4/2 - Transition to Practice: Engaging Your Clients (Indianapolis)

Sponsored by
Back to TopPrintE-mail
Tuesday  April 2, 2013 

This session will inform you of the reasons you need to have an engagement letter and advise you of best practices regarding when and how to execute the letter and what to include in it. Presenters will identify aspects of the engagement letter that address the duties, such as competence and loyalty, that a lawyer owes a client under the Rules of Professional Conduct, and ways those duties can also be addressed in the letter.

The Transition to Practice Series is designed to provide practical no-nonsense guidance for law students and new attorneys on how to practice law. Experienced practitioners will lead these presentations on essentials every new lawyer needs to know.

Speakers:
  - James W. Riley Jr., Indianapolis
  - Stephanie Chaudhary, Indianapolis

Date: Tuesday, April 2, 2013
Time (local time): 12:45 - 1:45 pm

Credit: 1.0 CLE/Ethics Hours

Cost:
$10 Attorneys in practice less than 3 years
$20 Attorneys in practice more than 3 years

Location: IU McKinney School of Law
Room 245, 530 W. New York St., Indianapolis 46202

Provider: Indiana State Bar Assocation (ISBA)

Contact Information:
Indiana State Bar Association
(317) 639-5465 or Toll Free (800)-266-2581
sallen@inbar.org
www.inbar.org, click under events for registration and additional information
Click here for registration brochure

Back to Events
Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Indiana State Bar Association

Indianapolis Bar Association

Evansville Bar Association

Allen County Bar Association

Indiana Lawyer on Facebook

facebook
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. What is this, the Ind Supreme Court thinking that there is a separation of powers and limited enumerated powers as delegated by a dusty old document? Such eighteen century thinking, so rare and unwanted by the elites in this modern age. Dictate to us, dictate over us, the massess are chanting! George Soros agrees. Time to change with times Ind Supreme Court, says all President Snows. Rule by executive decree is the new black.

  2. I made the same argument before a commission of the Indiana Supreme Court and then to the fedeal district and federal appellate courts. Fell flat. So very glad to read that some judges still beleive that evidentiary foundations matter.

  3. KUDOS to the Indiana Supreme Court for realizing that some bureacracies need to go to the stake. Recall what RWR said: "No government ever voluntarily reduces itself in size. Government programs, once launched, never disappear. Actually, a government bureau is the nearest thing to eternal life we'll ever see on this earth!" NOW ... what next to this rare and inspiring chopping block? Well, the Commission on Gender and Race (but not religion!?!) is way overdue. And some other Board's could be cut with a positive for State and the reputation of the Indiana judiciary.

  4. During a visit where an informant with police wears audio and video, does the video necessary have to show hand to hand transaction of money and narcotics?

  5. I will agree with that as soon as law schools stop lying to prospective students about salaries and employment opportunities in the legal profession. There is no defense to the fraudulent numbers first year salaries they post to mislead people into going to law school.

ADVERTISEMENT