The U.S. Supreme Court, in its longest oral argument in 45 years, spent three days in March
considering multiple issues regarding the constitutionality of the politically‐charged Affordable Care
Act, also known as health care reform or Obamacare. Its decisions will be issued before the end of its
current term on June 30. Possible outcomes range from declaring the entire law unconstitutional,
keeping the law intact as is, and everything in between. This program will cover:
- A summary and analysis of majority, plurality, concurring and/or dissenting opinions
- A review of those parts of the Act already implemented
- An analysis of the impact of the Supreme Court’s decision
- Practical guidance on how states, plan sponsors and individuals will be affected and should
proceed
Speaker:
Douglas Dormire Powers, Beckman Lawson LLP
Date: Tuesday, July 31, 2012
Time:
Registration & Lunch: noon - 12:30 pm
Program: 12:30 - 2:00 pm
Credit hours: 1.5 CLE
Cost:
$60 - ACBA Members
$75 - non-ACBA Members
Location:
Allen County Bar Association, 924 South Calhoun St., Fort Wayne 46802
Provider:
Allen County Bar Association
Contact Information:
Allen County Bar Association
Phone (260) 423-2359
www.allencountybar.org
The court of appeals not only tries to rewrite or interpret the law to suit their fancy, now they choose play stupid as well. Every consideration must be given to pro se litigants, who are not held to the same standards as attorneys, as stated by,SCOTUS. I assume they didn't have a lawyer, since one wasn't mentioned and I strongly suggest thatb the rest of the, origional petitioners get back in there and fight for their rights.
the irony of situations like this is that the clients whom conour cheated are the ones who should be pulling hardest for him to remain free and keep his law license, so they have some hopes of him paying back. really bury the guy deep and then there will be little hope of restitution
Qualified immunity, means that if you wear a badge, you are exempt from law and free to do anything you please! The courts will back badge toting individuals, because they think they are above the law as well. They think, they have judicial immunity, they do not.
Deeply, deeply concerned? I'll bet if it was the judge's money that had been swindled we'd see deep concern with actual consequences. First a Ponzi scheme, then a shell game with the assets…c'mon, hasn't Conour abused the judicial system and his clients long enough? I say enough already.
Wow, just wow.