11/16 - 5th Annual Court History CLE Symposium (Indianapolis)

Sponsored by
Back to TopPrintE-mail
Friday  November 16, 2012 

Speakers include:
  - Theodore R. Boehm, Retired Justice of the Indiana Supreme Court, speaking about “Gerrymandering and Election Law”
  - Doria Lynch, Historian for the U. S. District Court for the Southern District of Indiana, speaking about the 1912 Los Angeles Times bombing conspiracy case tried before Judge Albert B. Anderson in the U. S. District Court for the District of Indiana;
 - Circuit Judge John Daniel Tinder and Circuit Judge David F. Hamilton, both past judges of the U. S. District Court for the Southern District of Indiana, remarking on the differences they have observed between their experiences on the District and Circuit benches.

Date: Friday, November 16, 2012
Time (local time): 1:00 pm - 4:30 pm

Credit hours: 3.0 CLE (pending approval)

Cost:
Free for Court Historical Society Members
$50 Non-Members

RSVP by November 9 to
Denise Fort
denise.fort@faegrebd.com

Location: Birch Bayh U.S. Courthouse
46 E. Ohio St., Indianapolis 46204

Provider: Historical Society of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Indiana

Contact information:
Doria Lynch
(317) 229-3729
doria_lynch@insd.uscourts.gov
www.insd.uscourts.gov
 

Back to Events
Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Indiana State Bar Association

Indianapolis Bar Association

Evansville Bar Association

Allen County Bar Association

Indiana Lawyer on Facebook

facebook
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. Hail to our Constitutional Law Expert in the Executive Office! “What you’re not paying attention to is the fact that I just took an action to change the law,” Obama said.

  2. What is this, the Ind Supreme Court thinking that there is a separation of powers and limited enumerated powers as delegated by a dusty old document? Such eighteen century thinking, so rare and unwanted by the elites in this modern age. Dictate to us, dictate over us, the massess are chanting! George Soros agrees. Time to change with times Ind Supreme Court, says all President Snows. Rule by executive decree is the new black.

  3. I made the same argument before a commission of the Indiana Supreme Court and then to the fedeal district and federal appellate courts. Fell flat. So very glad to read that some judges still beleive that evidentiary foundations matter.

  4. KUDOS to the Indiana Supreme Court for realizing that some bureacracies need to go to the stake. Recall what RWR said: "No government ever voluntarily reduces itself in size. Government programs, once launched, never disappear. Actually, a government bureau is the nearest thing to eternal life we'll ever see on this earth!" NOW ... what next to this rare and inspiring chopping block? Well, the Commission on Gender and Race (but not religion!?!) is way overdue. And some other Board's could be cut with a positive for State and the reputation of the Indiana judiciary.

  5. During a visit where an informant with police wears audio and video, does the video necessary have to show hand to hand transaction of money and narcotics?

ADVERTISEMENT