ILNews

BLE needs second site to fit applicants

Back to TopE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

There are a lot of people who want to become attorneys. So many people, in fact, that the Indiana Board of Law Examiners has had to find a second location to administer the July test.

Executive Director Linda Loepker said this is the first time the BLE has had two testing locations. For the last five years, the test has been administered at Primo West in Plainfield. This year, due about 100 more bar applicants, the BLE had to find another location. Now, some will take the test at Primo’s sister location in Indianapolis, Primo South.

Loepker said the dimensions and size of the facilities are the same, which is an advantage in duplicating testing conditions. They are also the only users of the facility at the time of the test, which allows the BLE to control noise and other situations.

If you are scheduled to take the test in July and your last name is begins with the letters A through L, you are to take the test at Primo West. Those with the last names beginning with the letters M through Z are to take it at Primo South. Loepker said there’s no advantage to taking the exam at one site as opposed to the other.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Indiana State Bar Association

Indianapolis Bar Association

Evansville Bar Association

Allen County Bar Association

Indiana Lawyer on Facebook

facebook
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. What is this, the Ind Supreme Court thinking that there is a separation of powers and limited enumerated powers as delegated by a dusty old document? Such eighteen century thinking, so rare and unwanted by the elites in this modern age. Dictate to us, dictate over us, the massess are chanting! George Soros agrees. Time to change with times Ind Supreme Court, says all President Snows. Rule by executive decree is the new black.

  2. I made the same argument before a commission of the Indiana Supreme Court and then to the fedeal district and federal appellate courts. Fell flat. So very glad to read that some judges still beleive that evidentiary foundations matter.

  3. KUDOS to the Indiana Supreme Court for realizing that some bureacracies need to go to the stake. Recall what RWR said: "No government ever voluntarily reduces itself in size. Government programs, once launched, never disappear. Actually, a government bureau is the nearest thing to eternal life we'll ever see on this earth!" NOW ... what next to this rare and inspiring chopping block? Well, the Commission on Gender and Race (but not religion!?!) is way overdue. And some other Board's could be cut with a positive for State and the reputation of the Indiana judiciary.

  4. During a visit where an informant with police wears audio and video, does the video necessary have to show hand to hand transaction of money and narcotics?

  5. I will agree with that as soon as law schools stop lying to prospective students about salaries and employment opportunities in the legal profession. There is no defense to the fraudulent numbers first year salaries they post to mislead people into going to law school.

ADVERTISEMENT