2/26 - Transition to Practice: Ethical Client Development (Indianapolis)

Sponsored by
Back to TopPrintE-mail
Tuesday  February 26, 2013 

The Professional Code of Conduct dictates much of what you can and can’t do to attract clients to your practice. Learn techniques for finding and developing your client base that keep you in good standing with the Professional Code of Conduct, where to find ethical networking opportunities and how to make the most of them.
The Transition to Practice Series is designed to provide practical no-nonsense guidance for law students and new attorneys on how to practice law. Experienced practitioners will lead these presentations on essentials every new lawyer needs to know.

Speakers:
  - Derrick Wilson, New Albany
  - Andrea Ciobanu, Indianapolis
  - Marc Matheny, Indianapolis

Date: Tuesday, February 26, 2013
Time (local time): 4:30 - 5:30 pm

Credit: 1.0 CLE/Ethics Hours

Cost:
$10 Attorneys in practice less than 3 years
$20 Attorneys in practice more than 3 years

Location: IU McKinney School of Law
Room 245, 530 W. New York St., Indianapolis 46202

Provider: Indiana State Bar Assocation (ISBA)

Contact Information:
Indiana State Bar Association
(317) 639-5465 or Toll Free (800)-266-2581
sallen@inbar.org
www.inbar.org, click under events for registration and additional information
Click here for registration brochure

Back to Events
Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. The practitioners and judges who hail E-filing as the Saviour of the West need to contain their respective excitements. E-filing is federal court requires the practitioner to cram his motion practice into pigeonholes created by IT people. Compound motions or those seeking alternative relief are effectively barred, unless the practitioner wants to receive a tart note from some functionary admonishing about the "problem". E-filing is just another method by which courts and judges transfer their burden to practitioners, who are the really the only powerless components of the system. Of COURSE it is easier for the court to require all of its imput to conform to certain formats, but this imposition does NOT improve the quality of the practice of law and does NOT improve the ability of the practitioner to advocate for his client or to fashion pleadings that exactly conform to his client's best interests. And we should be very wary of the disingenuous pablum about the costs. The courts will find a way to stick it to the practitioner. Lake County is a VERY good example of this rapaciousness. Any one who does not believe this is invited to review the various special fees that system imposes upon practitioners- as practitioners- and upon each case ON TOP of the court costs normal in every case manually filed. Jurisprudence according to Aldous Huxley.

  2. Any attorneys who practice in federal court should be able to say the same as I can ... efiling is great. I have been doing it in fed court since it started way back. Pacer has its drawbacks, but the ability to hit an e-docket and pull up anything and everything onscreen is a huge plus for a litigator, eps the sole practitioner, who lacks a filing clerk and the paralegal support of large firms. Were I an Indiana attorney I would welcome this great step forward.

  3. Can we get full disclosure on lobbyist's payments to legislatures such as Mr Buck? AS long as there are idiots that are disrespectful of neighbors and intent on shooting fireworks every night, some kind of regulations are needed.

  4. I am the mother of the child in this case. My silence on the matter was due to the fact that I filed, both in Illinois and Indiana, child support cases. I even filed supporting documentation with the Indiana family law court. Not sure whether this information was provided to the court of appeals or not. Wish the case was done before moving to Indiana, because no matter what, there is NO WAY the state of Illinois would have allowed an appeal on a child support case!

  5. "No one is safe when the Legislature is in session."

ADVERTISEMENT