ILNews

Blomquist: Lawyers Confront Human Trafficking

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

blomquist-kerryOne of the great benefits of being an IndyBar member for me is the chance to be around other lawyers; and great lawyers at that. My professional world at the Indiana Coalition Against Domestic Violence does not allow me the opportunity to be with other members of my profession, so I get my lawyer “fix” through the bar. I get to step out of the fast paced survivor centered work I love, and for lack of a better way of saying it, play in the sandbox. Dance with the Devil. See how the other half lives.

So imagine my surprise when I was donning my snazziest pair of pumps at the recent ABA Midyear Meeting, priming myself for some big time important lawyer networking, when the keynote speech was designed to — get this — get lawyers educated and engaged about the issue of human trafficking.

Oh lordy. They are preaching to the choir. Channeling my inner advocate, it was everything I could do to not yell “Testify!” in the middle of the presentation. Because this much I know from my day job: Human Trafficking is tied as the second largest and fastest growing criminal industry in the world. It generates roughly $32 billion per year for traffickers and victimizes 27 million men, women and children annually. And despite all of these staggering statistics, if this issue isn’t on your radar, it is incredibly easy to overlook.

That is why, in 2013 the American Bar Association is addressing this issue head on. A series of resolutions passed by the ABA’s House of Delegates at the February Midyear meeting encourages the creation of policies to protect victims. One of those resolutions urges bar associations to develop more training programs to help identify trafficking victims.

Let’s face it people, your IndyBar is a leader in the world of metro bar associations. We are 5,000 strong and others bars look to us for best practices and innovations in programming. The State of Indiana has stepped up its fight against human trafficking since Super Bowl 2012 with stronger and smarter laws and better victim outreach, support and assistance. It is this bar president’s opinion that we can help by educating and empowering our colleagues to recognize human trafficking when we see it, and then as importantly, to know what to do as a result.

So, knowledge is power.

Human trafficking comes in two forms: sex trafficking and labor trafficking. Victims are most often women and children, although men are definitely victims as well. The average age of a victim entering the trafficking industry is 12-14 years old. The range of tactics used by the perpetrators of trafficking include physical and emotional violence; isolation; financial abuse; threats to persons, family and others; withholding of food, sleep, medical care; sexual abuse and exploitation; and using children to manipulate and control their victims. Trafficking is modern day slavery and it is found in many industries including:

The sex industry
Factories, restaurants, hotels
Health and beauty industries
Forced labor in agricultural or construction industries
Domestic servitude as servant, housekeeper, or nanny

Like intimate partner violence, it reaches every age, culture, race, ethnicity, income level and indeed, location. Be certain on this, human trafficking is happening in Indiana.

ABA President Laurel Bellows: “As a result of these resolutions, I am proud to say that it is the new policy of the ABA to fight human trafficking and protect victims by mobilizing lawyers, judges, bar associations and law enforcement.” Look for an IndyBar CLE on this issue, because knowledge of this issue, by IndyBar colleagues and constituents, matters.•

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Indiana State Bar Association

Indianapolis Bar Association

Evansville Bar Association

Allen County Bar Association

Indiana Lawyer on Facebook

facebook
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. It appears the police and prosecutors are allowed to change the rules halfway through the game to suit themselves. I am surprised that the congress has not yet eliminated the right to a trial in cases involving any type of forensic evidence. That would suit their foolish law and order police state views. I say we eliminate the statute of limitations for crimes committed by members of congress and other government employees. Of course they would never do that. They are all corrupt cowards!!!

  2. Poor Judge Brown probably thought that by slavishly serving the godz of the age her violations of 18th century concepts like due process and the rule of law would be overlooked. Mayhaps she was merely a Judge ahead of her time?

  3. in a lawyer discipline case Judge Brown, now removed, was presiding over a hearing about a lawyer accused of the supposedly heinous ethical violation of saying the words "Illegal immigrant." (IN re Barker) http://www.in.gov/judiciary/files/order-discipline-2013-55S00-1008-DI-429.pdf .... I wonder if when we compare the egregious violations of due process by Judge Brown, to her chiding of another lawyer for politically incorrectness, if there are any conclusions to be drawn about what kind of person, what kind of judge, what kind of apparatchik, is busy implementing the agenda of political correctness and making off-limits legit advocacy about an adverse party in a suit whose illegal alien status is relevant? I am just asking the question, the reader can make own conclsuion. Oh wait-- did I use the wrong adjective-- let me rephrase that, um undocumented alien?

  4. of course the bigger questions of whether or not the people want to pay for ANY bussing is off limits, due to the Supreme Court protecting the people from DEMOCRACY. Several decades hence from desegregation and bussing plans and we STILL need to be taking all this taxpayer money to combat mostly-imagined "discrimination" in the most obviously failed social program of the postwar period.

  5. You can put your photos anywhere you like... When someone steals it they know it doesn't belong to them. And, a man getting a divorce is automatically not a nice guy...? That's ridiculous. Since when is need of money a conflict of interest? That would mean that no one should have a job unless they are already financially solvent without a job... A photographer is also under no obligation to use a watermark (again, people know when a photo doesn't belong to them) or provide contact information. Hey, he didn't make it easy for me to pay him so I'll just take it! Well heck, might as well walk out of the grocery store with a cart full of food because the lines are too long and you don't find that convenient. "Only in Indiana." Oh, now you're passing judgement on an entire state... What state do you live in? I need to characterize everyone in your state as ignorant and opinionated. And the final bit of ignorance; assuming a photo anyone would want is lucky and then how much does your camera have to cost to make it a good photo, in your obviously relevant opinion?

ADVERTISEMENT