ILNews

Sidebars: Bloomington eatery’s Cajun food leaves diners satisfied

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

SidebarsEditor’s Note: Sidebars reviews and rates eateries lawyers may enjoy visiting when working at courthouses throughout Indiana. Jennifer offers this issue’s review.

I love working with other lawyers from other firms on cases. It gives you new perspectives on how to approach and prepare for a case, and it creates new friendships. I have had the pleasure to work with Frost Brown Todd lawyer Tom Farlow on a few cases in the past, but a recent case has led us to spend more time working together. Since it is a case in Bloomington, we spend some time in the car together. While Tom is a great lawyer, he also happens to be the most passive-aggressive backseat driver I have ever met. He doesn’t say “look out” or “don’t get over,” rather he jerks his head around as I attempt a lane change. If he verbalizes his concerns, it is matter-of-fact like. “Can you believe how some people stop for red lights like the car in front of us?” really means “SLOW THE %#$& DOWN! WE ARE GOING TO DIE IF YOU DON’T START BRAKING!!!”

But Tom does know how to pick a place to eat. After some depositions in Bloomington, we dined at the Uptown Café right off the courthouse square. The restaurant dons a comfortably upscale décor. It was busy, which is always a good sign especially when the campus is out for summer break. We were quickly seated and served.

The menu brags, by its selection, a Cajun pride but has other options. For appetizers, one may choose from a Rock shrimp and calamari fritti with mango coconut cocktail sauce and chipotle sour cream. There is the Cajun liver pâté or Cuban black bean soup. A handful of salads are offered with house-made dressings. The salad offerings include a Chinese chicken salad, the traditional Caesar, or a mesclun salad that includes 14 organic baby lettuces topped with gorgonzola cheese, baby tomatoes, onions, olives and walnuts. For any salad you may add toppings like chicken, salmon or jumbo shrimp for a little extra.

We went straight for the entrees. Tom ordered the special – fried perch and fries. It was perfectly battered so it didn’t mask the fish. He was not passive-aggressive when it came to the fish. He aggressively gave it a thumbs-up. I loved my Louisiana hot pepper chicken. Cajun-spiced chicken breast cutlets smothered in a cheesy, hot pepper cream sauce with basmati rice. All I need to say is it was scrumptious. However, once you see the menu, decision making will be tough. There is pot roast, crawfish étouffée, red beans and rice, gumbo of the day and more. On the sandwich side of the menu, more temptations await: shrimp tacos, Ararat chicken pita (sliced chicken marinated in olive oil, rosemary and garlic, placed inside a warm pita with aioli, lettuce and a tomato-onion-cucumber relish), a Veg Head Sandwich (on which you can ask for, ironically, bacon), and a Cajun meatloaf sandwich. Finally, if you feel like breakfast fare, they offer regular items such as a potato omelet or eggs and bacon, but also a unique creme brulee French toast – slices of a baguette on top of a custard infused with vanilla. Seriously? Yes.

If our entrees are indicators of how the other selections will taste, any selection will satisfy. While some of the entrees sound heavy, we left sated but not overly so. As I drove back to Indy with my jumpy passenger, we laughed about how I would be making fun of him in this upcoming article. Fortunately, he did not object, but we’ll see after he reads it in print.

Go and enjoy a nice lunch and take a friend, co-counsel or as I did, both.•

Uptown Café, 102 E. Kirkwood Ave., Bloomington, IN. http://the-uptown.com

Fred Vaiana and Jennifer Lukemeyer practice at Voyles Zahn & Paul in Indianapolis, focusing on criminal defense. Both enjoy a good meal with colleagues and friends. The opinions expressed in this column are those of the authors.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
2015 Distinguished Barrister &
Up and Coming Lawyer Reception

Tuesday, May 5, 2015 • 4:30 - 7:00 pm
Learn More


ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. Oh, the name calling was not name calling, it was merely social commentary making this point, which is on the minds of many, as an aside to the article's focus: https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20100111082327AAmlmMa Or, if you prefer a local angle, I give you exhibit A in that analysis of viva la difference: http://fox59.com/2015/03/16/moed-appears-on-house-floor-says-hes-not-resigning/

  2. Too many attorneys take their position as a license to intimidate and threaten non attorneys in person and by mail. Did find it ironic that a reader moved to comment twice on this article could not complete a paragraph without resorting to insulting name calling (rethuglican) as a substitute for reasoned discussion. Some people will never get the point this action should have made.

  3. People have heard of Magna Carta, and not the Provisions of Oxford & Westminster. Not that anybody really cares. Today, it might be considered ethnic or racial bias to talk about the "Anglo Saxon common law." I don't even see the word English in the blurb above. Anyhow speaking of Edward I-- he was famously intolerant of diversity himself viz the Edict of Expulsion 1290. So all he did too like making parliament a permanent institution-- that all must be discredited. 100 years from now such commemorations will be in the dustbin of history.

  4. Oops, I meant discipline, not disciple. Interesting that those words share such a close relationship. We attorneys are to be disciples of the law, being disciplined to serve the law and its source, the constitutions. Do that, and the goals of Magna Carta are advanced. Do that not and Magna Carta is usurped. Do that not and you should be disciplined. Do that and you should be counted a good disciple. My experiences, once again, do not reveal a process that is adhering to the due process ideals of Magna Carta. Just the opposite, in fact. Braveheart's dying rebel (for a great cause) yell comes to mind.

  5. It is not a sign of the times that many Ind licensed attorneys (I am not) would fear writing what I wrote below, even if they had experiences to back it up. Let's take a minute to thank God for the brave Baron's who risked death by torture to tell the government that it was in the wrong. Today is a career ruination that whistleblowers risk. That is often brought on by denial of licenses or disciple for those who dare speak truth to power. Magna Carta says truth rules power, power too often claims that truth matters not, only Power. Fight such power for the good of our constitutional republics. If we lose them we have only bureaucratic tyranny to pass onto our children. Government attorneys, of all lawyers, should best realize this and work to see our patrimony preserved. I am now a government attorney (once again) in Kansas, and respecting the rule of law is my passion, first and foremost.

ADVERTISEMENT