Practicing Law in Indiana: Ethics
Panel discussions on Lawyer Misconduct & Legal Malpractice
Chair & Moderator: Donald Lundberg, Barnes & Thornburg
Lawyer Misconduct panel
James Bell, Bingham Greenebaum Doll
Ronald Elberger, Bose McKinney & Evans
Donald Lundberg, Barnes & Thornburg
G. Michael Witte, Indiana Disciplinary Commission
Legal Malpractice panel
Dina Cox, Lewis Wagner, Attorneys at Law
Alice McKenzie Morical, Hoover Hull
Ronald Waicukauski, Price Waicukauski & Riley
Scott Weathers, Weathers Law Office
Date: Wednesday, October 31, 2012
Time (local time): 1:00 - 4:15 pm
(Registration begins at 12:30 pm)
Credit hours: 3.0 CLE / Ethics
Cost: Early Bird Rate if register by Oct. 17
$90 ($99 after 10/17) Attendee
$80 ($89 after 10/17) Government Employee or Paralegal
Live In-person Presentation Location:
Barnes & Thornburg Auditorium
11 S. Meridian St., Indianapolis, 46204
Live Video Seminar Location:
Barnes & Thornburg
600 One Summit Square, 110 E. Wayne Street, Fort Wayne 46802
Live Video Seminar Location:
Barnes & Thornburg
600 1st Source Bank Center, 100 North Michigan, South Bend 46601
Provider: Indiana Lawyer
Contact information:
Karen Aruta
Phone: (317) 472-5201
karuta@ibj.com
www.TheIndianaLawyer.com/events
on Facebook & Twitter
on Facebook & Twitter
Indiana Lawyer on Facebook
Back to Top
Additional Hosting & Delivery by
The court of appeals not only tries to rewrite or interpret the law to suit their fancy, now they choose play stupid as well. Every consideration must be given to pro se litigants, who are not held to the same standards as attorneys, as stated by,SCOTUS. I assume they didn't have a lawyer, since one wasn't mentioned and I strongly suggest thatb the rest of the, origional petitioners get back in there and fight for their rights.
the irony of situations like this is that the clients whom conour cheated are the ones who should be pulling hardest for him to remain free and keep his law license, so they have some hopes of him paying back. really bury the guy deep and then there will be little hope of restitution
Qualified immunity, means that if you wear a badge, you are exempt from law and free to do anything you please! The courts will back badge toting individuals, because they think they are above the law as well. They think, they have judicial immunity, they do not.
Deeply, deeply concerned? I'll bet if it was the judge's money that had been swindled we'd see deep concern with actual consequences. First a Ponzi scheme, then a shell game with the assets…c'mon, hasn't Conour abused the judicial system and his clients long enough? I say enough already.
Wow, just wow.