12/20 - Federal Civil Practice Update for the Southern District of Indiana: Practical Tips from the Bench & the Bar (Indianapolis)

Sponsored by
Back to TopPrintE-mail
Thursday  December 20, 2012 


Chair & Moderator: John Maley, Barnes & Thornburg

Speakers include:
  - Hon. Richard Young, Chief Judge, Southern District of Indiana
  - Hon. Tim A. Baker, Magistrate Judge, Southern District of Indiana
  - Hon. Mark Dinsmore, Magistrate Judge, Southern District of Indiana
  - Hon. Debra McVicker Lynch, Magistrate Judge, Southern District of Indiana
  - Donld Wall, Counsel to the Circuit Executive, 7th Circuit Court of Appeals
  - Laura Briggs, Clerk, Southern District of Indiana
  - John Maley, Barnes & Thornburg

Date: Thursday, December 20, 2012
Time (local time): 1:30 - 4:45 pm
(Registration begins at 12:45 pm)
A reception follows the conclusion of the program

Credit hours: 3.0 CLE

Cost: Early Bird Rate if register by Dec. 6
$90 ($99 after 12/6) Attendee
$80 ($89 after 12/6) Government Employee or Paralegal

Location: Barnes & Thornburg Auditorium
11 S. Meridian St., Indianapolis, 46204

Provider: Indiana Lawyer

Contact information:
Karen Aruta
Phone: (317) 472-5201
karuta@ibj.com
www.TheIndianaLawyer.com/events

Back to Events
Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Indiana State Bar Association

Indianapolis Bar Association

Evansville Bar Association

Allen County Bar Association

Indiana Lawyer on Facebook

facebook
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. I need an experienced attorney to handle a breach of contract matter. Kindly respond for more details. Graham Young

  2. I thought the slurs were the least grave aspects of her misconduct, since they had nothing to do with her being on the bench. Why then do I suspect they were the focus? I find this a troubling trend. At least she was allowed to keep her law license.

  3. Section 6 of Article I of the Indiana Constitution is pretty clear and unequivocal: "Section 6. No money shall be drawn from the treasury for the benefit of any religious or theological institution."

  4. Video pen? Nice work, "JW"! Let this be a lesson and a caution to all disgruntled ex-spouses (or soon-to-be ex-spouses) . . . you may think that altercation is going to get you some satisfaction . . . it will not.

  5. First comment on this thread is a fitting final comment on this thread, as that the MCBA never answered Duncan's fine question, and now even Eric Holder agrees that the MCBA was in material error as to the facts: "I don't get it" from Duncan December 1, 2014 5:10 PM "The Grand Jury met for 25 days and heard 70 hours of testimony according to this article and they made a decision that no crime occurred. On what basis does the MCBA conclude that their decision was "unjust"? What special knowledge or evidence does the MCBA have that the Grand Jury hearing this matter was unaware of? The system that we as lawyers are sworn to uphold made a decision that there was insufficient proof that officer committed a crime. How can any of us say we know better what was right than the jury that actually heard all of the the evidence in this case."

ADVERTISEMENT