10/8 - Talk to a Lawyer Today & Amazingly Interesting CLE for Attorneys with a Heart (Indianapolis)

Sponsored by
Back to TopPrintE-mail
Monday  October 8, 2012 

This program makes pro bono service easy by preparing you to field questions from callers during “Talk to a Lawyer Today.” Work a 2-hour shift on MLK Day & we’ll waive most of the CLE cost.

Speakers:
Second Chances: Indiana’s New Laws on Sealing Criminal Records
  Larry Landis, Executive Director, Indiana Public Defender Council
  Joshua Able, Executive Director, Neighborhood Christian Legal Clinic

Social Security Disability Law
  Annette Rutkowski, Attorney at Law

Divorce Basics
  Donna Bays, Bays Family Law

Guardianship and Third Party Custody Law
  Derelle Watson-Duvall, Kids’ Voice, Inc.

Hey 19: New Emancipation Laws
  Hon. Heather Welch, Marion County Superior Court Civil Division

Witte Ways to Avoid Witte
  Hon. G. Michael Witte, Executive Secretary, Indiana Supreme Court Disciplinary Commission     

Date: Monday, October 8, 2012
Time (local time): 9:00 am - 4:30 pm

Credit: 6.0 CLE / 1 Ethics Hours

Cost:
PICK YOUR CLE PRICE:
$25 + a 2-hour shift on MLK Day
$225 + no obligation to take a shift.

Space is limited to 50 people. Preference will be given to volunteers.

Location: Barnes & Thornburg Auditorium
11 S. Meridian St., Indianapolis 46204

Provider: Indiana State Bar Assocation (ISBA)

Contact Information:
Indiana State Bar Association
Kim Latimore
(317) 639-5465 or Toll Free (800)-266-2581
sallen@inbar.org
www.inbar.org, click under "Events" for registration and additional information
 

Back to Events
Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Indiana State Bar Association

Indianapolis Bar Association

Evansville Bar Association

Allen County Bar Association

Indiana Lawyer on Facebook

facebook
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. I need an experienced attorney to handle a breach of contract matter. Kindly respond for more details. Graham Young

  2. I thought the slurs were the least grave aspects of her misconduct, since they had nothing to do with her being on the bench. Why then do I suspect they were the focus? I find this a troubling trend. At least she was allowed to keep her law license.

  3. Section 6 of Article I of the Indiana Constitution is pretty clear and unequivocal: "Section 6. No money shall be drawn from the treasury for the benefit of any religious or theological institution."

  4. Video pen? Nice work, "JW"! Let this be a lesson and a caution to all disgruntled ex-spouses (or soon-to-be ex-spouses) . . . you may think that altercation is going to get you some satisfaction . . . it will not.

  5. First comment on this thread is a fitting final comment on this thread, as that the MCBA never answered Duncan's fine question, and now even Eric Holder agrees that the MCBA was in material error as to the facts: "I don't get it" from Duncan December 1, 2014 5:10 PM "The Grand Jury met for 25 days and heard 70 hours of testimony according to this article and they made a decision that no crime occurred. On what basis does the MCBA conclude that their decision was "unjust"? What special knowledge or evidence does the MCBA have that the Grand Jury hearing this matter was unaware of? The system that we as lawyers are sworn to uphold made a decision that there was insufficient proof that officer committed a crime. How can any of us say we know better what was right than the jury that actually heard all of the the evidence in this case."

ADVERTISEMENT