ILNews

Case asks whether school board members can run for political office

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

A Lake Superior judge may not be breaking any new legal ground with an election-related ruling this week, but he’s set the stage for an appeal that could clear up confusion about whether nonpartisan school board members must give up their right to run for a public office that requires the candidate to declare their political party affiliation.

The ruling by Lake Superior Judge Jesse Villalpando came in George T. Janiec v. Lake County Board of Election and Registration, No. 45D12-1103-MI-00014. Hammond school board member George Janiec wants to run as a Republican against incumbent Democratic city mayor Thomas McDermott Jr. in the May 3 primary. The Democratic Party members of the Lake County Elections Board agreed to remove Janiec from the ballot on grounds that state statute prevents local school board members from political campaigning. If Janiec wants to run for mayor, he must first resign from the school board.

Janiec appealed to the trial court. Judge Villalpando on Wednesday ruled against him and found that he should essentially remove himself from the ballot. At issue is whether Janiec breached an implied statutory duty outlined in Indiana Code Section 20-25-3-3(c)(4) that he wouldn’t be influenced by any political considerations once he took the school board seat July 1, 2010, but did just that when declaring his candidacy for the partisan municipal mayor seat in February.

In his ruling, the judge wrote, “The court finds as a matter of law that the Election Board acted consistent with legislative authority pursuant to: I.C. 20-25-3-3(c)(4), contrary to the legal authority cited in either Petitioner’s or Respondent’s legal memoranda. I.C. 20-25-3-3 specifically applies to the question of conduct to which eligible school board members must adhere. This statute is unambiguous and spot on as it applies to the operative facts of this case.”

Judge Villalpando wrote this isn’t a case of first impression as the election board attorney James Weiser argued, and that the petitioner’s attorneys Cordell Funk and William Fine are also incorrect in saying the election board created a new standard in denying Janiec’s candidacy.

In his 10-page ruling, the judge cited a code of ethics adopted by the School City of Hammond and the Indiana School Board Association that states board members should refuse to "'play politics in either the traditional, partisan or in any petty sense." The Indiana Supreme Court dictated the limited judicial review applicable in this case in its ruling, LTV Steel v Griffin, and using that case, Judge Villalpando ruled that Janiec alone created the condition that undermined his candidacy for mayor according to any straightforward examination of I.C. 20-25-3-3(c)(4). As a result, the Election Board did not abuse its discretion in its March 7th ruling barring Janiec’s candidacy.

The holding is limited to the specific operative facts stated in Janiec’s case and is not intended to establish new policies pertaining to school board members’ constitutionally protected political activities, other than filing a declaration of candidacy for partisan municipal office while holding a nonpartisan office.

But whether the judge intends for this to be a broad stroke or not, history shows that others have done what Janiec is being barred from doing now.

Four decades ago, Hammond school board member Ralph Potesta used his position to win election as a Republican to the Indiana Senate, and currently two other Lake County school board members remain on the May 3 primary ballot for city council seats despite their current positions. Gary School Board trustee LaBrenda King-Smith faced a challenge in her running for city council but that failed on technical grounds. Lake Station School Board member Michael Stills is running for an at-large City Council seat and has been unchallenged.

A notice of appeal in Janiec’s case was filed following a hearing on Thursday, but nothing yet appears on the appellate docket. This issue is on a truncated time table because early voting begins on Monday.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Ð?ажнаÑ? Ð?Ð?ФÐ?РÐ?Ð?ЦÐ?Я о войне в Ð?ивии
    Ð?амÑ? и Ð?оÑ?пода!

    Ð?Ñ?ли вÑ? инÑ?еÑ?еÑ?Ñ?еÑ?еÑ?Ñ? немного полиÑ?икой, Ñ?о должнÑ? бÑ?ли замеÑ?иÑ?Ñ? - Ñ?Ñ?и неожиданнÑ?е волнениÑ? в Ñ?Ñ?Ñ?анаÑ? Ð?Ñ?Ñ?ики
    возникли неÑ?пÑ?оÑ?Ñ?а.

    Ð?Ñ?Ñ?Ñ? 2 веÑ?Ñ?ии Ñ?Ñ?иÑ? Ñ?обÑ?Ñ?ий - "оÑ?иÑ?иалÑ?наÑ?" и "неоÑ?иÑ?иалÑ?наÑ?", и обе веÑ?Ñ?ии Ñ?коÑ?ее Ñ?водÑ?Ñ? в Ñ?Ñ?оÑ?онÑ? оÑ? Ñ?еалÑ?нÑ?Ñ? Ñ?акÑ?ов.
    Ð?еÑ?Ñ?иÑ? 1: Ð?аддаÑ?и - Ñ?иÑ?ан и Ñ?амодеÑ?жеÑ?, Ñ?Ñ?Ñ?елÑ?л в миÑ?нÑ?Ñ? гÑ?аждан, поÑ?Ñ?омÑ? его надо бÑ? Ñ?бÑ?аÑ?Ñ?.
    Ð?еÑ?Ñ?иÑ? 2: на Ñ?амом деле Ð?вÑ?опе Ñ? Ð?меÑ?икой заÑ?оÑ?елоÑ?Ñ? немного Ð?ивийÑ?кой неÑ?Ñ?и, и они Ñ?еÑ?или навеÑ?Ñ?и неболÑ?Ñ?ой "дебоÑ?"

