10/18 - Indiana Association of Administrative Law Judges CLE (Indianapolis)
Presentations include:
- Professor and Former Justice Frank Sullivan on administrative law rulings from the Indiana Supreme Court
- Becky Brooks of JLAP and the Honorable Marianne Voorhees of the Delaware County Circuit Court regarding stress
management
- Chuck Kidd from the Disciplinary Commission on judicial independence (1 hr Ethics Credit pending)
Date: Thursday, October 18, 2012
Time (local time):
Registration: 8:30 am
Program: 9:00 am - noon
Credit hours: CLE hours pending
Cost:
$50 InAALJ members
$75 Non-Members
$100 CLE and membership in InAALJ (includes membership in National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary)
Checks should be made payable to: Indiana Association of Administrative Law Judges, Inc.
Mail to
Indiana Association of Administrative Law Judges, Inc. (InAALJ)
C/O Catherine Gibbs, President
Office of Environmental Adjudication
100 N. Senate Ave., Room N501
Indianapolis IN 46204
Location: Indiana State House - House Floor
200 W. Washington St., Indianapolis 46204
Provider: Indiana Affiliate of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary (InAALJ)
Contact information:
Catherine Gibbs, InAALJ President
(317) 232-8527
cgibbs@oea.in.gov
inaalj-cle.eventbrite.com
on Facebook & Twitter
on Facebook & Twitter
Indiana Lawyer on Facebook
Court Calendar
-
May 28, 2013 The Estate of Richard A. Mayer and Spangler, Jennings & Dougherty, P.C., v. Lax, Inc., and David Lasco - 5/28/13
-
June 12, 2013 Northern Assurance Company of America v. Thomson, Inc., et al. - 6/12/13
-
June 18, 2013 State of Indiana v. Robert Owens - 6/18/13
-
June 18, 2013 Winston K. Wood v. State of Indiana - 6/18/13
Back to Top
Additional Hosting & Delivery by
Never heard of remand to another state. How often does that happen?
I highly recommend Deanna and her team of professionals that serve the legal community. Great information and many thanks for sharing.
they are pushing these cases against lawyers too far. thought-crime.
vagueness cannot challenged, so let's write all laws vaguely and throw the constitution out the window.Even if the court is operating under a particular law, if they don't it they will change it to their liking. What a joke!!!
Two convictions becomes one conviction with exactly the same sentence, only it is not clear wheter or not that sentence will be 18 months, 120 months or 138 months. Actually if the guns were in a home, whether or not they were his, he is protected under the 2nd amendment. Jurors need to learn the law and the constitution before judging others. The cour5ts need to do this as well.