10/31 - Practicing Law in Indiana: Ethics (Indianapolis)

Sponsored by
Back to TopPrintE-mail
Wednesday  October 31, 2012 

Practicing Law in Indiana: Ethics
Panel discussions on Lawyer Misconduct & Legal Malpractice

Chair & Moderator: Donald Lundberg, Barnes & Thornburg

Lawyer Misconduct panel
James Bell, Bingham Greenebaum Doll
Ronald Elberger, Bose McKinney & Evans
Donald Lundberg, Barnes & Thornburg
G. Michael Witte, Indiana Disciplinary Commission

Legal Malpractice panel
Dina Cox, Lewis Wagner, Attorneys at Law
Alice McKenzie Morical, Hoover Hull
Ronald Waicukauski, Price Waicukauski & Riley
Scott Weathers, Weathers Law Office

Date: Wednesday, October 31, 2012
Time (local time): 1:00 - 4:15 pm
(Registration begins at 12:30 pm)

Credit hours: 3.0 CLE / Ethics

Cost: Early Bird Rate if register by Oct. 17
$90 ($99 after 10/17) Attendee
$80 ($89 after 10/17) Government Employee or Paralegal

Live In-person Presentation Location:
Barnes & Thornburg Auditorium
11 S. Meridian St., Indianapolis, 46204

Live Video Seminar Location:
Barnes & Thornburg
600 One Summit Square, 110 E. Wayne Street, Fort Wayne 46802

Live Video Seminar Location:
Barnes & Thornburg
600 1st Source Bank Center, 100 North Michigan, South Bend 46601

Provider: Indiana Lawyer

Contact information:
Karen Aruta
Phone: (317) 472-5201
karuta@ibj.com
www.TheIndianaLawyer.com/events
 

Back to Events
Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Indiana State Bar Association

Indianapolis Bar Association

Evansville Bar Association

Allen County Bar Association

Indiana Lawyer on Facebook

facebook
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. It appears the police and prosecutors are allowed to change the rules halfway through the game to suit themselves. I am surprised that the congress has not yet eliminated the right to a trial in cases involving any type of forensic evidence. That would suit their foolish law and order police state views. I say we eliminate the statute of limitations for crimes committed by members of congress and other government employees. Of course they would never do that. They are all corrupt cowards!!!

  2. Poor Judge Brown probably thought that by slavishly serving the godz of the age her violations of 18th century concepts like due process and the rule of law would be overlooked. Mayhaps she was merely a Judge ahead of her time?

  3. in a lawyer discipline case Judge Brown, now removed, was presiding over a hearing about a lawyer accused of the supposedly heinous ethical violation of saying the words "Illegal immigrant." (IN re Barker) http://www.in.gov/judiciary/files/order-discipline-2013-55S00-1008-DI-429.pdf .... I wonder if when we compare the egregious violations of due process by Judge Brown, to her chiding of another lawyer for politically incorrectness, if there are any conclusions to be drawn about what kind of person, what kind of judge, what kind of apparatchik, is busy implementing the agenda of political correctness and making off-limits legit advocacy about an adverse party in a suit whose illegal alien status is relevant? I am just asking the question, the reader can make own conclsuion. Oh wait-- did I use the wrong adjective-- let me rephrase that, um undocumented alien?

  4. of course the bigger questions of whether or not the people want to pay for ANY bussing is off limits, due to the Supreme Court protecting the people from DEMOCRACY. Several decades hence from desegregation and bussing plans and we STILL need to be taking all this taxpayer money to combat mostly-imagined "discrimination" in the most obviously failed social program of the postwar period.

  5. You can put your photos anywhere you like... When someone steals it they know it doesn't belong to them. And, a man getting a divorce is automatically not a nice guy...? That's ridiculous. Since when is need of money a conflict of interest? That would mean that no one should have a job unless they are already financially solvent without a job... A photographer is also under no obligation to use a watermark (again, people know when a photo doesn't belong to them) or provide contact information. Hey, he didn't make it easy for me to pay him so I'll just take it! Well heck, might as well walk out of the grocery store with a cart full of food because the lines are too long and you don't find that convenient. "Only in Indiana." Oh, now you're passing judgement on an entire state... What state do you live in? I need to characterize everyone in your state as ignorant and opinionated. And the final bit of ignorance; assuming a photo anyone would want is lucky and then how much does your camera have to cost to make it a good photo, in your obviously relevant opinion?

ADVERTISEMENT