ILNews

Changing how state appeals are started

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

For the first time in Indiana’s history, lawyers and litigants will no longer be able to file appeals the way it has typically been done.

A new Indiana Supreme Court rule amendment that took effect Jan. 1, 2012, requires all appeal notices be filed with the Indiana Appellate Clerk’s Office in Indianapolis – instead of the local jurisdiction – within 30 days of a final judgment.

appeals Case manager Lue Hilliard processes appellate documents at the Indiana Appellate Clerk’s Office, stamping the papers to note they’ve been filed.. (IBJ Photo/ Perry Reichanadter)

While some questions remain about how the new process will play out, the legal community does have a two-year grace period before parties lose the right to appeal by not filing the documentation in the correct place.

“From a foundational level, this is the biggest change we’ve ever seen on how the appeals process gets started,” said Indianapolis attorney Maggie Smith, immediate past chair of the Indiana State Bar Association’s Appellate Practice Section and member of the Indiana Supreme Court’s Committee on Rules of Practice and Procedure. “We’re at a point we haven’t seen before, and there’s some open questions about how this will all work.”

The Indiana Supreme Court in September issued an order amending Indiana Appellate Procedure Rule 9 on the filing of a notice of appeal. Historically, attorneys would file a brief notice of appeal form in the local jurisdiction where a final judgment was issued and serve notice on the appellate clerk’s office to start the process.

In studying this rule change, Maggie Smith said some significant problems were discovered. Although the existing rules said a party was supposed to file in the trial court and serve a copy on the appellate court to allow for monitoring of that case to begin, it wasn’t working that way in practice. In about 30 percent of cases, the appellant wasn’t serving the Court of Appeals notice of the appeal, even though the other parties and trial court were already sending the case records to the appellate level.

It was also discovered that some trial courts in Indiana were denying a party’s notice of appeal or dismissing the appeal outright when they didn’t have that authority, Maggie Smith said. The ISBA Appellate Practice Section reported this was not an uncommon practice, she added.

“We (on the Rules Committee) receive complaints about how certain rules are applied, so we have to sit down and decide if this is an issue where a rule is insufficient or it’s just not being followed,” she said. “Most rank and file of the bar fall into the category of saying the rule is sufficient, but it’s just not being followed.”

In addition to changing where the notice is filed, the revised rule requires that the notice of appeal contain information such as the names of the parties and counsel; trial information; the date and title of the judgment or order appealed; the date on which any motion to correct error was denied or deemed denied; the basis for appellate jurisdiction; preparation of the clerk’s record; transcript preparation; whether all or any portion of the court records were sealed or excluded from public access by court order; and whether the appellant is willing to participate in alternative dispute resolution.

Unless the notice of appeal is timely filed, the right to appeal will be forfeited. A two–year grace period is in effect until Jan. 1, 2014, for an appellant that timely files the appeal notice with the trial court clerk or administrative agency instead of the state appellate clerk’s office as required.

Appellate Clerk Kevin Smith says these new notices of appeal won’t be subject to the notice of defect process, and they’ll be forwarded to the Court of Appeals without review by the clerk’s office. He said about 15 to 20 percent of defects in the past have dealt with appellant case summaries from attorneys and pro se litigants.

“Attorneys shouldn’t be thinking we’re going to be operating as gatekeepers to catch non-substantive defects, as we have before,” he said. “We think this will free up our case managers to file more paper because they won’t be reviewing mistakes.”

But questions remain about whether the grace period extends to the other rule revisions, such as the content of the notice. Some wonder if the appeal is forfeited if an attorney or party files in the correct place, but doesn’t include the correct materials.

Big firm attorneys say they’re changing the language and process used for how they file appeals to comply with the new party listings that now must be included. Smaller firms and solo practitioners who don’t file as many appeals say they’re more concerned about the amount of work that might go into preparing an appellate notice within those 30 days rather than the additional months they’d have to prepare them under the former rules.

“Most significant isn’t necessarily where one files, but the nature of the appeal,” said Bloomington appellate attorney Karen Wyle. “This new process has engulfed and replaced the appellate case summary and makes it much more complicated.”

Wyle said the process has traditionally been equivalent to telling the trial court clerk one’s appealing the case, so the county will need to start preparing the docket and record. She’s walked people through the process pro se before, but now Wyle worries this change could limit the number of self-represented litigants.

