Bradley: What to consider when preparing for mediation

May 3, 2017
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
bradley-galen-mug Bradley

By Galen Bradley

Coming to the negotiating table can be stressful, not only for the parties but also for the lawyers involved. Here are some tips based on my experiences for what both sides can do to have a successful mediation.

Disconnect. I can’t tell you how frequently I walk into a room to find the parties and attorneys using their electronics. Mediation is a wonderful marketing opportunity; however, you actually have to talk with your clients or company representatives. On the plaintiff’s side, while your client might not have a million-dollar case, they might be a lifelong referral source. Avoid the temptation of using your electronics, even if the client is. Instead, use the time to review the case and to think of additional arguments to support your client’s position. During a half-day mediation, you’ll be surprised at the additional arguments you may be able to come up with to support your client’s case while you’re focused solely on that case. You’ll have done a superb job for your client, and your client will likely recognize and appreciate your efforts.

On the defense side, insurance representatives and corporate clients normally have been through the mediation process hundreds, if not thousands, of times. The first thing defendants usually do when they arrive is open a laptop to monitor other matters or stay up on emails during the mediation. Obviously, you don’t want to pester, especially if your client or company representative is using the down time to “stay connected”; however, if you don’t use that time to strengthen the relationship with your client or representative, you’re missing a golden opportunity.

Avoid the last-minute submission. Mediators routinely receive submissions the morning of mediation or the evening prior. We understand how taxing litigators’ schedules are, and you’ve worked hard on the submission, so make sure to give your mediator ample opportunity to review and consider your materials in advance. The earlier the submission, the more informed the mediator will be, which will save time and expense of educating the mediator the day of mediation. Moreover, last-minute work product is usually not your best advocacy.

Understand liens and paybacks beforehand. Not only is it critical that liens be understood before mediation begins, but it’s also ideal to have communicated with lienholders before mediation. Lienholders sometimes participate in mediation, either in person or by telephone, which can be beneficial. However, if you’ve not communicated beforehand, at a minimum, have the lienholder’s contact information available so that contact can be made during the mediation, as this will hopefully prevent the “keep the offer on the table” scenario that we often find ourselves in while the parties “work on the liens.” I am not a strong proponent of “leaving the offer on the table.” Cases have a tendency to fall off parties’ radar once mediation has concluded, and buyer’s remorse is a real possibility should a complete resolution not be reached.

A picture is worth a thousand words. Instead of describing the scene of an accident, extent of damage (or lack thereof) to your client’s vehicle, or the hardware remaining in your client’s body —show us. Attach photos of an incident scene, vehicle or a radiographic study. The part of the brain used to process images is much larger than the part that processes words. Images are easily remembered and normally much more compelling, which is why we use them in court. Mediation can be the first test of that presentation.

If there’s something uncommon or sensitive, give a heads up. Include it in your submission or at mediation privately. We’ve not had the benefit of participating in the case for the past several years and perhaps emotions are boiling over between the litigants, or there is information you would like the mediator to know but it’s sensitive. Behind-the-scenes details can be invaluable in reaching a resolution. That said, use your right to confidentiality thoughtfully, as issues that concern you might give the mediator needed leverage to get the job done.

Save paper. Don’t attach entire deposition transcripts to your submission. We understand you have clients to answer to and you want your submission to not only look professional but to be persuasive as well. Having mediated more than 3,000 cases in the past 15 years, I’ve rarely read an entire deposition attached to a submission. Attach only necessary pages, but if you feel compelled to attach the entire deposition, refer to page and line numbers in the narrative part of your submission as you would for the court in a summary judgment designation.

Only attach critical medical records. If you attach voluminous medical records, be particular (highlighting is wonderful) when referring to the records. Attaching full sets of medical records from various providers is similar to attaching an entire deposition transcript. Most mediators are not going to read an entire set of medical records from a provider. Be specific in terms of what is actually important for your case.

Consider sending itemized damages to opposing counsel beforehand. More times than not, the first hurdle encountered at mediation is that the parties’ damage amounts don’t match. This can be a source of frustration (and embarrassment) for both sides when the case has been pending for many years and the plaintiff’s alleged damages are significantly different than the damages known to the defendant. Send a letter to your opponent 30 days or more before the mediation attaching your damage itemization, asking that they compare it to theirs so that the parties have an opportunity to discuss the differences in the damage calculations and obtain any additional necessary information or documents before mediation. Attorneys that make this a common practice normally shorten the time of their mediations, avoid unnecessary frustration and appear to have a much better handle on the case in front of their clients.•


Galen A. Bradley is a senior partner in the Merrillville office of Kightlinger & Gray LLP. He has practiced law for more than 20 years and has mediated civil cases for 15 years across Indiana. The opinions expressed are those of the author.


