ILNews

Can parents sue DCS? Yes, divided justices rule

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
Indiana Lawyer Focus

A sharply divided Indiana Supreme Court decision that a family may sue the state’s child protection agency for negligence is sure to resonate within the Department of Child Services, attorneys familiar with the case said.

“The whole purpose of this appeal was to try to hold the Department of Child Services accountable for its failure to abide by statutory requirements,” said Adam Sedia of Rubino Ruman Crosmer & Polen LLC of Dyer, who successfully argued the case decided in a 3-2 opinion Nov. 26.

Sedia will continue to represent the family in the case that’s been remanded to Vanderburgh Superior Court, where a status conference is scheduled for Jan. 7. At issue is DCS’ failure to disclose to parents allegations of sexual abuse of their 2-year-old daughter by a 12-year-old relative. The parents knew of allegations that the relative had abused a 4-year-old son, but they weren’t informed by DCS that the juvenile who was adjudicated delinquent also said he inappropriately touched their daughter.

Evansville police learned of the allegations regarding the daughter and reported them to DCS as required under the child abuse reporting statute, I.C. 31-33-6-1. But DCS didn’t notify the parents about the abuse allegations. Sedia said the mother learned of those allegations more than a year later during an email exchange unrelated to DCS.

Chief Justice Brent Dickson, writing for the majority joined by Justices Steven David and Robert Rucker, said that the failure of DCS to disclose the abuse allegations to the parents gave them a private right of action against the agency under the Tort Claim Act.

The plaintiffs “contend that DCS’s inaction with respect to the separate report of abuse to Daughter hindered their ability to obtain proper treatment. The facts, which we must construe in favor of the plaintiffs as the non-moving party on summary judgment, do not fall within the circumstances granting immunity under the plain words of the statute. … Accordingly, summary judgment is not proper,” Dickson wrote.

“Because plaintiffs’ claims against DCS do not result from the ‘initiation of a judicial or an administrative proceeding,’ DCS is not immune under Indiana Code Section 34-13-3-3(6), and summary judgment in favor of DCS is therefore improper,” the majority held.

While reversing the Vanderburgh County court’s grant of summary judgment for the agency, justices affirmed summary judgment in favor of Evansville police and the Vanderburgh County Prosecutor’s Office in F.D., G.D., and T.D. b/n/f J.D. and M.D.; and J.D. and M.D., individually v. Indiana Dept. of Child Services, Evansville Police Dept., and Vanderburgh County Prosecutor’s Office, 82S01-1301-CT-19.

Sedia believes the majority applied strict construction to determine DCS had an affirmative duty under I.C. 31-33-6-1 to notify the parents about the abuse allegations. “Based on the plain language, DCS isn’t afforded immunity,” he said. “I think the Legislature imposed this duty on DCS for a reason.”

But Justice Loretta Rush wrote a dissent joined by Justice Mark Massa that didn’t find anything of the sort.

“In the absence of immunity, Indiana law requires us to analyze whether the Legislature intended the violation of the Notice Statute to give rise to a negligence action. Applying that analysis, I can find no such legislative intent here,” Rush wrote.

“I do not condone DCS’s egregious conduct of allegedly not notifying parents of their child’s abuse, but not every breach of a statutory duty provides plaintiffs with a negligence action. … I conclude DCS is immune from liability, and even if it weren’t, the Notice Statute would not provide plaintiffs with a private right of action,” she wrote.

The decision split the court’s experienced juvenile court jurists – David and Rush. Supreme Court spokeswoman Kathryn Dolan said neither would comment on the ruling beyond the written opinions.

Attorney General Greg Zoeller’s office defended the suit, and Zoeller said in a statement that under the immunity principle behind Indiana’s Tort Claim Act, “taxpayers who did nothing to cause a situation ought not be held financially responsible without limit for actions of government employees.

“We respectfully disagree with the narrow scope of the Indiana Supreme Court majority’s opinion as to the State and immunity. Whether liability exists is a separate question that will be determined by the trial court. The Office of the Indiana Attorney General supports the prompt reporting of and prompt investigation of allegations of child abuse and neglect so that children are not subjected to further victimization, consistent with statutes the Legislature has passed,” Zoeller said.

