ILNews

Chinn: Special Relationships

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

iba-chinn-scottA 2010 film called “The Special Relationship” depicts British Prime Minister Tony Blair’s important relationship with President Bill Clinton. The film traces the interactions between the leaders in the 1990s both in the contexts of the prosperity and the political tumult of those times. Originally, the movie’s screenplay was to deal with Blair’s relationship with both President Clinton and President George W. Bush. In the end, the director found the Blair-Clinton relationship too interesting not to receive the exclusive focus of the film and left the Bush story on the cutting room floor.

A special relationship exists between the Indianapolis Bar Foundation and the Indianapolis Bar Association. It is easy to think of the IBF as the “fund raising arm” of the IndyBar. And that isn’t wrong. Many metropolitan bar associations around the county have the support of separate bar foundations dedicated to raising money for bar programs. Indeed, so integrated are the layers of bar association management, operations and financing that the semi-annual and annual meetings of the National Association of Bar Executives, National Conference of Bar Presidents, and National Association of Bar Foundations are held jointly.

For the IBF’s part, its board – which is separate from the IndyBar’s board – establishes fundraising goals to maintain and grow a corpus of funds, the investment earnings from which are used to support the IndyBar. As just one example of the IBF’s efforts, on September 28, it held its annual “Evening Under the Stars” event which nets funds for the foundation from dinner tickets, sponsorships and proceeds from live and silent auctions. The event, held at the stately Scottish Rite Cathedral this year, was again a success to the credit of IBF President Kelly Scanlan, the event chair Erin Clancy and the many other volunteers and staff who helped put the dinner together.

But in focusing only on the IBF’s structural and financial relationship with the IndyBar, something important is missed that shouldn’t be left “on the cutting room floor,” if you will. And that is the impact of the IBF’s fundraising on real people in our community. Here are a couple of examples of how the IBF funding to the McKinney School’s Health and Human Rights Clinic – through your contributions – makes a difference in our community.

“A single mother on the near west side of Indianapolis was struggling with many repairs that needed to be made to her rental unit. She made repeated requests of her landlord, who refused to make repairs. She sought help from the Health Department, and in retaliation, her landlord began eviction proceedings. An attorney who received pro bono training from the Health and Human Rights Clinic now represents the mother and is working to keep her in her home and to obtain necessary repairs for the health and safety of the mother and her children.”

“A disabled and illiterate Indianapolis resident encountered difficulty making his mortgage payments, and found himself in danger of becoming homeless when the lender initiated foreclosure proceedings. An attorney who received pro bono training from the Health and Human Rights Clinic got involved, and secured a mortgage modification for the gentleman, who can now remain in his home.”

These are just two concrete examples of the good things accomplished through the work of the IBF. And they happen because lawyers generously make donations to the IBF. At the September 28 “Evening Under the Stars” dinner, I bid on several items but was unsuccessful (I even bid up Kelly Scanlan on an item during the live auction! Sorry Kelly). So, I will be making an additional contribution this month given that I had budgeted to spend on the auction.

I hope you too will consider making a contribution (or an additional one for those who’ve already given) to the IBF before year end. I am confident it will foster the continuation of the special relationships the IBF has with the IndyBar – and most importantly, with the Indianapolis community.

Want to support the IBF? Online donations can be made at www.indybar.org/about/bar-foundation-donation.•

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Indiana State Bar Association

Indianapolis Bar Association

Evansville Bar Association

Allen County Bar Association

Indiana Lawyer on Facebook

facebook
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. Family court judges never fail to surprise me with their irrational thinking. First of all any man who abuses his wife is not fit to be a parent. A man who can't control his anger should not be allowed around his child unsupervised period. Just because he's never been convicted of abusing his child doesn't mean he won't and maybe he hasn't but a man that has such poor judgement and control is not fit to parent without oversight - only a moron would think otherwise. Secondly, why should the mother have to pay? He's the one who made the poor decisions to abuse and he should be the one to pay the price - monetarily and otherwise. Yes it's sad that the little girl may be deprived of her father, but really what kind of father is he - the one that abuses her mother the one that can't even step up and do what's necessary on his own instead the abused mother is to pay for him???? What is this Judge thinking? Another example of how this world rewards bad behavior and punishes those who do right. Way to go Judge - NOT.

  2. Right on. Legalize it. We can take billions away from the drug cartels and help reduce violence in central America and more unwanted illegal immigration all in one fell swoop. cut taxes on the savings from needless incarcerations. On and stop eroding our fourth amendment freedom or whatever's left of it.

  3. "...a switch from crop production to hog production "does not constitute a significant change."??? REALLY?!?! Any judge that cannot see a significant difference between a plant and an animal needs to find another line of work.

  4. Why do so many lawyers get away with lying in court, Jamie Yoak?

  5. Future generations will be amazed that we prosecuted people for possessing a harmless plant. The New York Times came out in favor of legalization in Saturday's edition of the newspaper.

ADVERTISEMENT