11/8 - Mental Illness #101 (Indianapolis)

Sponsored by
Back to TopPrintE-mail
Thursday  November 8, 2012 

This educational day is offered twice per year and is targeted toward law enforcement, attorneys, judges, correctional officers, probation/parole officers, and community leaders. Topics addressed during the training include Categories of Mental Illness, Biological Basis of Mental Illness, and Active Listening & Tools for Crisis Situations. Participants also will hear two In Our Own Voice presentations.


Date: Thursday, November 8, 2012 (This program is also being offered on August 16, 2012)
Time (local time): 9:00 am - 4:30 pm

Credit hours: CLE hours pending approval

Cost: $70.00
(lunch is on your own)

Location:
Larue Carter Memorial Hospital, Small Auditorium, 2601 Cold Spring Rd., Indianapolis 46222

Provider:
NAMI - National Alliance on Mental Illness/Indiana

Contact information:
Marianne Halbert
(317) 925-9399  or (800) 677-6442
mhalbert@namiindiana.org
www.namiindiana.org
and click on Mental Health & Criminal Justice Training

Back to Events
Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Indiana State Bar Association

Indianapolis Bar Association

Evansville Bar Association

Allen County Bar Association

Indiana Lawyer on Facebook

facebook
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. I need an experienced attorney to handle a breach of contract matter. Kindly respond for more details. Graham Young

  2. I thought the slurs were the least grave aspects of her misconduct, since they had nothing to do with her being on the bench. Why then do I suspect they were the focus? I find this a troubling trend. At least she was allowed to keep her law license.

  3. Section 6 of Article I of the Indiana Constitution is pretty clear and unequivocal: "Section 6. No money shall be drawn from the treasury for the benefit of any religious or theological institution."

  4. Video pen? Nice work, "JW"! Let this be a lesson and a caution to all disgruntled ex-spouses (or soon-to-be ex-spouses) . . . you may think that altercation is going to get you some satisfaction . . . it will not.

  5. First comment on this thread is a fitting final comment on this thread, as that the MCBA never answered Duncan's fine question, and now even Eric Holder agrees that the MCBA was in material error as to the facts: "I don't get it" from Duncan December 1, 2014 5:10 PM "The Grand Jury met for 25 days and heard 70 hours of testimony according to this article and they made a decision that no crime occurred. On what basis does the MCBA conclude that their decision was "unjust"? What special knowledge or evidence does the MCBA have that the Grand Jury hearing this matter was unaware of? The system that we as lawyers are sworn to uphold made a decision that there was insufficient proof that officer committed a crime. How can any of us say we know better what was right than the jury that actually heard all of the the evidence in this case."

ADVERTISEMENT