Kaarin M. Lueck, a public defender in Richmond who writes the Indiana Juvenile Justice blog, said the impact of the decision remains to be seen, but the facts of this case appear to be narrow. “It’s a tragedy, and hopefully it doesn’t happen often,” she said.

“This case is another aspect of increased scrutiny of DCS processes and the expectation of no mistakes given what is at risk,” Lueck said, noting reforms within the agency in the last couple of years.

“In the world of all (Child in Need of Services) and delinquency cases, this scenario is going to play out in a small amount of cases,” Lueck said. “Usually, when there is an allegation of sex abuse, the child-victim is interviewed, and the parent is aware of the CPS assessment.

“By statute, DCS’ investigation can and usually will be shared with the prosecutor’s office for possible criminal or delinquency allegations,” she explained. “If the alleged perpetrator is adjudicated to be a delinquent, he or she is generally put into rehabilitative services that usually involve revealing any other potential victims. The delinquent child may be given a diagnostic polygraph to aid in this process. If any other victims are revealed, the therapist is required to notify DCS of new child abuse allegations. The assigned Child Protection Services worker will conduct their investigation. That is the point where the notification statute – I.C. 31-33-18-4 – requires that the parent, guardian or custodian be notified of the assessment in this scenario.”  

Sedia said there was deposition testimony in this case that the failure to notify was characterized as, “It just fell through the cracks.” He’s uncertain whether the high court’s decision may result in other similar claims against DCS.

“There’s always the freak case, and I hope this is it,” Sedia said. “I don’t know how many similar situations there are and have been, but it certainly presents something for the Department of Child Services to take caution of in the future.”

Lueck said the decision will force DCS “to figure out how to deal with these problems without opening up the floodgates of civil litigation.”

