ILNews

Book recounts '08 presidential race

Back to TopE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

An Indiana lawyer intimately involved in Barack Obama’s presidential run has written a book about the campaign and how the consistently Republican state went Democrat for the first time since 1964.
 

Kip Tew Tew

Kipper V. Tew , a partner at Indianapolis-based Krieg DeVault, wrote “Journey to Blue” after being the state chair of the Barack Obama presidential campaign in Indiana. Tew is actively involved in the political process, and the book provides an inside look at the victory and the ingredients that went into the historic election.

A former chairman of the state Democratic Party, Tew has also served as chief legal counsel to then-minority leader and current Indiana Speaker of the House B. Patrick Bauer. He has been an advisor for various statewide campaigns.

He began his legal career as counsel to the Bureau of Motor Vehicles. He later became manager of Government Affairs at PSI Energy – now Duke Energy – where he concentrated on all issues relating to utilities.

“Journey to Blue” is available in bookstores or can be purchased online at www.journeytoblue.org.•

ADVERTISEMENT

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Indiana State Bar Association

Indianapolis Bar Association

Evansville Bar Association

Allen County Bar Association

Indiana Lawyer on Facebook

facebook
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. I need an experienced attorney to handle a breach of contract matter. Kindly respond for more details. Graham Young

  2. I thought the slurs were the least grave aspects of her misconduct, since they had nothing to do with her being on the bench. Why then do I suspect they were the focus? I find this a troubling trend. At least she was allowed to keep her law license.

  3. Section 6 of Article I of the Indiana Constitution is pretty clear and unequivocal: "Section 6. No money shall be drawn from the treasury for the benefit of any religious or theological institution."

  4. Video pen? Nice work, "JW"! Let this be a lesson and a caution to all disgruntled ex-spouses (or soon-to-be ex-spouses) . . . you may think that altercation is going to get you some satisfaction . . . it will not.

  5. First comment on this thread is a fitting final comment on this thread, as that the MCBA never answered Duncan's fine question, and now even Eric Holder agrees that the MCBA was in material error as to the facts: "I don't get it" from Duncan December 1, 2014 5:10 PM "The Grand Jury met for 25 days and heard 70 hours of testimony according to this article and they made a decision that no crime occurred. On what basis does the MCBA conclude that their decision was "unjust"? What special knowledge or evidence does the MCBA have that the Grand Jury hearing this matter was unaware of? The system that we as lawyers are sworn to uphold made a decision that there was insufficient proof that officer committed a crime. How can any of us say we know better what was right than the jury that actually heard all of the the evidence in this case."

ADVERTISEMENT