“This makes me nervous,” she said. “This means you have to know your way around to get the right documents and be able to know what they mean. It’s more work sooner, especially when someone calls me at the last-minute with only a couple days left before the deadline.”

To comply with a 30-day deadline, Wyle predicts some attorneys might have to take an appeal and then rework any retainer fee agreement so that they have the ability to later withdraw if they learn the case might not be a viable appeal.

Addressing some of the concerns, Maggie Smith said while the notice may look like it is more work up front, she said it is about 20 percent of what had been required before.

“That’s the tension between making rule changes. You can sit back here and theoretically say, if you’re an appellate attorney, you need to know the rules governing the practice, just like if you’re going into a local court before you go into the court.

“Attorneys don’t operate that way, and they go off past experiences. That’s likely no longer good (enough) for what the courts require. But if someone doesn’t open the rule book or hasn’t attended CLE in four years, those practitioners are going to find themselves in trouble on several fronts. More people will probably learn about this by doing it wrong, by getting a letter from the Court of Appeals. At least for the first two years, you won’t have the appeal dismissed,” she said.

The ISBA Appellate Practice Section plans to travel statewide during the next year offering free CLE to anyone who wants to know more about the rule change. Maggie Smith also said the ISBA plans to hold educational sessions for court reporters, court clerks and trial judges to learn more about the changes.•

ADVERTISEMENT

  • grace period
    Hi, Karen. The quote above was talking about where you file. You're 100% correct that, as written, the grace period does not apply to content defects. That remains to be an issue for the Court of Appeals.

    In the past, non-substantive defects in a Notice of Appeal were insufficient to dismiss an appeal. The big and unresolved question is whether the new content required in the Notice of Appeal will be considered non-substantive.

    I think it is reasonable to argue that what was required in the old Notice of Appeal is the substantive part, and the new content required as a result of the Case Summary being abolished is not substantive since it wasn't required before. But that's just my opinion . . .
  • [whoops - grammar correction]
    (That should have read: "... if the content ... fails to conform")
  • Will grace period apply to contents of Notice of Appeal?
    I hope Maggie Smith is correct that appeals will not be dismissed within the two-year grace period if the contents -- rather than the place of filing -- fails to conform to the new rules. The grace period applies explicitly to filing in the wrong place, and says nothing about filing the obsolete short form of Notice.

    Post a comment to this story

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT
    Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
    1. Hello everyone am precious from the united state of America am here to testify in the name of this great man who has brought back happiness into my family after my lover Chris left me for 3years for another woman,i really loved Chris because he was my first love i tried everything within my power to get Chris back to my life but people i met just kept on scamming me and lying to me,Then normally on Saturdays i do go out to make my hair and get some stuff,Then i had people discussing at the saloon if they do listen to there radio well,That there is a program (how i got back my ex)And started talking much about Dr EDDY how this man has helped lots of people in bringing back there lover,So immediately i went close to those ladies i met at the saloon and i explained things to them they said i should try and contact Dr EDDY that he has been the talk of the town and people are really contacting him for help immediately we searched on the internet and read great things about Dr EDDY i now got all Dr EDDY contact instantly at the saloon i gave Dr EDDY a call and i shared my problem with him he just told me not to worry that i should just be happy,He just told me to send him some few details which i did,And then he got back to me that everything would be okay within 36hours i was so happy then Dr EDDY did his work and he did not fail me,My lover Chris came to me in tears and apologized to me for leaving me in deep pain for good 3years,So he decided to prove that he will never leave me for any reason he made me had access to his account and made me his next of kin on all his will,Now the most perfect thing is that he can't spend a minute without seeing me or calling me,Am so grateful to Dr EDDY for bringing back the happiness which i lack for years,Please contact Dr EDDY for help he is a trustworthy man in email is dreddyspiritualtemple@gmail.com or you can call him or whatsapp him with this number...+23408160830324 (1)If you want your ex back. (2) if you always have bad dreams. (3)You want to be promoted in your office. (4)You want women/men to run after you. (5)If you want a child. (6)[You want to be rich. (7)You want to tie your husband/wife to be yours forever. (8)If you need financial assistance. (9)If you want to stop your Divorce. 10)Help bringing people out of prison. (11)Marriage Spells (12)Miracle Spells (13)Beauty Spells (14)PROPHECY CHARM (15)Attraction Spells (16)Evil Eye Spells. (17)Kissing Spell (18)Remove Sickness Spells. (19)ELECTION WINNING SPELLS. (20)SUCCESS IN EXAMS SPELLS. (21) Charm to get who to love you. CONTACT:dreddyspiritualtemple@gmail.com

