ILBlogs

First Impressions
Jennifer Mehalik
More First Impressions

Recent Blog Posts

3/4 of attorneys want out

Jennifer Mehalik
February 16, 2009
Comments(0)
Based on an unscientific, informal poll on our Web site, 75 percent of you have said you are leaving the practice of law to pursue another career or you are at least considering it. The sample of this question is small,...
More

Big dreams, small salaries

Jennifer Mehalik
February 13, 2009
Comments(2)
Update: The jobs in politics seminar has moved from March 11 to April 8. From IL reporter Rebecca Berfanger, who attended a session of the Alternative Legal Career series at Indiana University Maurer School of Law - Bloomington this week. During...
More

Priced out of the market

Jennifer Mehalik
February 11, 2009
Comment(1)
A handful of partners and attorneys are leaving Bingham McHale in Indianapolis to start their own insurance litigation firm because as one partner said, “We were pricing ourselves out of the market.” The amicable split between the attorneys and the fifth-largest...
More

Flexibility key for students

Jennifer Mehalik
February 9, 2009
Comments(0)
Some advice for law students struggling to find summer work: be flexible and think broadly. That’s what the director of the career and development office at Indiana University Maurer School of Law – Bloomington told Indiana Lawyer Friday. Comments from our...
More

Summer associate competition?

Jennifer Mehalik
February 4, 2009
Comments(4)
There are still a few months before summer associates begin their jobs at firms this summer, but I wanted to hear from you on how your search for a position has gone. With all the talk of cuts at law firms,...
More

A new career direction

Jennifer Mehalik
February 2, 2009
Comments(0)
Update: The seminar on jobs in politics has been rescheduled to April 8. Ever wish you could do something else with your law degree, but you don’t know where to start? Feeling burnt out on practicing law, worried about your current...
More

Snow day for some

Jennifer Mehalik
January 28, 2009
Comment(1)
The snow that moved through much of Indiana Tuesday and today has dumped a foot or more of snow in some places. Of course, it made the commute home yesterday and to work today interesting in the metro Indianapolis area. It...
More

Solo v. large firm

Jennifer Mehalik
January 26, 2009
Comments(0)
There’s not a definite end in sight to the current economic downtown we’re experiencing, but who’s better off to ride it out – solos or large firms? There are compelling arguments for both sides. Solos may be able to adapt better...
More
Page  << 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 >> pager
Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
  1. I need an experienced attorney to handle a breach of contract matter. Kindly respond for more details. Graham Young

  2. I thought the slurs were the least grave aspects of her misconduct, since they had nothing to do with her being on the bench. Why then do I suspect they were the focus? I find this a troubling trend. At least she was allowed to keep her law license.

  3. Section 6 of Article I of the Indiana Constitution is pretty clear and unequivocal: "Section 6. No money shall be drawn from the treasury for the benefit of any religious or theological institution."

  4. Video pen? Nice work, "JW"! Let this be a lesson and a caution to all disgruntled ex-spouses (or soon-to-be ex-spouses) . . . you may think that altercation is going to get you some satisfaction . . . it will not.

  5. First comment on this thread is a fitting final comment on this thread, as that the MCBA never answered Duncan's fine question, and now even Eric Holder agrees that the MCBA was in material error as to the facts: "I don't get it" from Duncan December 1, 2014 5:10 PM "The Grand Jury met for 25 days and heard 70 hours of testimony according to this article and they made a decision that no crime occurred. On what basis does the MCBA conclude that their decision was "unjust"? What special knowledge or evidence does the MCBA have that the Grand Jury hearing this matter was unaware of? The system that we as lawyers are sworn to uphold made a decision that there was insufficient proof that officer committed a crime. How can any of us say we know better what was right than the jury that actually heard all of the the evidence in this case."

ADVERTISEMENT