Jennifer MehalikJune 13, 2008
When I acted up as a child, I would be threatened with a spanking. Lucky for me, my parents only delivered on the threat a
couple times in my life. A stern look or grounding seemed to do the trick...
More
Jennifer MehalikJune 12, 2008
Correct me if I’m wrong, but if you are involved in a trial dealing with an alleged rape, then the word “rape” should come
up in order to describe the purported crime. But one judge in Kansas has made headlines...
More
Jennifer MehalikJune 11, 2008
Looks like the legal profession is starting to feel the effects of the slowing economy. According to the latest statistics
from the U.S. Department of Labor, the U.S. legal sector lost 1,100 jobs in May. That’s the third consecutive month...
More
Jennifer MehalikJune 10, 2008
A Muncie man was sentenced June 6 by a federal judge to 121 months in prison for a hate crime. The man burned a cross last
year in the lawn of a woman and her three biracial children back in...
More
Jennifer MehalikJune 9, 2008
Judges have the right to control their courtrooms to maintain civility and safety, but throwing people in jail because
of a ringing cell phone is extreme. That’s what Niagara Falls City Court Judge Robert Restaino did when no one...
More
Jennifer MehalikJune 6, 2008
It’s no secret that what you post online can be viewed by anyone – including a judge. A not-for-publication case handed down
by the Court of Appeals Thursday involves a custody dispute, with the father offering evidence he found on...
More
Jennifer MehalikJune 5, 2008
Is there something in the water that’s causing attorneys to disregard some of the most basic requirements of being a lawyer
in Indiana ? It seems more and more attorneys who practice in Indiana are having trouble meeting continuing legal...
More
Jennifer MehalikJune 4, 2008
Gay marriage will be allowed in California – for now. The California Supreme Court released an order today denying requests
to stay its decision to legalize gay marriages until after the November 2008 election. The split court voted 4-3 to...
More
The court of appeals not only tries to rewrite or interpret the law to suit their fancy, now they choose play stupid as well. Every consideration must be given to pro se litigants, who are not held to the same standards as attorneys, as stated by,SCOTUS. I assume they didn't have a lawyer, since one wasn't mentioned and I strongly suggest thatb the rest of the, origional petitioners get back in there and fight for their rights.
the irony of situations like this is that the clients whom conour cheated are the ones who should be pulling hardest for him to remain free and keep his law license, so they have some hopes of him paying back. really bury the guy deep and then there will be little hope of restitution
Qualified immunity, means that if you wear a badge, you are exempt from law and free to do anything you please! The courts will back badge toting individuals, because they think they are above the law as well. They think, they have judicial immunity, they do not.
Deeply, deeply concerned? I'll bet if it was the judge's money that had been swindled we'd see deep concern with actual consequences. First a Ponzi scheme, then a shell game with the assets…c'mon, hasn't Conour abused the judicial system and his clients long enough? I say enough already.
Wow, just wow.