Chinn: 19th Annual Bench Bar: On The Merits

Scott Chinn
July 4, 2012
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

iba-chinn-scottThe Indianapolis Bar Association (“IndyBar”), by counsel, respectfully submits this appeal to its members and the Indiana legal community to recognize the success of the 19th Annual IndyBar Bench-Bar Conference (“IBA Bench Bar”) and to continue to support it in the future. In support of this pleading, the IndyBar shows as follows:

1. For the second year in a row, judge and lawyer members of the IndyBar descended on French Lick, Ind., for IBA Bench Bar.

2. During the daytime on Thursday, June 14, 2012, Bob York led approximately 40 golfers through the hills and dales of the Donald Ross “Hill Course” prompting so much excitement as to cause the IndyBar first vice president to make serious progress toward playing a second round before needing to return to the French Lick Springs Hotel for “hydration.”

3. Other IndyBar members were seen lounging by the pool.

4. On Thursday evening, a spectacular reception and dinner was held in the atrium of the West Baden Hotel. Just standing in that building never gets old. Much goodwill was exchanged and camaraderie felt by the participants. Also, it was remarked frequently that the food was quite good.

5. On Thursday night, judicial notice was taken regarding the great length of time that beverages will stay cold when iced down in the bath tub of a hospitality suite (and also that the beer ran out at some point).

6. Turning to the activities of Friday, June 15, 2012, Judge Tim Oakes and the members of his IBA Bench Bar Committee did a terrific job planning the conference. Of special note is the attention paid to programming, which was by consensus labeled a tremendous success. Criminal, civil, and family law, and mediation tracks filled the program. Basic and advanced practice topics as well as cutting edge legal policy issues were discussed.

7. Of special note this year was the programming designed for spouses of IBA Bench Bar participants. A planning committee of spouses made sure that their peers were not afterthoughts at IBA Bench Bar.

8. Also of special note is the attendance of more than 20 lawyers who received scholarships to defray the cost of the conference.

9. The “First Timers Reception” was held again on Friday evening. The Old Timers expressed how earnest and interesting the First Timers were – and that we need to find a way of mixing these groups more often.

10. The Friday night dinner was punctuated by the annual theme of finding the president’s appearance at the podium tiresome. But relief was enjoyed when comedian-turned-lawyer James Bell took the microphone to preside over the award of raffle prizes. Especially remarkable was the grace displayed by Bell’s sidekick David “Vanna White” Herzog.

11. Later on Friday night, the Indianapolis Bar Foundation took Trivia Night on the road from Indianapolis to French Lick. Bell shifted from his role as raffle MC to trivia proctor. A minor scuffle ensued during IBA Presidential Trivia, which prompted the hotel bartender to remark with words to the effect, “wow, you lawyers sure take this stuff seriously.” A small sum was netted for the IBF and a good time was had by all.

12. Apparently there was the customary ethics seminar on Saturday morning – also MC’ed by Bell. (The undersigned counsel was driving from French Lick to Ft. Wayne by that time in the morning and does not have first-hand knowledge of this program.)

13. In addition to the great work of Judge Oakes IBA Bench-Bar Committee, IndyBar Executive Director Julie Armstrong and staff members Mary Kay Price and Tara Moore, unsurprisingly, pulled off event operations with their usual effectiveness and charm.

WHEREFORE, the IndyBar respectfully requests the following relief:

A. That the 19th Annual IndyBar Bench Bar Conference be deemed an unqualified success;

B. That the generous sponsors of the conference be thanked again for making the event possible;

C. That it be recognized by those in attendance how truly fortunate we are to be part of the Indianapolis legal community and how the IBA Bench Bar Conference fosters important relationships among members of the bar;

D. That young lawyers be made aware that it is tantamount to professional malpractice not to attend the Bench Bar Conference if at all possible;

E. That our minds already be trained toward Louisville, Ky., the site of the historic 20th Annual IndyBar Bench Bar Conference, which will be a great success under the leadership of then-to-be President Kerry Blomquist; and

For all other just and proper relief.

Respectfully submitted,

A. Scott Chinn


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. I think the cops are doing a great job locking up criminals. The Murder rates in the inner cities are skyrocketing and you think that too any people are being incarcerated. Maybe we need to lock up more of them. We have the ACLU, BLM, NAACP, Civil right Division of the DOJ, the innocent Project etc. We have court system with an appeal process that can go on for years, with attorneys supplied by the government. I'm confused as to how that translates into the idea that the defendants are not being represented properly. Maybe the attorneys need to do more Pro-Bono work

  2. We do not have 10% of our population (which would mean about 32 million) incarcerated. It's closer to 2%.

  3. If a class action suit or other manner of retribution is possible, count me in. I have email and voicemail from the man. He colluded with opposing counsel, I am certain. My case was damaged so severely it nearly lost me everything and I am still paying dearly.

  4. There's probably a lot of blame that can be cast around for Indiana Tech's abysmal bar passage rate this last February. The folks who decided that Indiana, a state with roughly 16,000 to 18,000 attorneys, needs a fifth law school need to question the motives that drove their support of this project. Others, who have been "strong supporters" of the law school, should likewise ask themselves why they believe this institution should be supported. Is it because it fills some real need in the state? Or is it, instead, nothing more than a resume builder for those who teach there part-time? And others who make excuses for the students' poor performance, especially those who offer nothing more than conspiracy theories to back up their claims--who are they helping? What evidence do they have to support their posturing? Ultimately, though, like most everything in life, whether one succeeds or fails is entirely within one's own hands. At least one student from Indiana Tech proved this when he/she took and passed the February bar. A second Indiana Tech student proved this when they took the bar in another state and passed. As for the remaining 9 who took the bar and didn't pass (apparently, one of the students successfully appealed his/her original score), it's now up to them (and nobody else) to ensure that they pass on their second attempt. These folks should feel no shame; many currently successful practicing attorneys failed the bar exam on their first try. These same attorneys picked themselves up, dusted themselves off, and got back to the rigorous study needed to ensure they would pass on their second go 'round. This is what the Indiana Tech students who didn't pass the first time need to do. Of course, none of this answers such questions as whether Indiana Tech should be accredited by the ABA, whether the school should keep its doors open, or, most importantly, whether it should have even opened its doors in the first place. Those who promoted the idea of a fifth law school in Indiana need to do a lot of soul-searching regarding their decisions. These same people should never be allowed, again, to have a say about the future of legal education in this state or anywhere else. Indiana already has four law schools. That's probably one more than it really needs. But it's more than enough.

  5. This man Steve Hubbard goes on any online post or forum he can find and tries to push his company. He said court reporters would be obsolete a few years ago, yet here we are. How does he have time to search out every single post about court reporters and even spy in private court reporting forums if his company is so successful???? Dude, get a life. And back to what this post was about, I agree that some national firms cause a huge problem.