2/13 - Indiana Parenting Time Guidelines: 2013 Upgrades & Applications (Fort Wayne)

Sponsored by
Back to TopPrintE-mail
Wednesday  February 13, 2013 

Magistrate Craig Bobay will discuss the revisions to the Guidelines that are
effective 3/1/13

Dr. Susan Dwyer and John Brandt will discuss trouble shooting under the IPTG ‐ a psychological perspective.
  - Child refusing to go with parent
  - Overnight parenting time for infants
  - Extracurricular activities vs. parenting

Speakers:
  Magistrate Craig J. Bobay, Allen County Circuit Court
  John H. Brandt, Beckman Lawson, LLP
  Susan A. Dwyer, PH.D., HSPP Clinical & Forensic Psychologist ‐ Psychological Service Associates

Date: Wednesday, February 13, 2013
Time:
Registration: 1:45 - 2:00 pm
Program: 2:00 - 5:15 pm

Credit hours: 3.0 CLE

Cost:
$125 - ACBA members
$170 - non-ACBA members

Reservations must be received by 4:00 p.m. Friday, February 8, 2013.
Reservations received after the deadline and walk‐ins will be accepted on a space available basis
with an additional $5 charge, materials may not be provided.

Location:
Allen County Public Library, Rooms B & C ‐ 900 Library Plaza, Fort Wayne, 46802
Underground and surface parking are available at the Library

Provider:
Allen County Bar Association

Contact Information:
Allen County Bar Association
Phone (260) 423-2359
www.allencountybar.org

 

Back to Events
Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Indiana State Bar Association

Indianapolis Bar Association

Evansville Bar Association

Allen County Bar Association

Indiana Lawyer on Facebook

facebook
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. I wonder if the USSR had electronic voting machines that changed the ballot after it was cast? Oh well, at least we have a free media serving as vicious watchdog and exposing all of the rot in the system! (Insert rimshot)

  2. Jose, you are assuming those in power do not wish to be totalitarian. My experience has convinced me otherwise. Constitutionalists are nearly as rare as hens teeth among the powerbrokers "managing" us for The Glorious State. Oh, and your point is dead on, el correcta mundo. Keep the Founders’ (1791 & 1851) vision alive, my friend, even if most all others, and especially the ruling junta, chase only power and money (i.e. mammon)

  3. Hypocrisy in high places, absolute immunity handed out like Halloween treats (it is the stuff of which tyranny is made) and the belief that government agents are above the constitutions and cannot be held responsible for mere citizen is killing, perhaps has killed, The Republic. And yet those same power drunk statists just reel on down the hallway toward bureaucratic fascism.

  4. Well, I agree with you that the people need to wake up and see what our judges and politicians have done to our rights and freedoms. This DNA loophole in the statute of limitations is clearly unconstitutional. Why should dna evidence be treated different than video tape evidence for example. So if you commit a crime and they catch you on tape or if you confess or leave prints behind: they only have five years to bring their case. However, if dna identifies someone they can still bring a case even fifty-years later. where is the common sense and reason. Members of congress are corrupt fools. They should all be kicked out of office and replaced by people who respect the constitution.

  5. If the AG could pick and choose which state statutes he defended from Constitutional challenge, wouldn't that make him more powerful than the Guv and General Assembly? In other words, the AG should have no choice in defending laws. He should defend all of them. If its a bad law, blame the General Assembly who presumably passed it with a majority (not the government lawyer). Also, why has there been no write up on the actual legislators who passed the law defining marriage? For all the fuss Democrats have made, it would be interesting to know if some Democrats voted in favor of it (or if some Republican's voted against it). Have a nice day.

ADVERTISEMENT