“As big a machine as DCS has become, how do you ensure this kind of thing doesn’t happen again?” Lueck said. “This cannot be the only time there’s been a mistake.”•
 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • I am shocked that there is ever immunity from accountability for ANY Government agency. That appears to violate every principle in the US Constitution, which exists to limit Government power and to ensure Government accountability
    I expressed my thought in the title, long as it was. I am shocked that there is ever immunity from accountability for ANY Government agency. That appears to violate every principle in the US Constitution, which exists to limit Government power and to ensure Government accountability. I don't know how many cases of legitimate child abuse exist, but in the few cases in which I knew the people involved, in every example an anonymous caller used DCS as their personal weapon to strike at innocent people over trivial disagreements that had no connection with any facts. Given that the system is vulnerable to abuse, and given the extreme harm any action by DCS causes to families, I would assume any degree of failure to comply with the smallest infraction of personal rights would result in mandatory review. Even one day of parent-child separation in the absence of reasonable cause for a felony arrest should result in severe penalties to those involved in the action. It appears to me, that like all bureaucracies, DCS is prone to interpret every case as legitimate. This is not an accusation against DCS. It is a statement about the nature of bureaucracies, and the need for ADDED scrutiny of all bureaucratic actions. Frankly, I question the constitutionality of bureaucracies in general, because their power is delegated, and therefore unaccountable. No Government action can be unaccountable if we want to avoid its eventual degeneration into irrelevance and lawlessness, and the law of the jungle. Our Constitution is the source of all Government power, and it is the contract that legitimizes all Government power. To the extent that its various protections against intrusion are set aside, so is the power afforded by that contract. Eventually overstepping the limits of power eliminates that power, as a law of nature. Even total tyranny eventually crumbles to nothing.
  • PEOPLE ALWAYS WANT TO REPORT US FOR WHATEVER REASON ON FAKE CLAIMS TO DCS
    YES I WENT THROUGH THIS BEFORE IN A DIFFERENT SITUATION WITH MY YOUNGEST SON PEOPLE NEED TO LEAVE US ALONE WITH DCS IF WE ARE NOT HURTING OR NEGLECT OUR CHILDREN WHY ARE THEY EVEN CALLED OUT AND THE PEOPLE MAKING FALSE REPORTS NEED TO GO TO JAIL AND HAVE A CLASS D FELONY ON THERE RECORD TO SEE HOW IT FEELS. I WENT THREW ALOT WHEN HE WAS TAKEN WHAT ELSE DOES THESE SCHOOL WANT ME TO SERVE 25 YEARS TO LIFE ON LIES THERE TELLING OR EVEN LE SAME THING LIED TO THE COUNTY PROSECUTOR JUST SO I WOULD GET ARRESTED AND GET TIME HE THOUGHT AND IT TURNED OUT I DID WHAT I HAD TO DO NOT PROUD OF WHAT HAPPEN AND SHOULD KNOW ABOUT SEEKING MEDICAL ATTENTION FOR MY CHILD I AM DISABLED AND SICK OF GETTING TREATED BADLY HOW WOULD THEY LIKE IT IF I CALLED APS ON THEM FOR A CHANGE THEN THEY CAN COME AND ARREST THEM RIGHT OUT OF THE SCHOOL. NOW WE ARE HOMELESS AND THE CHILDREN ARE STAYING WITH A RELATIVE AND GUARDIAN AND THE SCHOOL WON'T LET THEM GO TO SCHOOL THERE BUT WANT THEM TO GO TO SCHOOL WHERE BULLYING IS ALLOWED REAL SMART THINKING ON A SCHOOL STAFF.
  • help
    I had my kids taken away over my sister and husband Dcs has lien over and over again I had been taken meds which had cause me to have false positive test and my Dcs worker won't take my paperwork from my doctor that said that so they keep saying I have drugs in my body my three little kids are in Foster home my four year old has had his mouth cut open and had to have stiches bruise all over his body which I have pictures of my two old has had a big black eye with a cut down his face my one year old has mark's on her face cut mouth and Dcs doesn't do anything about it my 15 year old is with his dad and my 16 year was with his dad their dad is his wife steal from Walmart sear and other place they do drugs and Dcs doesn't care they let them they now go to Doctor hospital anywhere else to get pain pills my son gets a check every on-the-job of 721 and his dad doesn't use any of it foe my son I had to go buy my son food cause they didn't have any my two son dad wife hit my 17 and lefted marks on him and Dcs didn't do anything about it they was going to put a lock on the food so my kids couldn't eat without asking and are now living with his wife dad cause they said they couldn't pay the Rent which is only 500 answer he works and make 9 an hour and work's 12 hour a day six days a week I need help I can give you my number There is slot more going on it's just easier if we talk over the phone or I'm person (317)628-3922 please help keep these are my kids and I Love them more than anything
  • help
    I had my kids taken away over my sister and husband Dcs has lien over and over again I had been taken meds which had cause me to have false positive test and my Dcs worker won't take my paperwork from my doctor that said that so they keep saying I have drugs in my body my three little kids are in Foster home my four year old has had his mouth cut open and had to have stiches bruise all over his body which I have pictures of my two old has had a big black eye with a cut down his face my one year old has mark's on her face cut mouth and Dcs doesn't do anything about it my 15 year old is with his dad and my 16 year was with his dad their dad is his wife steal from Walmart sear and other place they do drugs and Dcs doesn't care they let them they now go to Doctor hospital anywhere else to get pain pills my son gets a check every on-the-job of 721 and his dad doesn't use any of it foe my son I had to go buy my son food cause they didn't have any my two son dad wife hit my 17 and lefted marks on him and Dcs didn't do anything about it they was going to put a lock on the food so my kids couldn't eat without asking and are now living with his wife dad cause they said they couldn't pay the Rent which is only 500 answer he works and make 9 an hour and work's 12 hour a day six days a week I need help I can give you my number There is slot more going on it's just easier if we talk over the phone or I'm person (317)628-3922 please help keep these are my kids and I Love them more than anything
  • DCS FILED ABUSE/ NEGLECT
    DCS TOOK MY 17 YEAR OLD SON AWAY STATING I NEGLECTED HIM BECAUSE I DIDN'T PICK HIM UP FROM JUVENILE AFTER THREE HOURS. I CALLED THE POLICE TO HELP ME BECAUSE HE WAS FLIPPING OUT PUNCHING WALLS, CURSING AND I COULDNT calm him down. The police came and my son acted as if he had a gun or something so they locked him up. I explained to the juvenile that my son needs help; mental help and they thought that I just didn't want to be responsible for my child but the fact is that my son is A WARD OF THE STATE BECAUSE I WAS SUPPOSED TO HAVE NEGLECTED HIM AND NOW HE IS AT THE FOSTER PARENTS HOUSE DISPLAYING THE SAME ACTS THAT I TRIED NUMEROUS TIMES TO GET HIM HELP FOR. Bottom line is the FOSTER DAD doesn't want my child and now DCS want to just send him home without any counseling nor psychiatric evaluation. I told DCS that my child is doing drugs and so did his foster dad. I now have a abuse/neglect charge against me that is hindering me gaining employment and I was never notified by DCS.
  • NEED HELP WITH ATTORNEY IN SOUTHERN INDIANA
    Please contact me @812-283-7246 Thanks Mrs.Houglin
  • NEED HELP WITH ATTORNEY IN SOUTHERN INDIANA
    CLARK CO DCS INTENTIALLY MISLED COURTS AND NEGLECTED MY CHILDREN THEMSELVES BY PLACING THEM IN WORSE SITUATION AND NOT FOLLOWING THERE GUIDLINES AND LAWS FABRICATED EVIDENCE AND VIOLATING MY PARENTIAL RIGHTS 4 and 14 AMENDMENT OF THE US CONSTITUTION. FAILED TO CONDUCT PROPER BACK GROUND CHECKS PLACED MY GIRLS WITH INDUVIDUAL THAT HAD ALREADY LOST HER 3 KIDS DUE TO DCS. I NEED SOME HELP IVE CONTACTED THE OMBUDSMAN FOR INDIANA AND MADE COMPLAINT I NEED HELP SEEKING LEGAL REPRISENTATION IN GETTING MY BABIES BACK AND TO STOP THIS ABUSE THAT DCS IS CAUSING TO OUR CHILDREN. HELP PLEASE
    • Sueing the state as well dcs
      Please so we can discuss about my issues and concerns that have on suing the state my contact information is 260 387 9942
    • this just happend to me
      my step daughter has been beaten by her father..who with holds visits from us. she was finally taken from his home. we were made aware of all of this when my wife was made aware of a bench warrent and turned herself in. she was shown pictures of her daughter beaten black and blue and hand prints up and down her legs. DCS claims they tried to contact us and even had our number but there is no record of them contacting us...what can we do in this case. they wont give her daughter to us because they couldnt contact us...or rather didnt contact us.
    • DCS IS PULLING SHADY THING WITH US
      Our son was taken at 4monthes old they said he was taken because of neglect and abuse and not being cared for but this is not the situation they keep changing things on the papers and tricked us into signing a CHINS paper we Need HELP we want our son back its been almost 10months and still the same crap

