2/8 - Allen County Bench/Bar Conference 2013 (Fort Wayne)

Sponsored by
Back to TopPrintE-mail
Friday  February 8, 2013 

Sessions include:
- Bankruptcy 101-View of Debtor
- Immigration & Employment Law
- Ethics Vignettes
- Bankruptcy-Creditors Rights
- Federal Court Practice Update
- Hot Topics in Criminal Law
- Technology
- Probate/Estate/Guardianship
- Statutory Revisions: Emancipation
- Elder Law
- Family Law & Social Security
- Judges Panel: Civil Litigation

Go to allencountybar.org for complete schedule of topics and speakers

Date: Friday, February 8, 2013
Time: 8:15 am - 4:30 pm

Credit hours: 6.0 CLE / 2.0 Ethics

Cost:
All Day
Attorneys/Judges
$300 ACBA members
$350 non-members

Half Day
Attorneys/Judges
$175 ACBA members
$200 non-members

Location: Grand Wayne Center
120 W. Jefferson Blvd., Fort Wayne 46802

Provider:
Allen County Bar Association

Contact Information:
Allen County Bar Association
Phone (260) 423-2359
www.allencountybar.org

 

Back to Events
Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Indiana State Bar Association

Indianapolis Bar Association

Evansville Bar Association

Allen County Bar Association

Indiana Lawyer on Facebook

facebook
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. I need an experienced attorney to handle a breach of contract matter. Kindly respond for more details. Graham Young

  2. I thought the slurs were the least grave aspects of her misconduct, since they had nothing to do with her being on the bench. Why then do I suspect they were the focus? I find this a troubling trend. At least she was allowed to keep her law license.

  3. Section 6 of Article I of the Indiana Constitution is pretty clear and unequivocal: "Section 6. No money shall be drawn from the treasury for the benefit of any religious or theological institution."

  4. Video pen? Nice work, "JW"! Let this be a lesson and a caution to all disgruntled ex-spouses (or soon-to-be ex-spouses) . . . you may think that altercation is going to get you some satisfaction . . . it will not.

  5. First comment on this thread is a fitting final comment on this thread, as that the MCBA never answered Duncan's fine question, and now even Eric Holder agrees that the MCBA was in material error as to the facts: "I don't get it" from Duncan December 1, 2014 5:10 PM "The Grand Jury met for 25 days and heard 70 hours of testimony according to this article and they made a decision that no crime occurred. On what basis does the MCBA conclude that their decision was "unjust"? What special knowledge or evidence does the MCBA have that the Grand Jury hearing this matter was unaware of? The system that we as lawyers are sworn to uphold made a decision that there was insufficient proof that officer committed a crime. How can any of us say we know better what was right than the jury that actually heard all of the the evidence in this case."

ADVERTISEMENT