1/3 - Talk to a Lawyer Today Prep Seminar (Fort Wayne)

Sponsored by
Back to TopPrintE-mail
Thursday  January 3, 2013 

VIDEO REPLAY

11th Annual "Talk to A Lawyer Today" Prep Seminar: Amazingly Interesting CLEfor Attorneys with a Heart

The Indiana State Bar Association “Talk to a Lawyer Today” program is designed as a legal information clinic, which will be held statewide on Monday, January 21, 2013. Participating lawyers are asked to donate two hours to speak with the general public about legal issues. The local walk-in program will be held at the downtown Allen County Public Library; attorneys are also needed to take telephone calls at the Volunteer Lawyer Program office.

Date: Thursday, January 3, 2013
Time:
Registration: 8:45 am
Program: 9:00 am
(lunch on your own)

Credit hours: 6.0 CLE / 1.0 Ethics

Cost:
$40 - if participate in Talk to a Lawyer
$245 - attend CLE program only

Location:
Allen County Bar Association, 924 South Calhoun St., Fort Wayne 46802

Provider:
Allen County Bar Association

Contact Information:
Allen County Bar Association
Phone (260) 423-2359
www.allencountybar.org

 

Back to Events
Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Indiana State Bar Association

Indianapolis Bar Association

Evansville Bar Association

Allen County Bar Association

Indiana Lawyer on Facebook

facebook
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. I need an experienced attorney to handle a breach of contract matter. Kindly respond for more details. Graham Young

  2. I thought the slurs were the least grave aspects of her misconduct, since they had nothing to do with her being on the bench. Why then do I suspect they were the focus? I find this a troubling trend. At least she was allowed to keep her law license.

  3. Section 6 of Article I of the Indiana Constitution is pretty clear and unequivocal: "Section 6. No money shall be drawn from the treasury for the benefit of any religious or theological institution."

  4. Video pen? Nice work, "JW"! Let this be a lesson and a caution to all disgruntled ex-spouses (or soon-to-be ex-spouses) . . . you may think that altercation is going to get you some satisfaction . . . it will not.

  5. First comment on this thread is a fitting final comment on this thread, as that the MCBA never answered Duncan's fine question, and now even Eric Holder agrees that the MCBA was in material error as to the facts: "I don't get it" from Duncan December 1, 2014 5:10 PM "The Grand Jury met for 25 days and heard 70 hours of testimony according to this article and they made a decision that no crime occurred. On what basis does the MCBA conclude that their decision was "unjust"? What special knowledge or evidence does the MCBA have that the Grand Jury hearing this matter was unaware of? The system that we as lawyers are sworn to uphold made a decision that there was insufficient proof that officer committed a crime. How can any of us say we know better what was right than the jury that actually heard all of the the evidence in this case."

ADVERTISEMENT