11/16 - 5th Annual Court History CLE Symposium (Indianapolis)

Sponsored by
Back to TopPrintE-mail
Friday  November 16, 2012 

Speakers include:
  - Theodore R. Boehm, Retired Justice of the Indiana Supreme Court, speaking about “Gerrymandering and Election Law”
  - Doria Lynch, Historian for the U. S. District Court for the Southern District of Indiana, speaking about the 1912 Los Angeles Times bombing conspiracy case tried before Judge Albert B. Anderson in the U. S. District Court for the District of Indiana;
 - Circuit Judge John Daniel Tinder and Circuit Judge David F. Hamilton, both past judges of the U. S. District Court for the Southern District of Indiana, remarking on the differences they have observed between their experiences on the District and Circuit benches.

Date: Friday, November 16, 2012
Time (local time): 1:00 pm - 4:30 pm

Credit hours: 3.0 CLE (pending approval)

Cost:
Free for Court Historical Society Members
$50 Non-Members

RSVP by November 9 to
Denise Fort
denise.fort@faegrebd.com

Location: Birch Bayh U.S. Courthouse
46 E. Ohio St., Indianapolis 46204

Provider: Historical Society of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Indiana

Contact information:
Doria Lynch
(317) 229-3729
doria_lynch@insd.uscourts.gov
www.insd.uscourts.gov
 

Back to Events
Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Indiana State Bar Association

Indianapolis Bar Association

Evansville Bar Association

Allen County Bar Association

Indiana Lawyer on Facebook

facebook
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. Well, maybe it's because they are unelected, and, they have a tendency to strike down laws by elected officials from all over the country. When you have been taught that "Democracy" is something almost sacred, then, you will have a tendency to frown on such imperious conduct. Lawyers get acculturated in law school into thinking that this is the very essence of high minded government, but to people who are more heavily than King George ever did, they may not like it. Thanks for the information.

  2. I pd for a bankruptcy years ago with Mr Stiles and just this week received a garnishment from my pay! He never filed it even though he told me he would! Don't let this guy practice law ever again!!!

  3. Excellent initiative on the part of the AG. Thankfully someone takes action against predators taking advantage of people who have already been through the wringer. Well done!

  4. Conour will never turn these funds over to his defrauded clients. He tearfully told the court, and his daughters dutifully pledged in interviews, that his first priority is to repay every dime of the money he stole from his clients. Judge Young bought it, much to the chagrin of Conour’s victims. Why would Conour need the $2,262 anyway? Taxpayers are now supporting him, paying for his housing, utilities, food, healthcare, and clothing. If Conour puts the money anywhere but in the restitution fund, he’s proved, once again, what a con artist he continues to be and that he has never had any intention of repaying his clients. Judge Young will be proven wrong... again; Conour has no remorse and the Judge is one of the many conned.

  5. Pass Legislation to require guilty defendants to pay for the costs of lab work, etc as part of court costs...

ADVERTISEMENT