn't have a lawyer, since one wasn't mentioned and I strongly suggest thatb the rest of the, origional petitioners get back in there and fight for their rights.
the irony of situations like this is that the clients whom conour cheated are the ones who should be pulling hardest for him to remain free and keep his law license, so they have some hopes of him paying back. really bury the guy deep and then there will be little hope of restitution
Qualified immunity, means that if you wear a badge, you are exempt from law and free to do anything you please! The courts will back badge toting individuals, because they think they are above the law as well. They think, they have judicial immunity, they do not.
Deeply, deeply concerned? I'll bet if it was the judge's money that had been swindled we'd see deep concern with actual consequences. First a Ponzi scheme, then a shell game with the assets…c'mon, hasn't Conour abused the judicial system and his clients long enough? I say enough already.
Wow, just wow.