12/6 - Health Information & Ethical Representation (Indianapolis)
Health Information & Ethical Representation: Addressing Uncertainty in Regulations, Risks and Roles
The cutting edge of health information law and regulation presents an ever-evolving challenge
to the lawyer’s ability to recognize and resolve novel problems. That challenge extends not only to analyzing the maze
of statutes and regulations, but also to counsel’s approach to advocacy and risk, both within client organizations and
with regulators. Join us to address unique issues of professional responsibility in the contexts of evolving federal health
information regulation.
Date: Thursday, December 6, 2012
Time (local time): 8:30 - 11:45 am
Credit hours: 3.0 CLE / Ethics (pending)
Cost:
$50/credit
$125 for 3 credits
Discounts available
Location: JW Marriott Indianapolis
Meeting Room 209, 10 S. West Street, Indianapolis 46204
Provider: IU Maurer School of Law / CLEAR
Contact and registration information:
Craig Jackson
812-856-5621
scjackso@indiana.edu
www.clearhealthinfo.iu.edu
on Facebook & Twitter
on Facebook & Twitter
Indiana Lawyer on Facebook
Back to Top
Additional Hosting & Delivery by
the irony of situations like this is that the clients whom conour cheated are the ones who should be pulling hardest for him to remain free and keep his law license, so they have some hopes of him paying back. really bury the guy deep and then there will be little hope of restitution
Qualified immunity, means that if you wear a badge, you are exempt from law and free to do anything you please! The courts will back badge toting individuals, because they think they are above the law as well. They think, they have judicial immunity, they do not.
Deeply, deeply concerned? I'll bet if it was the judge's money that had been swindled we'd see deep concern with actual consequences. First a Ponzi scheme, then a shell game with the assets…c'mon, hasn't Conour abused the judicial system and his clients long enough? I say enough already.
Wow, just wow.
Forcing a defendant to wear a stun belt, in court or otherwise, is a violation of american principles! It is also unconstitutional!