11/8 - Computer Technology Office Productivity & Visual Persuasion (Fort Wayne)

Sponsored by
Back to TopPrintE-mail
Thursday  November 8, 2012 

Using Computer Technology to Increase Office Productivity & Tips and Tricks from Pros on Visual Persuastion at Trial, Mediation and Arbitration
 - Mastering Email Over Load with Outlook
 - Planning for the Presentation from the Start of the Case
 - Efficient Document Creation & Editing in Word
 - Effective Exhibit List Using Excel
 - Technology Tool Chest: What Tools to Bring and How to Effectively Use Them
 - Presentation Tips and Techniques
 - Bring Power to Your Point with PowerPoint
 - Presentation Pitfalls: How to Avoid Them

Speakers:
Stephen Bour, Legal Technology Consultant, Legal Technology Columnist for Indiana Lawyer
Deanna Finney, Legal Technology Consultant, Legal Technology Columnist for Indiana Lawyer

Date: Thursday, November 8, 2012
Time (local time): 11:30 am - 2:00 pm

Credit hours: 2.0 NLS

Cost:
$85 ACBA Member Attorneys & Judges
$115 Non-ACBA Member Attorneys & Judges
$60 ACBA Member Paralegals/Legal Assistants
$75 Non-ACBA Member Paralegals/Legal Assistants

SEATING LIMITED TO 50. Reservations must be received by 4:00 p.m. Nov. 2.
Reservations received after the deadline and walk‐ins will be accepted on a space available basis with an additional $5 charge; lunch and materials may not be provided.


Location:
Allen County Bar Association, 924 South Calhoun St., Fort Wayne 46802

Provider:
Allen County Bar Association

Contact Information:
Allen County Bar Association
Phone (260) 423-2359
www.allencountybar.org

 

Back to Events
Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Indiana State Bar Association

Indianapolis Bar Association

Evansville Bar Association

Allen County Bar Association

Indiana Lawyer on Facebook

facebook
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. I need an experienced attorney to handle a breach of contract matter. Kindly respond for more details. Graham Young

  2. I thought the slurs were the least grave aspects of her misconduct, since they had nothing to do with her being on the bench. Why then do I suspect they were the focus? I find this a troubling trend. At least she was allowed to keep her law license.

  3. Section 6 of Article I of the Indiana Constitution is pretty clear and unequivocal: "Section 6. No money shall be drawn from the treasury for the benefit of any religious or theological institution."

  4. Video pen? Nice work, "JW"! Let this be a lesson and a caution to all disgruntled ex-spouses (or soon-to-be ex-spouses) . . . you may think that altercation is going to get you some satisfaction . . . it will not.

  5. First comment on this thread is a fitting final comment on this thread, as that the MCBA never answered Duncan's fine question, and now even Eric Holder agrees that the MCBA was in material error as to the facts: "I don't get it" from Duncan December 1, 2014 5:10 PM "The Grand Jury met for 25 days and heard 70 hours of testimony according to this article and they made a decision that no crime occurred. On what basis does the MCBA conclude that their decision was "unjust"? What special knowledge or evidence does the MCBA have that the Grand Jury hearing this matter was unaware of? The system that we as lawyers are sworn to uphold made a decision that there was insufficient proof that officer committed a crime. How can any of us say we know better what was right than the jury that actually heard all of the the evidence in this case."

ADVERTISEMENT