ILNews

Chinn: Super February

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

iba-chinn-scottUsually, there would be no reason to expect February to be a “hot” month for the City and for the IndyBar. But this is no usual February.

The midyear meetings of the American Bar Association were held in New Orleans earlier this month. As bad luck would have it, the meetings overlapped Super Bowl week in Indianapolis and for some even Super Bowl Sunday itself. But despite the conflict, a number of IndyBar leaders made the trip to the Crescent City to take part in the meetings, to represent the IndyBar, and to fulfill various speaking obligations.

And let’s be honest, if you are going to miss a portion of the Super Bowl festivities in Indianapolis, New Orleans isn’t the worst place to drown your sorrows. The meeting week did start with a sense of foreboding in that when we arrived in New Orleans, we immediately saw on the television monitors that Punxsutawney Phil had committed us to six more weeks of winter. But after a brief bout of rodent-inspired profanity, the situation improved.

The IndyBar has long been a leader among bars in the country and that was on display during the meetings. IndyBar Past President and Metropolitan Bar Caucus Board Member John Kautzman moderated a panel on judicial selection issues at the National Conference of Bar Presidents (NCBP) meetings. And IndyBar Past President and NCBP Membership Committee Member Chris Hickey moderated an NCBP panel on strategies to attract and retain new members. Both panel discussions were very well received.

Another happy development in New Orleans was news that the Indianapolis Bar Foundation is the recipient of the National Conference of Bar Foundations (NCBF) Fundraising for Success Award for the IBF’s “Giving Level Improvement Program” – an initiative that raised funds from targeted donors at the end of the 2011 giving year and permitted the IBF to exceed its campaign goals for the year. I was pleased to make a presentation on that initiative and about the importance of IndyBar/IBF collaboration to a gathering of the NCBF representatives.

While we were in New Orleans, we received innumerable positive comments and well wishes from lawyers all over the country regarding the success of Super Bowl activities and coverage up to that point. There is no question that being from the IndyBar had some cache, because of the events in Indianapolis. And as heartwarming as that is, the point of the meetings is to learn about bar activities around the country and about trends in the profession. So, let me briefly recap three issues we heard about from our peers in other places.

First, there remains a deep concern about declining membership in many bars around the country. While IndyBar membership has actually been increasing over the past few years, our leadership is focused on making sure IndyBar members continue to derive value from membership. Because February is literally the “drop” deadline for IndyBar members that haven’t renewed, please take a moment to make sure that you have. We value your membership and your input.

Second, there was a discussion among metropolitan bars about the increased need for pro bono or subsidized legal services, especially in the family law area. That confirmed what we already know about our community. As we’ve communicated before, IndyBar has committed to take a more active role to assist the Heartland Pro Bono Council and to communicate with the local legal services providers. IndyBar Past President Mike Hebenstreit is leading that effort.

Finally, serious concerns persist about our new lawyer colleagues that are having trouble finding legal jobs. Some bars are trying pilot programs and engaging in other outreach efforts to help students find jobs, gain skills, and cope with hanging out their own shingles. We are “ears wide open” about those issues. I tend to think the most important thing we can do about this problem in the short term is informal – established lawyers spending time meeting and networking with new lawyers who are unemployed or underemployed. You may not have a job to offer, but you have some ideas, some wisdom, and some encouragement to offer – and these interactions inevitably lead to positive results down the road.

It’s good to be back in town, basking in the glow of a Super Bowl week well executed and that put some warmth (literally and figuratively) into February in a City that is usually a little bleak this time of year.

Stay warm.•

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Indiana State Bar Association

Indianapolis Bar Association

Evansville Bar Association

Allen County Bar Association

Indiana Lawyer on Facebook

facebook
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. You can put your photos anywhere you like... When someone steals it they know it doesn't belong to them. And, a man getting a divorce is automatically not a nice guy...? That's ridiculous. Since when is need of money a conflict of interest? That would mean that no one should have a job unless they are already financially solvent without a job... A photographer is also under no obligation to use a watermark (again, people know when a photo doesn't belong to them) or provide contact information. Hey, he didn't make it easy for me to pay him so I'll just take it! Well heck, might as well walk out of the grocery store with a cart full of food because the lines are too long and you don't find that convenient. "Only in Indiana." Oh, now you're passing judgement on an entire state... What state do you live in? I need to characterize everyone in your state as ignorant and opinionated. And the final bit of ignorance; assuming a photo anyone would want is lucky and then how much does your camera have to cost to make it a good photo, in your obviously relevant opinion?

  2. Seventh Circuit Court Judge Diane Wood has stated in “The Rule of Law in Times of Stress” (2003), “that neither laws nor the procedures used to create or implement them should be secret; and . . . the laws must not be arbitrary.” According to the American Bar Association, Wood’s quote drives home this point: The rule of law also requires that people can expect predictable results from the legal system; this is what Judge Wood implies when she says that “the laws must not be arbitrary.” Predictable results mean that people who act in the same way can expect the law to treat them in the same way. If similar actions do not produce similar legal outcomes, people cannot use the law to guide their actions, and a “rule of law” does not exist.

  3. Linda, I sure hope you are not seeking a law license, for such eighteenth century sentiments could result in your denial in some jurisdictions minting attorneys for our tolerant and inclusive profession.

  4. Mazel Tov to the newlyweds. And to those bakers, photographers, printers, clerks, judges and others who will lose careers and social standing for not saluting the New World (Dis)Order, we can all direct our Two Minutes of Hate as Big Brother asks of us. Progress! Onward!

  5. My daughter was taken from my home at the end of June/2014. I said I would sign the safety plan but my husband would not. My husband said he would leave the house so my daughter could stay with me but the case worker said no her mind is made up she is taking my daughter. My daughter went to a friends and then the friend filed a restraining order which she was told by dcs if she did not then they would take my daughter away from her. The restraining order was not in effect until we were to go to court. Eventually it was dropped but for 2 months DCS refused to allow me to have any contact and was using the restraining order as the reason but it was not in effect. This was Dcs violating my rights. Please help me I don't have the money for an attorney. Can anyone take this case Pro Bono?

ADVERTISEMENT