The City of Madison and a wastewater treatment plant operator have been charged with negligently violating the Clean Water
Act.
The U.S. Attorney Office filed charges Nov. 3 against the City of Madison and David W. Hawkins regarding a June 2007 incident.
Hawkins, superintendent of the city's wastewater treatment plant, contacted the Indiana Department of Environmental Management
in June 2007 for assistance when the wastewater plant began experiencing significant problems. IDEM officials said the biologic
organisms weren't providing treatment and Hawkins should immediately remove 90,000 gallons of water into a separate tank
in order to reseed the treatment system with live biologic organisms.
Instead, Hawkins left for the weekend without taking any actions. Partially treated and untreated waste and sewage got into
the Ohio River June 8-10, 2007, according to the charging information filed in the U.S. District Court, Southern District
of Indiana.
Hawkins faces up to one year in prison and a $100,000 fine. Madison faces a term of five years probation and up to a $150,000
fine. A hearing hasn't been set.
Also filed Tuesday in the New Albany Division were guilty plea agreements from Hawkins and Madison. As part of his agreement,
Hawkins will surrender his Class III wastewater treatment operator license. The agreements are currently before the court
for review.














I highly recommend Deanna and her team of professionals that serve the legal community. Great information and many thanks for sharing.
they are pushing these cases against lawyers too far. thought-crime.
vagueness cannot challenged, so let's write all laws vaguely and throw the constitution out the window.Even if the court is operating under a particular law, if they don't it they will change it to their liking. What a joke!!!
Two convictions becomes one conviction with exactly the same sentence, only it is not clear wheter or not that sentence will be 18 months, 120 months or 138 months. Actually if the guns were in a home, whether or not they were his, he is protected under the 2nd amendment. Jurors need to learn the law and the constitution before judging others. The cour5ts need to do this as well.
With all due respect, Rick, I think you probably would be making a mistake by going to law school. The job market for attorneys is so saturated, you may well find yourself unemployed and with a lot of debt. You mention law would be a good supplement to your skills. True. But employers unfortunately don't value that. You will find that a law degree may well pigeonhole you into an attorney slot and limit career options. If you have a good job now I would hold onto that. As an attorney, you may well end up making less with the aforementioned debt.