    РаÑ?Ñ?моÑ?Ñ?им веÑ?Ñ?иÑ? 1.
    Ð?а, Ð?аддаÑ?и Ñ?же Ñ?оÑ? еÑ?Ñ? Ñ?Ñ?аÑ?ик, емÑ? конеÑ?но поÑ?а бÑ? и на пенÑ?иÑ?. Ð?о извеÑ?Ñ?но ли вам, Ñ?Ñ?о конкÑ?еÑ?но в Ð?ивии
    наÑ?од имееÑ? веÑ?Ñ?ма вÑ?Ñ?окие пÑ?еÑ?еÑ?енÑ?ии пÑ?и его пÑ?авлении? УÑ?иÑ?елÑ? полÑ?Ñ?аÑ?Ñ? под $3.000, вÑ?плаÑ?Ñ? безÑ?абоÑ?нÑ?м
    поÑ?Ñ?дка $1000 и Ñ?ак далее. Ð?а, он Ñ?Ñ?ал Ñ?кÑ?оÑ?аÑ?Ñ? гÑ?Ñ?ппки взбÑ?нÑ?овавÑ?иÑ?Ñ?Ñ? бедÑ?инов, но кÑ?о-нибÑ?дÑ? понимаеÑ?
    Ñ?еалÑ?нÑ?е пÑ?иÑ?инÑ? Ñ?Ñ?иÑ? бÑ?нÑ?ов?
    ЭÑ?а веÑ?Ñ?иÑ? не вÑ?деÑ?живаеÑ? никакой кÑ?иÑ?ики.

    Ð?еÑ?Ñ?иÑ? 2.
    Ð?еÑ?Ñ?Ñ? Ð?ивии? Ð?а, она оÑ?лиÑ?аеÑ?Ñ?Ñ? вÑ?Ñ?оким каÑ?еÑ?Ñ?вом, Ð?ивийÑ?каÑ? неÑ?Ñ?Ñ? оÑ?енÑ? Ñ?иÑ?Ñ?аÑ?. Ð?о еÑ? Ñ?ам не Ñ?ак много.
    Ð?а и к Ñ?омÑ? же, заÑ?ем Ñ?огда бÑ?доÑ?ажиÑ?Ñ? Ð?гипеÑ? и пÑ?оÑ?ие аÑ?Ñ?иканÑ?кие гоÑ?Ñ?даÑ?Ñ?Ñ?ва, коÑ?оÑ?Ñ?е веÑ?Ñ? пÑ?оÑ?лÑ?й
    год вообÑ?е никого не Ñ?Ñ?евожили и не волновали?! Ð? Ñ?Ñ?Ñ? вдÑ?Ñ?г - "Ñ?иÑ?анÑ?", "извеÑ?ги" и Ñ?.п.

    Ð?а, Ñ?Ñ?а Ñ?иÑ?Ñ?аÑ?иÑ? дополниÑ?елÑ?но подогÑ?ела Ñ?енÑ? на неÑ?Ñ?Ñ?. Ð?Ñ?делÑ?нÑ?м коÑ?поÑ?аÑ?иÑ?м Ñ?Ñ?о вÑ?годно.

    Ð?о иÑ?Ñ?ина коÑ?оÑ?е.
    Ð?аддаÑ?и не Ñ?ак давно наÑ?ал обÑ?единÑ?Ñ?Ñ? ближневоÑ?Ñ?оÑ?нÑ?е Ñ?Ñ?Ñ?анÑ? под идеей пеÑ?ейÑ?и на Ñ?аÑ?Ñ?Ñ?Ñ?
    за неÑ?Ñ?Ñ? и Ñ?оваÑ?Ñ? Ð?Ð? доллаÑ?ами, Ð?Ð? евÑ?о, а алÑ?Ñ?еÑ?наÑ?ивой вÑ?емÑ? Ñ?Ñ?омÑ?. Ð? Ð?гипеÑ? - одна из Ñ?Ñ?Ñ?ан,
    коÑ?оÑ?аÑ? Ñ?Ñ?о поддеÑ?жала...

    Ð?одÑ?обнее - здеÑ?Ñ?:
    http://sterligov.livejournal.com/4389.html

    Ð?днако в попÑ?лÑ?Ñ?нÑ?Ñ? СÐ?Ð? Ñ?Ñ?о никогда не Ñ?кажÑ?Ñ?.

