ILNews

Centralized hotline and hiring more workers among issues on DCS study committee agenda

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The centralized hotline system is among the topics to be discussed when the Department of Child Services Interim Study Committee meets Nov. 8.

Committee co-chairman Sen. Travis Holdman, R-Markle, said he and the committee’s other co-chair, Rep. Cindy Noe, R-Indianapolis, will offer a framework to transform the central call center into a hybrid system.

Under their proposal, school officials, law enforcement officers, medical professionals, judges and mental health workers would be given direct access to the local child agency office in their communities. Calls from anonymous individuals and others would be routed through the centralized call center.

Separating the calls would help ease the workload at the local level by sending the higher substantiated information straight to the community office while allowing the central office to skim off the lower substantiated tips, Holdman said.

The co-chairs will also recommend the addition of more than 100 new DCS workers spread between the local offices and the centralized call center. Along with eliminating the wait time, Holdman said they believe more workers will improve efficiency and reduce turnover.

The senator is expecting to meet some resistance from the Democrats on the committee who want to abandon the centralized hotline altogether. He does not want to scrap the hotline because of the amount of the investment made in it and, by separating out certain calls, he believes the centralized system can maximize the time of a worker in the field.

Since August, the DCS interim study committee has met four times and is scheduled to meet twice in November. A meeting on Oct. 25 was cancelled.

Thursday’s session will be held in the Indiana Government Center South, at the request of Holdman. He wanted all the committee members to be able to sit at one table and look at each other while they discuss the issues and suggestions related to DCS. No outside parties will give testimony during this meeting.

Holdman and Noe have met several times with DCS officials to examine about 70 issues related to the agency. They have developed potential solutions to some of the issues and will offer those during the meeting.  


 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. Just an aside, but regardless of the outcome, I 'm proud of Judge William Hughes. He was the original magistrate on the Home place issue. He ruled for Home Place, and was primaried by Brainard for it. Their tool Poindexter failed to unseat Hughes, who won support for his honesty and courage throughout the county, and he was reelected Judge of Hamilton County's Superior Court. You can still stand for something and survive. Thanks, Judge Hughes!

  2. CCHP's real accomplishment is the 2015 law signed by Gov Pence that basically outlaws any annexation that is forced where a 65% majority of landowners in the affected area disagree. Regardless of whether HP wins or loses, the citizens of Indiana will not have another fiasco like this. The law Gov Pence signed is a direct result of this malgovernance.

  3. I gave tempparry guardship to a friend of my granddaughter in 2012. I went to prison. I had custody. My daughter went to prison to. We are out. My daughter gave me custody but can get her back. She was not order to give me custody . but now we want granddaughter back from friend. She's 14 now. What rights do we have

  4. This sure is not what most who value good governance consider the Rule of Law to entail: "In a letter dated March 2, which Brizzi forwarded to IBJ, the commission dismissed the grievance “on grounds that there is not reasonable cause to believe that you are guilty of misconduct.”" Yet two month later reasonable cause does exist? (Or is the commission forging ahead, the need for reasonable belief be damned? -- A seeming violation of the Rules of Profession Ethics on the part of the commission) Could the rule of law theory cause one to believe that an explanation is in order? Could it be that Hoosier attorneys live under Imperial Law (which is also a t-word that rhymes with infamy) in which the Platonic guardians can do no wrong and never owe the plebeian class any explanation for their powerful actions. (Might makes it right?) Could this be a case of politics directing the commission, as celebrated IU Mauer Professor (the late) Patrick Baude warned was happening 20 years ago in his controversial (whisteblowing) ethics lecture on a quite similar topic: http://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1498&context=ilj

  5. I have a case presently pending cert review before the SCOTUS that reveals just how Indiana regulates the bar. I have been denied licensure for life for holding the wrong views and questioning the grand inquisitors as to their duties as to state and federal constitutional due process. True story: https://www.scribd.com/doc/299040839/2016Petitionforcert-to-SCOTUS Shorter, Amici brief serving to frame issue as misuse of govt licensure: https://www.scribd.com/doc/312841269/Thomas-More-Society-Amicus-Brown-v-Ind-Bd-of-Law-Examiners

ADVERTISEMENT