ILNews

Chief public defender going to immigration firm

Michael W. Hoskins
January 1, 2008
Keywords
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
When Marion County's chief public defender steps down in February, he plans to work for an immigration and naturalization firm in Indianapolis.

David E. Cook, who's been the county's top public defender since 1995, submitted his resignation in December to the Marion County Public Defender's Office. He's continuing in the post until mid-February to allow time for a replacement to be found.

On Feb. 18, the 61-year-old attorney plans to join Gresk & Singleton in a new office being built at 10th and Delaware streets. The firm currently has an office on Meridian Street near the immigration office and will be relocating, Cook said.

Cook will focus on criminal defense at the firm, helping clients who may need some aspect of criminal law help that's intertwined with immigration or naturalization issues, he said. He will likely represent clients on criminal issues, and also work with immigration attorneys on post-conviction or other related issues that arise.

"It's been their experience that a high percentage of these cases have some type of criminal aspect, whether presently or in the past," Cook said. "That can have immigration consequences."

Partners at Gresk & Singleton couldn't be reached by Indiana Lawyer Daily deadline.

The county agency's public defender board of director's is searching for Cook's successor. A status meeting is scheduled for next week to discuss the process and applicants, who have until Feb. 1 to apply for the chief public defender position, Cook said. He added that about three names have been submitted so far, but he would not release those names.
ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Indiana State Bar Association

Indianapolis Bar Association

Evansville Bar Association

Allen County Bar Association

Indiana Lawyer on Facebook

facebook
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. Conour will never turn these funds over to his defrauded clients. He tearfully told the court, and his daughters dutifully pledged in interviews, that his first priority is to repay every dime of the money he stole from his clients. Judge Young bought it, much to the chagrin of Conour’s victims. Why would Conour need the $2,262 anyway? Taxpayers are now supporting him, paying for his housing, utilities, food, healthcare, and clothing. If Conour puts the money anywhere but in the restitution fund, he’s proved, once again, what a con artist he continues to be and that he has never had any intention of repaying his clients. Judge Young will be proven wrong... again; Conour has no remorse and the Judge is one of the many conned.

  2. Pass Legislation to require guilty defendants to pay for the costs of lab work, etc as part of court costs...

  3. The fee increase would be livable except for the 11% increase in spending at the Disciplinary Commission. The Commission should be focused on true public harm rather than going on witch hunts against lawyers who dare to criticize judges.

  4. Marijuana is safer than alcohol. AT the time the 1937 Marijuana Tax Act was enacted all major pharmaceutical companies in the US sold marijuana products. 11 Presidents of the US have smoked marijuana. Smoking it does not increase the likelihood that you will get lung cancer. There are numerous reports of canabis oil killing many kinds of incurable cancer. (See Rick Simpson's Oil on the internet or facebook).

  5. The US has 5% of the world's population and 25% of the world's prisoners. Far too many people are sentenced for far too many years in prison. Many of the federal prisoners are sentenced for marijuana violations. Marijuana is safer than alcohol.

ADVERTISEMENT