    2. The appellate court just said doctors can be sued for reporting child abuse. The most dangerous form of child abuse with the highest mortality rate of any form of child abuse (between 6% and 9% according to the below listed studies). Now doctors will be far less likely to report this form of dangerous child abuse in Indiana. If you want to know what this is, google the names Lacey Spears, Julie Conley (and look at what happened when uninformed judges returned that child against medical advice), Hope Ybarra, and Dixie Blanchard. Here is some really good reporting on what this allegation was: http://media.star-telegram.com/Munchausenmoms/ Here are the two research papers: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0145213487900810 http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0145213403000309 25% of sibling are dead in that second study. 25%!!! Unbelievable ruling. Chilling. Wrong.

    3. MELISA EVA VALUE INVESTMENT Greetings to you from Melisa Eva Value Investment. We offer Business and Personal loans, it is quick and easy and hence can be availed without any hassle. We do not ask for any collateral or guarantors while approving these loans and hence these loans require minimum documentation. We offer great and competitive interest rates of 2% which do not weigh you down too much. These loans have a comfortable pay-back period. Apply today by contacting us on E-mail: melisaeva9@gmail.com WE DO NOT ASK FOR AN UPFRONT FEE. BEWARE OF SCAMMERS AND ONLINE FRAUD.

    4. Mr. Levin says that the BMV engaged in misconduct--that the BMV (or, rather, someone in the BMV) knew Indiana motorists were being overcharged fees but did nothing to correct the situation. Such misconduct, whether engaged in by one individual or by a group, is called theft (defined as knowingly or intentionally exerting unauthorized control over the property of another person with the intent to deprive the other person of the property's value or use). Theft is a crime in Indiana (as it still is in most of the civilized world). One wonders, then, why there have been no criminal prosecutions of BMV officials for this theft? Government misconduct doesn't occur in a vacuum. An individual who works for or oversees a government agency is responsible for the misconduct. In this instance, somebody (or somebodies) with the BMV, at some time, knew Indiana motorists were being overcharged. What's more, this person (or these people), even after having the error of their ways pointed out to them, did nothing to fix the problem. Instead, the overcharges continued. Thus, the taxpayers of Indiana are also on the hook for the millions of dollars in attorneys fees (for both sides; the BMV didn't see fit to avail itself of the services of a lawyer employed by the state government) that had to be spent in order to finally convince the BMV that stealing money from Indiana motorists was a bad thing. Given that the BMV official(s) responsible for this crime continued their misconduct, covered it up, and never did anything until the agency reached an agreeable settlement, it seems the statute of limitations for prosecuting these folks has not yet run. I hope our Attorney General is paying attention to this fiasco and is seriously considering prosecution. Indiana, the state that works . . . for thieves.

    5. I'm glad that attorney Carl Hayes, who represented the BMV in this case, is able to say that his client "is pleased to have resolved the issue". Everyone makes mistakes, even bureaucratic behemoths like Indiana's BMV. So to some extent we need to be forgiving of such mistakes. But when those mistakes are going to cost Indiana taxpayers millions of dollars to rectify (because neither plaintiff's counsel nor Mr. Hayes gave freely of their services, and the BMV, being a state-funded agency, relies on taxpayer dollars to pay these attorneys their fees), the agency doesn't have a right to feel "pleased to have resolved the issue". One is left wondering why the BMV feels so pleased with this resolution? The magnitude of the agency's overcharges might suggest to some that, perhaps, these errors were more than mere oversight. Could this be why the agency is so "pleased" with this resolution? Will Indiana motorists ever be assured that the culture of incompetence (if not worse) that the BMV seems to have fostered is no longer the status quo? Or will even more "overcharges" and lawsuits result? It's fairly obvious who is really "pleased to have resolved the issue", and it's not Indiana's taxpayers who are on the hook for the legal fees generated in these cases.

    ADVERTISEMENT