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. Mr. Levin says that the BMV engaged in misconduct--that the BMV (or, rather, someone in the BMV) knew Indiana motorists were being overcharged fees but did nothing to correct the situation. Such misconduct, whether engaged in by one individual or by a group, is called theft (defined as knowingly or intentionally exerting unauthorized control over the property of another person with the intent to deprive the other person of the property's value or use). Theft is a crime in Indiana (as it still is in most of the civilized world). One wonders, then, why there have been no criminal prosecutions of BMV officials for this theft? Government misconduct doesn't occur in a vacuum. An individual who works for or oversees a government agency is responsible for the misconduct. In this instance, somebody (or somebodies) with the BMV, at some time, knew Indiana motorists were being overcharged. What's more, this person (or these people), even after having the error of their ways pointed out to them, did nothing to fix the problem. Instead, the overcharges continued. Thus, the taxpayers of Indiana are also on the hook for the millions of dollars in attorneys fees (for both sides; the BMV didn't see fit to avail itself of the services of a lawyer employed by the state government) that had to be spent in order to finally convince the BMV that stealing money from Indiana motorists was a bad thing. Given that the BMV official(s) responsible for this crime continued their misconduct, covered it up, and never did anything until the agency reached an agreeable settlement, it seems the statute of limitations for prosecuting these folks has not yet run. I hope our Attorney General is paying attention to this fiasco and is seriously considering prosecution. Indiana, the state that works . . . for thieves.

  2. I'm glad that attorney Carl Hayes, who represented the BMV in this case, is able to say that his client "is pleased to have resolved the issue". Everyone makes mistakes, even bureaucratic behemoths like Indiana's BMV. So to some extent we need to be forgiving of such mistakes. But when those mistakes are going to cost Indiana taxpayers millions of dollars to rectify (because neither plaintiff's counsel nor Mr. Hayes gave freely of their services, and the BMV, being a state-funded agency, relies on taxpayer dollars to pay these attorneys their fees), the agency doesn't have a right to feel "pleased to have resolved the issue". One is left wondering why the BMV feels so pleased with this resolution? The magnitude of the agency's overcharges might suggest to some that, perhaps, these errors were more than mere oversight. Could this be why the agency is so "pleased" with this resolution? Will Indiana motorists ever be assured that the culture of incompetence (if not worse) that the BMV seems to have fostered is no longer the status quo? Or will even more "overcharges" and lawsuits result? It's fairly obvious who is really "pleased to have resolved the issue", and it's not Indiana's taxpayers who are on the hook for the legal fees generated in these cases.

  3. We are a Finance Industry Company professionals with over 15 Years Experience and a focus on providing Bank Guarantee and Standby Letter of Credit from some of the World Top 25 Prime Banks primarily from Barclays, Deutsche Bank, HSBC,Credit Suisse e.t.c. FEATURES: Amounts from $1 million to 5 Billion+ Euro’s or US Dollars Great Attorney Trust Account Protection Delivered via MT760, MT799 and MT103 Swift with Full Bank Responsibility Brokers Always Protected Purchase Instrument of BG/SBLC : 32%+2% Min Face Value cut = EUR/USD 1M-5B Lease Instrument of BG/SBLC : 4%+2% Min Face Value cut = EUR/USD 1M-5B Interested Agents/Brokers, Investors and Individual proposing international project funding should contact us for directives.We will be glad to share our working procedures with you upon request. We Facilitate Bank instruments SBLC for Lease and Purchase. Whether you are a new startup, medium or large establishment that needs a financial solution to fund/get your project off the ground or business looking for extra capital to expand your operation,our company renders credible and trusted bank guarantee provider who are willing to fund and give financing solutions that suits your specific business needs. We help you secure and issue sblc and bank guarantee for your trade, projects and investment from top AA rated world Banks like HSBC, Barclays, Dutch Ing Bank, Llyods e.t.c because that’s the best and safest strategy for our clients.e.t.c DESCRIPTION OF INSTRUMENTS 1. Instrument: Funds backed Bank Guarantee(BG) ICC-600 2. Currency : USD/EURO 3. Age of Issue: Fresh Cut 4. Term: One year and One day 5. Contract Amount: United State Dollars/Euros (Buyers Face Value) 6. Price : Buy:32%+1, Lease: 4%+2 7. Subsequent tranches: To be mutually agreed between both parties 8. Issuing Bank: Top RATED world banks like HSBC, Barclays, ING Dutch Bank, Llyods e.t.c 9. Delivery Term: Pre advise MT199 or MT799 first. Followed By SWIFT MT760 10. Payment Term: MT799 & Settlement via MT103 11. Hard Copy: By Bank Bonded Courier Interested Agents,Brokers, Investors and Individual proposing international project funding should contact us for directives.We will be glad to share our working procedures with you upon request. Name:Richardson McAnthony Contact Mail :

  4. Affordable Loan Offer ( NEED A LOAN?Sometime i really wanna help those in a financial problems.i was wondering why some people talks about inability to get a loan from a bank/company. have you guys ever try Eric Benson lending cost dollars to loan from their company. my aunty from USA,just got a home loan from Eric Benson Lending banking card service.and they gave her a loan of 8,000,000 USD. they give out loan from 100,000 USD - 100,000,000 USD. try it yourself and testimony. have a great day as you try.Kiss & Hug. Contact E-mail:

  5. From the article's fourth paragraph: "Her work underscores the blurry lines in Russia between the government and businesses . . ." Obviously, the author of this piece doesn't pay much attention to the "blurry lines" between government and businesses that exist in the United States. And I'm not talking only about Trump's alleged conflicts of interest. When lobbyists for major industries (pharmaceutical, petroleum, insurance, etc) have greater access to this country's elected representatives than do everyday individuals (i.e., voters), then I would say that the lines between government and business in the United States are just as blurry, if not more so, than in Russia.