Blomquist: In Defense of Hope

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

blomquist-kerryI’ve been reading this book about the benefits of positive anticipation. Well actually I’ve owned this book for several years but I put everything aside and pick it back up when I start to believe that cynicism is the great disease of the era, and, frankly, I begin to feel infected.

Don’t lie. We all have those moments when we feel like Western Civilization has, indeed peaked. When the CNN “news flash” on my iPhone is about the relentless yet oh so boring “sextual” escapades of NYC mayoral candidate Anthony Weiner. Add insult to injury when CNN is quoting “” as a viable news source when they report Weiner’s alias is/was “Carlos Danger.” People, you just cannot make this stuff up. When fear of any number of things (terrorism, economic ruin, undocumented immigrants, global warming or gay boy scouts) dominates us to the point that our number one coping skill seems to be to shut down and talk about Anthony Weiner.

So I pull out the book I have about hope. Hope is, according to Jim Wallis, editor of the evangelical social justice magazine Sojourners, “believing, in spite of the evidence, then watching the evidence change.” How incredibly cool is that?

As reported in the last issue of The Indiana Lawyer, Indiana Chief Justice Brent Dickson hopes that we will eventually have fewer and fewer pro se litigants in our courts because we Hoosier lawyers will step up and volunteer for those who cannot afford counsel. At this time of continued sequestration when court and legal service budgets are suffering drastic funding cuts, and there are more pro se litigants than ever before, access to actual justice is in question. Pro bono service must be the answer. Here, I footnote three resources:

1. The Oath we all took: “…I will never reject, from any consideration personal to myself, the cause of the defenseless, the oppressed or those who cannot afford adequate legal assistance, so help me God.” Sound familiar?

2. Rules of Professional Conduct: Rule 6.1. Pro Bono Publico Service: A lawyer should render public interest legal service. A lawyer may discharge this responsibility by providing professional services at no fee or a reduced fee to persons of limited means or to public service or charitable groups or organizations, by service in activities for improving the law, the legal system or the legal profession, and by financial support for organizations that provide legal services to persons of limited means.

3. Your mother. Let’s face it, it’s the right thing to do.

Speaking for the IndyBar, we are beginning to see the evidence change.

This year the chair of the Pro Bono Standing Committee is Judge Mark Stoner, and under his leadership this bar association has so far in 2013 provided pro bono legal services to well over 1,100 people, and folks, those are just the cases we assigned. Snapshot into the world of the IndyBar pro bono effort:

• Ask-a-Lawyer: 220 hours donated; 567 people helped.

• Legal Line: 112 hours donated; 399 people helped

• Low-Asset Will Program: 52 hours donated; 16 people helped.

• Homeless Shelter program: 150 hours donated; 80 people helped.

You get the picture here, right? While these numbers are only estimates and don’t include key programs like the Bankruptcy Help Line, the Modest Means Program and the Hospice Program, this is remarkable on all levels, and the lawyers, paralegals and law students who are volunteering their time cannot be praised highly enough. Thanks to them, the evidence is indeed changing.

A word to those who have quietly abstained from pro bono work: Give it a shot. I just volunteered for the Hospice Program and the training was fascinating. Yes, it is out of my professional comfort zone, but there can be no better work than helping people leave this world securely, and I feel safe with the support of the program and the mentors it provides. If you cannot practice pro bono, consider funding it. All legal services organizations are in a world of hurt right now—you can help them.

So when you are having one of those days when it is easier to focus on Anthony Weiner than on the myriad of troubling social ills that seem to be ignored, refocus. Redirect the bright shiny light on the work of our members who are helping justice come and settle in the corners of hundred of Hoosiers. Try to realize that, in the paraphrased words of Billie Holiday, “The difficult, we can do right now. The impossible will take a little while.1”•

1 CRAZY HE CALLS ME, a song written by Carl Sigman and Sidney Keith Russell. Sung by the incomparable Billie Holiday.


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. I think the cops are doing a great job locking up criminals. The Murder rates in the inner cities are skyrocketing and you think that too any people are being incarcerated. Maybe we need to lock up more of them. We have the ACLU, BLM, NAACP, Civil right Division of the DOJ, the innocent Project etc. We have court system with an appeal process that can go on for years, with attorneys supplied by the government. I'm confused as to how that translates into the idea that the defendants are not being represented properly. Maybe the attorneys need to do more Pro-Bono work

  2. We do not have 10% of our population (which would mean about 32 million) incarcerated. It's closer to 2%.

  3. If a class action suit or other manner of retribution is possible, count me in. I have email and voicemail from the man. He colluded with opposing counsel, I am certain. My case was damaged so severely it nearly lost me everything and I am still paying dearly.

  4. There's probably a lot of blame that can be cast around for Indiana Tech's abysmal bar passage rate this last February. The folks who decided that Indiana, a state with roughly 16,000 to 18,000 attorneys, needs a fifth law school need to question the motives that drove their support of this project. Others, who have been "strong supporters" of the law school, should likewise ask themselves why they believe this institution should be supported. Is it because it fills some real need in the state? Or is it, instead, nothing more than a resume builder for those who teach there part-time? And others who make excuses for the students' poor performance, especially those who offer nothing more than conspiracy theories to back up their claims--who are they helping? What evidence do they have to support their posturing? Ultimately, though, like most everything in life, whether one succeeds or fails is entirely within one's own hands. At least one student from Indiana Tech proved this when he/she took and passed the February bar. A second Indiana Tech student proved this when they took the bar in another state and passed. As for the remaining 9 who took the bar and didn't pass (apparently, one of the students successfully appealed his/her original score), it's now up to them (and nobody else) to ensure that they pass on their second attempt. These folks should feel no shame; many currently successful practicing attorneys failed the bar exam on their first try. These same attorneys picked themselves up, dusted themselves off, and got back to the rigorous study needed to ensure they would pass on their second go 'round. This is what the Indiana Tech students who didn't pass the first time need to do. Of course, none of this answers such questions as whether Indiana Tech should be accredited by the ABA, whether the school should keep its doors open, or, most importantly, whether it should have even opened its doors in the first place. Those who promoted the idea of a fifth law school in Indiana need to do a lot of soul-searching regarding their decisions. These same people should never be allowed, again, to have a say about the future of legal education in this state or anywhere else. Indiana already has four law schools. That's probably one more than it really needs. But it's more than enough.

  5. This man Steve Hubbard goes on any online post or forum he can find and tries to push his company. He said court reporters would be obsolete a few years ago, yet here we are. How does he have time to search out every single post about court reporters and even spy in private court reporting forums if his company is so successful???? Dude, get a life. And back to what this post was about, I agree that some national firms cause a huge problem.