    P.S. У Саддама Ð¥Ñ?Ñ?ейна, кÑ?Ñ?аÑ?и, Ñ?оже бÑ?ли Ñ?акие наÑ?инаниÑ?. Ð?ообÑ?е, поÑ?ле кÑ?изиÑ?а оооÑ?енÑ? многие
    Ñ?Ñ?Ñ?анÑ? Ñ?Ñ?али задÑ?мÑ?ваÑ?Ñ?Ñ?Ñ? об Ð?Ð?Ð?Ð?Ð?Ð?Ð?Ð?Ð?Ð? Ð?Т Ð?Ð?Ð?Ð?СÐ?Ð?Ð?СТÐ? Ð?Т Ð?Ð?Ð?Ð?Ð?РÐ?. Рано или поздно
    Ñ?Ñ?о пÑ?оизойдÑ?Ñ?. ФРС Ñ?же некÑ?да понижаÑ?Ñ? Ñ?Ñ?авки.

    РаÑ?пÑ?оÑ?Ñ?Ñ?аниÑ?е Ñ?Ñ?о где Ñ?можеÑ?е. Ð?Ñ?ди должнÑ? знаÑ?Ñ? пÑ?авдÑ?.


    Ð?Ñ?Ñ?аÑ?и, Ñ?Ñ?о Ñ?оже по Ñ?еме: Ð?еликобÑ?иÑ?аниÑ? оÑ?Ñ?иÑ?алаÑ?Ñ? об Ñ?ниÑ?Ñ?ожении ливийÑ?киÑ? Ð?Ð?С, огнÑ?, Ð?еликобÑ?иÑ?аниÑ? пÑ?имеÑ? Ñ?Ñ?аÑ?Ñ?ие в военной опеÑ?аÑ?ии в Ð?ивии, Ñ?бÑ?оÑ?или, РоÑ?Ñ?иÑ? оÑ?казалаÑ?Ñ? Ñ?Ñ?аÑ?Ñ?воваÑ?Ñ? в военной опеÑ?аÑ?ии в Ð?ивии, Ð?, СÐ? Ð?Ð?Ð? пÑ?инÑ?л Ñ?езолÑ?Ñ?иÑ? по Ð?ивии, о

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Indiana State Bar Association

Indianapolis Bar Association

Evansville Bar Association

Allen County Bar Association

Indiana Lawyer on Facebook

facebook
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. I was wondering about the 6 million put aside for common attorney fees?does that mean that if you are a plaintiff your attorney fees will be partially covered?

  2. My situation was hopeless me and my husband was on the verge of divorce. I was in a awful state and felt that I was not able to cope with life any longer. I found out about this great spell caster drlawrencespelltemple@hotmail.com and tried him. Well, he did return and now we are doing well again, more than ever before. Thank you so much Drlawrencespelltemple@hotmail.comi will forever be grateful to you Drlawrencespelltemple@hotmail.com

  3. I expressed my thought in the title, long as it was. I am shocked that there is ever immunity from accountability for ANY Government agency. That appears to violate every principle in the US Constitution, which exists to limit Government power and to ensure Government accountability. I don't know how many cases of legitimate child abuse exist, but in the few cases in which I knew the people involved, in every example an anonymous caller used DCS as their personal weapon to strike at innocent people over trivial disagreements that had no connection with any facts. Given that the system is vulnerable to abuse, and given the extreme harm any action by DCS causes to families, I would assume any degree of failure to comply with the smallest infraction of personal rights would result in mandatory review. Even one day of parent-child separation in the absence of reasonable cause for a felony arrest should result in severe penalties to those involved in the action. It appears to me, that like all bureaucracies, DCS is prone to interpret every case as legitimate. This is not an accusation against DCS. It is a statement about the nature of bureaucracies, and the need for ADDED scrutiny of all bureaucratic actions. Frankly, I question the constitutionality of bureaucracies in general, because their power is delegated, and therefore unaccountable. No Government action can be unaccountable if we want to avoid its eventual degeneration into irrelevance and lawlessness, and the law of the jungle. Our Constitution is the source of all Government power, and it is the contract that legitimizes all Government power. To the extent that its various protections against intrusion are set aside, so is the power afforded by that contract. Eventually overstepping the limits of power eliminates that power, as a law of nature. Even total tyranny eventually crumbles to nothing.

  4. Being dedicated to a genre keeps it alive until the masses catch up to the "trend." Kent and Bill are keepin' it LIVE!! Thank you gentlemen..you know your JAZZ.

  5. Hemp has very little THC which is needed to kill cancer cells! Growing cannabis plants for THC inside a hemp field will not work...where is the fear? From not really knowing about Cannabis and Hemp or just not listening to the people teaching you through testimonies and packets of info over the last few years! Wake up Hoosier law makers!

ADVERTISEMENT