5/30 - Latest Developments in the Circuit Court Criminal Calendar (Fort Wayne)

Sponsored by
Back to TopPrintE-mail
Thursday  May 30, 2013 
5:00 PM  EST

Allen Circuit Problem Solving Court for OWI Offenders: The Restoration Court
  - What is a Problem Solving Court?
  - Who is eligible to participate in this program?
  - How much does it cost?
  - Can an individual work while on the program?
  - How long is the program & what are its requirements/components?
  - Are there incentives upon successful completion?

The ACCC/Kelley House Modified Therapeutic Community
  - What is a Modified Therapeutic Community?
  - Who is eligible to participate in this program?
  - How much does it cost?
  - Can an individual work while on the program?
  - How long is the program & what are its requirements/components?
  - Are there incentives upon successful completion?

Transition from AADP to Probation in Circuit Court for OWI Offenders - HOPE Program

  Hon. Thomas Felts, Allen Circuit Court
  Mag. Craig Bobay, Allen Circuit Court
  Hearing Officer John Kitch III, Allen Circuit Court

Date: Thursday, May 30, 2013
Time: 5:30 - 6:30 pm
5:15 - 5:30 pm Registration & light dinner
5:30 - 6:30 pm Program

Credit hours: 1.0 CLE

$40 - Criminal Defense Section Members
$45 - ACBA Members (Non‐Section Members)
$60 - Non‐ACBA Members

Reservations must be received by 4:00 p.m. Friday, May 24, 2013.
Reservations received after the deadline and walk‐ins will be accepted on a space available basis with an additional $5 charge; me a l and materials may not be provided.

Allen County Bar Association, 924 South Calhoun St., Fort Wayne 46802

Allen County Bar Association

Contact Information:
Allen County Bar Association
Phone (260) 423-2359


Back to Events
Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Indiana State Bar Association

Indianapolis Bar Association

Evansville Bar Association

Allen County Bar Association

Indiana Lawyer on Facebook

Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. It appears the police and prosecutors are allowed to change the rules halfway through the game to suit themselves. I am surprised that the congress has not yet eliminated the right to a trial in cases involving any type of forensic evidence. That would suit their foolish law and order police state views. I say we eliminate the statute of limitations for crimes committed by members of congress and other government employees. Of course they would never do that. They are all corrupt cowards!!!

  2. Poor Judge Brown probably thought that by slavishly serving the godz of the age her violations of 18th century concepts like due process and the rule of law would be overlooked. Mayhaps she was merely a Judge ahead of her time?

  3. in a lawyer discipline case Judge Brown, now removed, was presiding over a hearing about a lawyer accused of the supposedly heinous ethical violation of saying the words "Illegal immigrant." (IN re Barker) http://www.in.gov/judiciary/files/order-discipline-2013-55S00-1008-DI-429.pdf .... I wonder if when we compare the egregious violations of due process by Judge Brown, to her chiding of another lawyer for politically incorrectness, if there are any conclusions to be drawn about what kind of person, what kind of judge, what kind of apparatchik, is busy implementing the agenda of political correctness and making off-limits legit advocacy about an adverse party in a suit whose illegal alien status is relevant? I am just asking the question, the reader can make own conclsuion. Oh wait-- did I use the wrong adjective-- let me rephrase that, um undocumented alien?

  4. of course the bigger questions of whether or not the people want to pay for ANY bussing is off limits, due to the Supreme Court protecting the people from DEMOCRACY. Several decades hence from desegregation and bussing plans and we STILL need to be taking all this taxpayer money to combat mostly-imagined "discrimination" in the most obviously failed social program of the postwar period.

  5. You can put your photos anywhere you like... When someone steals it they know it doesn't belong to them. And, a man getting a divorce is automatically not a nice guy...? That's ridiculous. Since when is need of money a conflict of interest? That would mean that no one should have a job unless they are already financially solvent without a job... A photographer is also under no obligation to use a watermark (again, people know when a photo doesn't belong to them) or provide contact information. Hey, he didn't make it easy for me to pay him so I'll just take it! Well heck, might as well walk out of the grocery store with a cart full of food because the lines are too long and you don't find that convenient. "Only in Indiana." Oh, now you're passing judgement on an entire state... What state do you live in? I need to characterize everyone in your state as ignorant and opinionated. And the final bit of ignorance; assuming a photo anyone would want is lucky and then how much does your camera have to cost to make it a good photo, in your obviously relevant opinion?