ILNews

Chinn: One of the Best Ways to Celebrate America's Birthday

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

iba-chinn-scottThere’s a lot I enjoy about being involved in the IndyBar. I must confess, though, that about the best thing I have been able to do a several times over the past few years is represent the IndyBar at naturalization ceremonies conducted by the United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana. A real privilege for me this year was being the IndyBar’s representative at the annual Independence Day naturalization ceremony held on July 3 at the Benjamin Harrison Home.

Yes, it was blisteringly hot that day, even under the tent. But it was worth it, as it always is. With Judge Sarah Evans Barker presiding, U.S. Attorney Joe Hogsett moved the admission of 98 new citizens hailing from dozens of countries across the globe. Various comments were delivered to mark the occasion, with some of the most interesting coming from Indiana University President Michael McRobbie, who was himself sworn in as a citizen just a few years ago, and from Yemane Gessesse, a Cummins engineer and member of the class of new citizens. There are a lot of moments during these events that tug at your heart and induce mist in your eyes, like when the eldest new citizen is provided a flag that’s flown over the U.S. Capitol and when the youngest new citizen leads all those assembled in the pledge of allegiance.

At the conclusion of the ceremony, our newest citizens are reminded that they can register to vote on site and are handed a variety of mementos to commemorate the event. In our case, we provide a booklet containing copies of the U.S. and Indiana Constitutions. I was able to hand one to each new citizen personally as I got to shake his or her hand and give congratulations.

If you’ve never been to a naturalization ceremony, you should try to remedy that. No matter what time of year the event is conducted, you’ll leave with a heart as warm as a July day.

Here’s an example of the traditional speech IndyBar representatives give at the ceremonies – this one was tailored for the Independence Day event:

As a representative of the Indianapolis Bar Association, I wish to extend my Association’s best wishes and congratulations on this joyous occasion. To welcome you as new Citizens of the United States and the State of Indiana is a unique pleasure. And it is especially exciting to do so at the home of President Benjamin Harrison, who was one of the founders of the Indianapolis Bar Association.

The Indianapolis Bar Association was formed more than 130 years ago for several important reasons. The most prominent were to advance the profession of law, to uphold and defend the constitution, to develop and maintain both integrity and impartiality in the administration of justice and to apply its knowledge and experience in the field of law to the promotion of the public good. Just as the members of the IndyBar have sworn to defend our Constitution, so have you. This is the common thread we share and the duty we both agree to bear.

Respect for the law plays an important role in American society. When we are at our best as Americans, we do three remarkable things because of our respect for the law. We resolve our differences without resort to violence, using our court system when appropriate. We safeguard the legal rights we possess under our constitutions and laws and respect the similar rights of others. And our governments and elected leaders transfer power peacefully when called upon to do so by the people. We demand this respect of ourselves and expect it of our fellow citizens.

To honor this occasion, the Indianapolis Bar will provide each of you with a book with the Constitutions of the United States and the State of Indiana. The rights and freedoms that we enjoy as United States Citizens are precious and unparalleled. Our hope is that this gift will remind you of the blessings of liberty and justice that we enjoy every day in our lives as Americans.

The Indianapolis Bar Association is proud to welcome you as citizens of this wonderful country.


Interested in taking part in this heart-warming volunteer opportunity? Contact Caren Chopp at cchopp@indybar.org to volunteer.•

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. Indiana's seatbelt law is not punishable as a crime. It is an infraction. Apparently some of our Circuit judges have deemed settled law inapplicable if it fails to fit their litmus test of political correctness. Extrapolating to redefine terms of behavior in a violation of immigration law to the entire body of criminal law leaves a smorgasbord of opportunity for judicial mischief.

  2. I wonder if $10 diversions for failure to wear seat belts are considered moral turpitude in federal immigration law like they are under Indiana law? Anyone know?

  3. What a fine article, thank you! I can testify firsthand and by detailed legal reports (at end of this note) as to the dire consequences of rejecting this truth from the fine article above: "The inclusion and expansion of this right [to jury] in Indiana’s Constitution is a clear reflection of our state’s intention to emphasize the importance of every Hoosier’s right to make their case in front of a jury of their peers." Over $20? Every Hoosier? Well then how about when your very vocation is on the line? How about instead of a jury of peers, one faces a bevy of political appointees, mini-czars, who care less about due process of the law than the real czars did? Instead of trial by jury, trial by ideological ordeal run by Orwellian agents? Well that is built into more than a few administrative law committees of the Ind S.Ct., and it is now being weaponized, as is revealed in articles posted at this ezine, to root out post moderns heresies like refusal to stand and pledge allegiance to all things politically correct. My career was burned at the stake for not so saluting, but I think I was just one of the early logs. Due, at least in part, to the removal of the jury from bar admission and bar discipline cases, many more fires will soon be lit. Perhaps one awaits you, dear heretic? Oh, at that Ind. article 12 plank about a remedy at law for every damage done ... ah, well, the founders evidently meant only for those damages done not by the government itself, rabid statists that they were. (Yes, that was sarcasm.) My written reports available here: Denied petition for cert (this time around): http://tinyurl.com/zdmawmw Denied petition for cert (from the 2009 denial and five year banishment): http://tinyurl.com/zcypybh Related, not written by me: Amicus brief: http://tinyurl.com/hvh7qgp

  4. Justice has finally been served. So glad that Dr. Ley can finally sleep peacefully at night knowing the truth has finally come to the surface.

  5. While this right is guaranteed by our Constitution, it has in recent years been hampered by insurance companies, i.e.; the practice of the plaintiff's own insurance company intervening in an action and filing a lien against any proceeds paid to their insured. In essence, causing an additional financial hurdle for a plaintiff to overcome at trial in terms of overall award. In a very real sense an injured party in exercise of their right to trial by jury may be the only party in a cause that would end up with zero compensation.

ADVERTISEMENT