    Post a comment to this story

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Indiana State Bar Association

    Indianapolis Bar Association

    Evansville Bar Association

    Allen County Bar Association

    Indiana Lawyer on Facebook

    facebook
    ADVERTISEMENT
    Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
    1. Such things are no more elections than those in the late, unlamented Soviet Union.

    2. It appears the police and prosecutors are allowed to change the rules halfway through the game to suit themselves. I am surprised that the congress has not yet eliminated the right to a trial in cases involving any type of forensic evidence. That would suit their foolish law and order police state views. I say we eliminate the statute of limitations for crimes committed by members of congress and other government employees. Of course they would never do that. They are all corrupt cowards!!!

    3. Poor Judge Brown probably thought that by slavishly serving the godz of the age her violations of 18th century concepts like due process and the rule of law would be overlooked. Mayhaps she was merely a Judge ahead of her time?

    4. in a lawyer discipline case Judge Brown, now removed, was presiding over a hearing about a lawyer accused of the supposedly heinous ethical violation of saying the words "Illegal immigrant." (IN re Barker) http://www.in.gov/judiciary/files/order-discipline-2013-55S00-1008-DI-429.pdf .... I wonder if when we compare the egregious violations of due process by Judge Brown, to her chiding of another lawyer for politically incorrectness, if there are any conclusions to be drawn about what kind of person, what kind of judge, what kind of apparatchik, is busy implementing the agenda of political correctness and making off-limits legit advocacy about an adverse party in a suit whose illegal alien status is relevant? I am just asking the question, the reader can make own conclsuion. Oh wait-- did I use the wrong adjective-- let me rephrase that, um undocumented alien?

    5. of course the bigger questions of whether or not the people want to pay for ANY bussing is off limits, due to the Supreme Court protecting the people from DEMOCRACY. Several decades hence from desegregation and bussing plans and we STILL need to be taking all this taxpayer money to combat mostly-imagined "discrimination" in the most obviously failed social program of the postwar period.

    ADVERTISEMENT