4/23 - Timeless Tips from the Bench and Bar (Indianapolis)

Sponsored by
Back to TopPrintE-mail
Tuesday  April 23, 2013 

AGENDA
8:30 am Registration & Refreshments
8:55 Welcome & course introduction - Curtis E. Shirley
9:00 Tips on how technologycan change our profession - Hon. Randall T. Shepard
9:20 Tips on the summary judgment process - Hon. Terry A. Crone
9:40 Tips on direct and cross examination - Hon. Michael P. Barnes and Hon. Nancy H. Vaidik

10:20 am Break

10:40 Tips on better writing - Hon. Tanya Walton Pratt
11:00 Tips on better motions & briefs in the trial court and on appeal - Hon. James Kirsch, Hon. Paul D. Mathias, and Hon. Edward W. Najam, Jr.

12:00 pm Break

12:20 – 1:00 Lunch Guest speaker - Dean William F. Harvey

1:10 Tips on how to distinguish unfavorable precedent - Hon. Frank Sullivan, Jr.
1:30 Tips on oral argument - Hon. Cale Bradford
1:50 Tips on petitions to transfer - Hon. Theodore R. Boehm
2:10 Tips on mediation and settlement - Samuel R. “Chic” Born, II

2:30 pm Break

2:50 Tips on what judges wish from lawyers - Hon. Patricia Riley
3:10 Tips on what lawyers wish from judges - Thomas L. Davis
3:30 Tips on what the commission wants from all - G. Michael Witte
3:50 Tips on what the public (media) should hear - James H. Voyles, Jr.
4:10 pm Adjourn

Date: Tuesday, April 23, 2013
Time (local time): 
Registration: 8:30 - 9:00 am
Program: 9:00 am - 4:10 pm (includes lunch)

Credit hours: 6.0 CLE/1.0 Ethics

Cost: $300
A significant portion of your registration fee supports the work of Indianapolis Legal Aid Society.

Click here for registration form.

Location: Indianapolis Marriott North
3645 River Crossing Pkwy, Indianapolis 46240

Provider:
Indianapolis Legal Aid Society

Contact information:
Curtis Shirley
(317) 685-6512
curtis@shirleylaw.net

For more information go to shirleylaw.net.
 

Back to Events
Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. Just an aside, but regardless of the outcome, I 'm proud of Judge William Hughes. He was the original magistrate on the Home place issue. He ruled for Home Place, and was primaried by Brainard for it. Their tool Poindexter failed to unseat Hughes, who won support for his honesty and courage throughout the county, and he was reelected Judge of Hamilton County's Superior Court. You can still stand for something and survive. Thanks, Judge Hughes!

  2. CCHP's real accomplishment is the 2015 law signed by Gov Pence that basically outlaws any annexation that is forced where a 65% majority of landowners in the affected area disagree. Regardless of whether HP wins or loses, the citizens of Indiana will not have another fiasco like this. The law Gov Pence signed is a direct result of this malgovernance.

  3. I gave tempparry guardship to a friend of my granddaughter in 2012. I went to prison. I had custody. My daughter went to prison to. We are out. My daughter gave me custody but can get her back. She was not order to give me custody . but now we want granddaughter back from friend. She's 14 now. What rights do we have

  4. This sure is not what most who value good governance consider the Rule of Law to entail: "In a letter dated March 2, which Brizzi forwarded to IBJ, the commission dismissed the grievance “on grounds that there is not reasonable cause to believe that you are guilty of misconduct.”" Yet two month later reasonable cause does exist? (Or is the commission forging ahead, the need for reasonable belief be damned? -- A seeming violation of the Rules of Profession Ethics on the part of the commission) Could the rule of law theory cause one to believe that an explanation is in order? Could it be that Hoosier attorneys live under Imperial Law (which is also a t-word that rhymes with infamy) in which the Platonic guardians can do no wrong and never owe the plebeian class any explanation for their powerful actions. (Might makes it right?) Could this be a case of politics directing the commission, as celebrated IU Mauer Professor (the late) Patrick Baude warned was happening 20 years ago in his controversial (whisteblowing) ethics lecture on a quite similar topic: http://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1498&context=ilj

  5. I have a case presently pending cert review before the SCOTUS that reveals just how Indiana regulates the bar. I have been denied licensure for life for holding the wrong views and questioning the grand inquisitors as to their duties as to state and federal constitutional due process. True story: https://www.scribd.com/doc/299040839/2016Petitionforcert-to-SCOTUS Shorter, Amici brief serving to frame issue as misuse of govt licensure: https://www.scribd.com/doc/312841269/Thomas-More-Society-Amicus-Brown-v-Ind-Bd-of-Law-Examiners

ADVERTISEMENT