Indiana Supreme Court Chief Justice Randall T. Shepard and other jurists from the Midwest will talk about important issues
affecting their respective courts during a panel discussion Sept. 9 at Indiana University School of Law - Indianapolis.
Chief Justice Shepard; Chief Justice Thomas J. Moyer of the Supreme Court of Ohio; and former Chief Justice Laura Denvir
Stith of the Supreme Court of Missouri will address issues including access to justice, regulation of the legal profession,
relations with the executive and legislative branches, and other matters. If time permits, the panelists will take questions
from the audience.
IU - Indianapolis law professor Cynthia A. Baker will moderate the panel; the American Constitution Society's Indianapolis
Lawyer Chapter will host the event. The discussion is from noon to 1:30 p.m. in the Wynne Courtroom, 530 W. New York St.,
Indianapolis. The event is free and open to the public and people are encouraged to RSVP.
For more information, contact Dino Pollock at (312) 519-8573 or illinidp43@yahoo.com
ILNews
Chief justices to discuss court issues
IL Staff
August 19, 2009
Sponsored by
on Facebook & Twitter
on Facebook & Twitter
Indiana Lawyer on Facebook
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Back to TopCopyright © All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Use.
Design, CMS, Hosting & Web Development :: ePublishing.
Additional Hosting & Delivery by
Qualified immunity, means that if you wear a badge, you are exempt from law and free to do anything you please! The courts will back badge toting individuals, because they think they are above the law as well. They think, they have judicial immunity, they do not.
Deeply, deeply concerned? I'll bet if it was the judge's money that had been swindled we'd see deep concern with actual consequences. First a Ponzi scheme, then a shell game with the assets…c'mon, hasn't Conour abused the judicial system and his clients long enough? I say enough already.
Wow, just wow.
Forcing a defendant to wear a stun belt, in court or otherwise, is a violation of american principles! It is also unconstitutional!
So, if I save $100.00 cash per week, from my $500.00 per week paycheck, for 50 years, at which time, I will have saved $260,000.00, the government can raid my home and take my money, just by saying it is drug money! Shouldn't the government, have some kind of evidence of drugs, rather, than just saying we are the government and we will take anything you own, anytime we choose? Tyranny is upon us! If you don't know your rights, you don't have any!