10/17-18 - Hot Topics in Indiana Law (Fort Wayne)

Sponsored by
Back to TopPrintE-mail
Wednesday  October 17, 2012  Thursday  October 18, 2012 

Topics include:
- Legislative Year in Review
- Legislative Preview
- Indiana Lake Law and Regulation Update
- Important Developments in Indiana Tort Law, Insurance Law, and Civil Litigation
- State and Federal Trust and Estate Law Update
- Criminal Law Year in Review
- Review of Ethics Decisions & Code Changes
- Bankruptcy, Commercial Law & FDCPA Update
- 2012 Family Law Update
- Amendments To Appellate Rules & Common Appellate Mistakes
- Health Care Reform: Smooth Sailing or Rough Seas Ahead?

Speakers include:
Senator Karen Tallian, Indiana State Senator, District 4
Senator David C. Long, President Pro Tempore, Indiana State Senator, District 16
Stephen R. Snyder, Snyder Morgan, LLP
David L. Farnbauch, Sweeney Law Firm
Larry L. Barnard, Cason Boxberger, LLP
Damian B. Gosheff, Faegre Baker Daniels, LLP
Nathan S.J. Williams, Shambaugh, Kast, Beck & Williams
Jeffery P. Terrill, Arnold Terrill Anzini P.C.
G. Michael Witte, Indiana Supreme Court Disciplinary Commission
Thomas P. Yoder, Barrett & McNagny, LLP
Linda P. Chrzan, Chrzan Law, LLC
Michael H. Michmerhuizen, Barrett & McNagny, LLP
Douglas Dormire Powers, Beckman Lawson, LLP

Date: Wednesday, October 17 - Thursday, October 18, 2012
Time: 8:30 am - 4:30 pm (both days)

Credit hours: 12 CLE / 1 Ethics

Cost:
2-day registration - ACBA Member/Non-member
Attorney/Judges - $400 / $450
Non-attorneys - $275 / $325

1-day registration - ACBA Member/Non-member
Attorney/Judges - $250 / $300
Non-attorneys - $175 / $200

Location:
Grand Wayne Center, 120 W. Jeffereson Blvd., Fort Wayne

Provider:
Allen County Bar Association

Contact Information:
Allen County Bar Association
Phone (260) 423-2359
www.allencountybar.org

 

Back to Events
Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. What a fine article, thank you! I can testify firsthand and by detailed legal reports (at end of this note) as to the dire consequences of rejecting this truth from the fine article above: "The inclusion and expansion of this right [to jury] in Indiana’s Constitution is a clear reflection of our state’s intention to emphasize the importance of every Hoosier’s right to make their case in front of a jury of their peers." Over $20? Every Hoosier? Well then how about when your very vocation is on the line? How about instead of a jury of peers, one faces a bevy of political appointees, mini-czars, who care less about due process of the law than the real czars did? Instead of trial by jury, trial by ideological ordeal run by Orwellian agents? Well that is built into more than a few administrative law committees of the Ind S.Ct., and it is now being weaponized, as is revealed in articles posted at this ezine, to root out post moderns heresies like refusal to stand and pledge allegiance to all things politically correct. My career was burned at the stake for not so saluting, but I think I was just one of the early logs. Due, at least in part, to the removal of the jury from bar admission and bar discipline cases, many more fires will soon be lit. Perhaps one awaits you, dear heretic? Oh, at that Ind. article 12 plank about a remedy at law for every damage done ... ah, well, the founders evidently meant only for those damages done not by the government itself, rabid statists that they were. (Yes, that was sarcasm.) My written reports available here: Denied petition for cert (this time around): http://tinyurl.com/zdmawmw Denied petition for cert (from the 2009 denial and five year banishment): http://tinyurl.com/zcypybh Related, not written by me: Amicus brief: http://tinyurl.com/hvh7qgp

  2. Justice has finally been served. So glad that Dr. Ley can finally sleep peacefully at night knowing the truth has finally come to the surface.

  3. While this right is guaranteed by our Constitution, it has in recent years been hampered by insurance companies, i.e.; the practice of the plaintiff's own insurance company intervening in an action and filing a lien against any proceeds paid to their insured. In essence, causing an additional financial hurdle for a plaintiff to overcome at trial in terms of overall award. In a very real sense an injured party in exercise of their right to trial by jury may be the only party in a cause that would end up with zero compensation.

  4. Why in the world would someone need a person to correct a transcript when a realtime court reporter could provide them with a transcript (rough draft) immediately?

  5. This article proved very enlightening. Right ahead of sitting the LSAT for the first time, I felt a sense of relief that a score of 141 was admitted to an Indiana Law School and did well under unique circumstances. While my GPA is currently 3.91 I fear standardized testing and hope that I too will get a good enough grade for acceptance here at home. Thanks so much for this informative post.

ADVERTISEMENT