4/23 - Timeless Tips from the Bench and Bar (Indianapolis)

Sponsored by
Back to TopPrintE-mail
Tuesday  April 23, 2013 

AGENDA
8:30 am Registration & Refreshments
8:55 Welcome & course introduction - Curtis E. Shirley
9:00 Tips on how technologycan change our profession - Hon. Randall T. Shepard
9:20 Tips on the summary judgment process - Hon. Terry A. Crone
9:40 Tips on direct and cross examination - Hon. Michael P. Barnes and Hon. Nancy H. Vaidik

10:20 am Break

10:40 Tips on better writing - Hon. Tanya Walton Pratt
11:00 Tips on better motions & briefs in the trial court and on appeal - Hon. James Kirsch, Hon. Paul D. Mathias, and Hon. Edward W. Najam, Jr.

12:00 pm Break

12:20 – 1:00 Lunch Guest speaker - Dean William F. Harvey

1:10 Tips on how to distinguish unfavorable precedent - Hon. Frank Sullivan, Jr.
1:30 Tips on oral argument - Hon. Cale Bradford
1:50 Tips on petitions to transfer - Hon. Theodore R. Boehm
2:10 Tips on mediation and settlement - Samuel R. “Chic” Born, II

2:30 pm Break

2:50 Tips on what judges wish from lawyers - Hon. Patricia Riley
3:10 Tips on what lawyers wish from judges - Thomas L. Davis
3:30 Tips on what the commission wants from all - G. Michael Witte
3:50 Tips on what the public (media) should hear - James H. Voyles, Jr.
4:10 pm Adjourn

Date: Tuesday, April 23, 2013
Time (local time): 
Registration: 8:30 - 9:00 am
Program: 9:00 am - 4:10 pm (includes lunch)

Credit hours: 6.0 CLE/1.0 Ethics

Cost: $300
A significant portion of your registration fee supports the work of Indianapolis Legal Aid Society.

Click here for registration form.

Location: Indianapolis Marriott North
3645 River Crossing Pkwy, Indianapolis 46240

Provider:
Indianapolis Legal Aid Society

Contact information:
Curtis Shirley
(317) 685-6512
curtis@shirleylaw.net

For more information go to shirleylaw.net.
 

Back to Events
Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Indiana State Bar Association

Indianapolis Bar Association

Evansville Bar Association

Allen County Bar Association

Indiana Lawyer on Facebook

facebook
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. Such things are no more elections than those in the late, unlamented Soviet Union.

  2. It appears the police and prosecutors are allowed to change the rules halfway through the game to suit themselves. I am surprised that the congress has not yet eliminated the right to a trial in cases involving any type of forensic evidence. That would suit their foolish law and order police state views. I say we eliminate the statute of limitations for crimes committed by members of congress and other government employees. Of course they would never do that. They are all corrupt cowards!!!

  3. Poor Judge Brown probably thought that by slavishly serving the godz of the age her violations of 18th century concepts like due process and the rule of law would be overlooked. Mayhaps she was merely a Judge ahead of her time?

  4. in a lawyer discipline case Judge Brown, now removed, was presiding over a hearing about a lawyer accused of the supposedly heinous ethical violation of saying the words "Illegal immigrant." (IN re Barker) http://www.in.gov/judiciary/files/order-discipline-2013-55S00-1008-DI-429.pdf .... I wonder if when we compare the egregious violations of due process by Judge Brown, to her chiding of another lawyer for politically incorrectness, if there are any conclusions to be drawn about what kind of person, what kind of judge, what kind of apparatchik, is busy implementing the agenda of political correctness and making off-limits legit advocacy about an adverse party in a suit whose illegal alien status is relevant? I am just asking the question, the reader can make own conclsuion. Oh wait-- did I use the wrong adjective-- let me rephrase that, um undocumented alien?

  5. of course the bigger questions of whether or not the people want to pay for ANY bussing is off limits, due to the Supreme Court protecting the people from DEMOCRACY. Several decades hence from desegregation and bussing plans and we STILL need to be taking all this taxpayer money to combat mostly-imagined "discrimination" in the most obviously failed social program of the postwar period.

ADVERTISEMENT