Blomquist: The Hon. Robyn Moberly, Indiana's First Female Federal Bankruptcy Court Judge

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

blomquist-kerryAnyone who knows me well knows a few key things about me: I’m a “runner,” though post age 50, I use that term very loosely. I have a dysfunctional relationship with Miracle Whip, of which I am not proud but as substances go, it seems relatively harmless. In my former professional life I was an “electronic journalist” (read “radio-TV reporter”). Riveting, I know.

Finally, I am an unapologetic believer in, and admirer of, women lawyers. Young female lawyers out there have some amazingly strong role models to look to and to learn from, if they pay attention and ask the important questions. Thus, taking full advantage of items three and four above, this column is to congratulate, honor and pick the brain of Indiana’s first female federal bankruptcy court judge, the Honorable Robyn Moberly. Special thanks for her candor, wit and leadership.

On how it feels…

“I feel like the luckiest person in the world! As is often said, luck is what happens when preparation meets opportunity. But, career opportunities are a lot about timing and about things outside of one’s control. I know I was prepared for this opportunity, but you never know when, or if, it might happen.

You also have the variable of who is making the ultimate decision on your future. You may or may not ‘click’ with that person. There are many people well qualified for most jobs but only one person gets it, so it has to depend upon whether the decision-makers feel a good connection with you and whether you’re on your toes the day of the interview. I feel quite fortunate that the stars aligned for me.”

On “the learning curve” of a new position...

“I have tackled this new learning curve just as I did when I was first elected to the state trial bench and was assigned to a criminal court. I read everything I can get my hands on, and each time a new issue comes before me, I learn it thoroughly because I know it will come up again and again. Lawyers will forgive you if you don’t know the answer the first time when you’re new, but they expect you to learn it and get it right.

I have a wonderfully smart law clerk, Pat Marshall, who worked for Judge Metz for 16 years. As Judge Metz said, Pat was his gift to me. She and I have already developed a good friendship and working relationship. My years as a state trial judge have been a big advantage too. It’s surprising how similar being a bankruptcy judge and being a state trial judge are.”

On the attainability of the federal bench for women…

“The Southern District of Indiana has proven to be increasingly open to women. During my career, I’ve noticed that issues reach a tipping point, and then quickly become the norm. Jobs that were outside the reach of women rather have suddenly become widely attainable and no longer a novelty. Certainly the strength of the females on the federal bench before me opened the door for all women.

On the issue of gender equity in the profession of law…1

“I wish I had the answer! I’ve met with members of several firms who are trying very hard to figure this one out themselves. I believe there is a sincere desire to recruit and retain talented women but the law firm model almost exclusively rewards hours billed and collected. I’ve noticed that young male attorneys are changing their attitudes toward time with their families, so it’s surely an issue that is beginning to cross the genders. As more women are the decision-makers in business, they are hiring female attorneys. When you’re the rainmaker, you’re in control. I’d really encourage women to learn practice development skills because when you own the book of business, you can name the tune.”

On this being (perhaps) the position she will retire from….

“I read a funny quote from Chris Rock where he said that girlfriends are always auditioning, trying to be their best, all of the time.  But, wives are like Supreme Court Justices: they do whatever the heck they want. 2

I think it’s useful to spend one’s career ‘auditioning’ and being the best you can be on each individual day. Even though I’m now writing the last chapter of my career, I hope I’ll always be ‘auditioning’ and never feel ‘entitled.


1 Current ABA President Laurel Bellows has made this a focus of her year as president, noting the troubling statistic that although woman account for nearly half of law students and hold more than half of this nation’s judicial clerkships, the percentage of women equity partners is holding static at 16 percent or less.

2 Two things on this from the author: 1) men do it too 2) it is difficult at best to propose legislation that will affect this.  


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. This new language about a warning has not been discussed at previous meetings. It's not available online. Since it must be made public knowledge before the vote, does anyone know exactly what it says? Further, this proposal was held up for 5 weeks because members Carol and Lucy insisted that all terms used be defined. So now, definitions are unnecessary and have not been inserted? Beyond these requirements, what is the logic behind giving one free pass to discriminators? Is that how laws work - break it once and that's ok? Just don't do it again? Three members of Carmel's council have done just about everything they can think of to prohibit an anti-discrimination ordinance in Carmel, much to Brainard's consternation, I'm told. These three 'want to be so careful' that they have failed to do what at least 13 other communities, including Martinsville, have already done. It's not being careful. It's standing in the way of what 60% of Carmel residents want. It's hurting CArmel in thT businesses have refused to locate because the council has not gotten with the program. And now they want to give discriminatory one free shot to do so. Unacceptable. Once three members leave the council because they lost their races, the Carmel council will have unanimous approval of the ordinance as originally drafted, not with a one free shot to discriminate freebie. That happens in January 2016. Why give a freebie when all we have to do is wait 3 months and get an ordinance with teeth from Day 1? If nothing else, can you please get s copy from Carmel and post it so we can see what else has changed in the proposal?

  2. Here is an interesting 2012 law review article for any who wish to dive deeper into this subject matter: Excerpt: "Judicial interpretation of the ADA has extended public entity liability to licensing agencies in the licensure and certification of attorneys.49 State bar examiners have the authority to conduct fitness investigations for the purpose of determining whether an applicant is a direct threat to the public.50 A “direct threat” is defined as “a significant risk to the health or safety of others that cannot be eliminated by a modification of policies, practices or procedures, or by the provision of auxiliary aids or services as provided by § 35.139.”51 However, bar examiners may not utilize generalizations or stereotypes about the applicant’s disability in concluding that an applicant is a direct threat.52"

  3. We have been on the waiting list since 2009, i was notified almost 4 months ago that we were going to start receiving payments and we still have received nothing. Every time I call I'm told I just have to wait it's in the lawyers hands. Is everyone else still waiting?

  4. I hope you dont mind but to answer my question. What amendment does this case pretain to?

  5. Research by William J Federer Chief Justice John Marshall commented May 9, 1833, on the pamphlet The Relation of Christianity to Civil Government in the United States written by Rev. Jasper Adams, President of the College of Charleston, South Carolina (The Papers of John Marshall, ed. Charles Hobson, Chapel Hill: Univ. of North Carolina Press, 2006, p, 278): "Reverend Sir, I am much indebted to you for the copy of your valuable sermon on the relation of Christianity to civil government preached before the convention of the Protestant Episcopal Church in Charleston, on the 13th of February last. I have read it with great attention and advantage. The documents annexed to the sermon certainly go far in sustaining the proposition which it is your purpose to establish. One great object of the colonial charters was avowedly the propagation of the Christian faith. Means have been employed to accomplish this object, and those means have been used by government..." John Marshall continued: "No person, I believe, questions the importance of religion to the happiness of man even during his existence in this world. It has at all times employed his most serious meditation, and had a decided influence on his conduct. The American population is entirely Christian, and with us, Christianity and Religion are identified. It would be strange, indeed, if with such a people, our institutions did not presuppose Christianity, and did not often refer to it, and exhibit relations with it. Legislation on the subject is admitted to require great delicacy, because freedom of conscience and respect for our religion both claim our most serious regard. You have allowed their full influence to both. With very great respect, I am Sir, your Obedt., J. Marshall."