12/18 - When Broker ... Means "Broker" (Indianapolis)

Sponsored by
Back to TopPrintE-mail
Tuesday  December 18, 2012 

Speaker:
  Mark E. Maddox, former Indiana Securities Commissioner and founder of Maddox Hargett & Caruso, P.C., illustrates the world of investment fraud using real-life cases. A nationally recognized legal expert in securities arbitration, he shows investors how to spot red flags of potentially “bad” investments. He will expose a number of current fraud schemes (many geared to the elderly) and teach you how best to avoid them.

Program:
   Investment fraud and stockbroker misconduct can happen to anyone who has money to invest. Sometimes fraud is committed by a negligent stockbroker or financial advisor who knowingly or unintentionally misrepresents certain investments. Other times, it’s a greedy spouse who makes unauthorized transactions in their spouse’s brokerage account. Learn how to protect yourself and your clients. This program will be of interest to attorneys practicing Probate Law, Elder Law and Family Law.

Date: Tuesday, December 18, 2012
Time (local time): 8:00 - 9:00 am

Credit: 1.0 CLE Hours

Cost:
$35  ISBA members
$50  Non-ISBA members

Click here for registration information

Location: Regions Conference Center
One Indiana Square, 5th Floor, Indianapolis 46204

Provider: Indiana State Bar Assocation (ISBA)

Contact Information:
Indiana State Bar Association
(317) 639-5465 or Toll Free (800) 266-2581
sallen@inbar.org
www.inbar.org, click under events for registration and additional information
 

Back to Events
Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Indiana State Bar Association

Indianapolis Bar Association

Evansville Bar Association

Allen County Bar Association

Indiana Lawyer on Facebook

facebook
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. I need an experienced attorney to handle a breach of contract matter. Kindly respond for more details. Graham Young

  2. I thought the slurs were the least grave aspects of her misconduct, since they had nothing to do with her being on the bench. Why then do I suspect they were the focus? I find this a troubling trend. At least she was allowed to keep her law license.

  3. Section 6 of Article I of the Indiana Constitution is pretty clear and unequivocal: "Section 6. No money shall be drawn from the treasury for the benefit of any religious or theological institution."

  4. Video pen? Nice work, "JW"! Let this be a lesson and a caution to all disgruntled ex-spouses (or soon-to-be ex-spouses) . . . you may think that altercation is going to get you some satisfaction . . . it will not.

  5. First comment on this thread is a fitting final comment on this thread, as that the MCBA never answered Duncan's fine question, and now even Eric Holder agrees that the MCBA was in material error as to the facts: "I don't get it" from Duncan December 1, 2014 5:10 PM "The Grand Jury met for 25 days and heard 70 hours of testimony according to this article and they made a decision that no crime occurred. On what basis does the MCBA conclude that their decision was "unjust"? What special knowledge or evidence does the MCBA have that the Grand Jury hearing this matter was unaware of? The system that we as lawyers are sworn to uphold made a decision that there was insufficient proof that officer committed a crime. How can any of us say we know better what was right than the jury that actually heard all of the the evidence in this case."

ADVERTISEMENT