4/24 - Modern Lawyering Utilizing Social Media (Indianapolis)

Sponsored by
Back to TopPrintE-mail
Wednesday  April 24, 2013 

Program:
Social Media: First Amendment Implications and the Employment Context
      Moderator: Andrea Ciobanu, Ciobanu Law, PC
      Panelists:
      Kenneth J. Falk, Legal Director, ACLU of Indiana
      Linda Calvin, former Social Media Manager for Dow
      Jessica Tucker Ballard, Clerk, Indiana Court of Appeals

Utilizing Social Media Ethically
      Moderator: The Hon. James S. Kirsch, Indiana Court of Appeals
      Panelists: 
      Hon. Paul D. Mathias, Indiana Court of Appeals
      Hon. Melissa S. May, Indiana Court of Appeals
      G. Michael Witte, Indiana Disciplinary Commission
      Jaime Lira, Marketing Manager, Cohen & Malad

Litigation and Discovery: How to get Social Media Evidence in and Keep it in
      Moderator:  Jimmie McMillian, Barnes & Thornburg, LLP
      Panelists: 
      Hon. Tanya Walton Pratt, Southern District of Indiana
      Hon. David Shaheed, Marion County Superior Court
      Hon. David Hooper, Commissioner, Marion County Superior Court

Date: Wednesday, April 24, 2013
Time (local time): 2:00 - 5:00 pm
Reception follows program

Credit hours: 3.0 CLE /  2.0 Ethics (pending)

Cost:
$50 MCBA members
$90 non-MCBA members

Go to mcbasocialmediacle.eventbrite.com to register online.

Location: Barnes & Thornburg Auditorium
11 S. Meridian St., Indianapolis 46204

Provider: Marion County Bar Association

Contact information:
Andrea Ciobanu
(317) 495-1090
aciobanu@ciobanulaw.com
www.mcbaindy.org
 

Back to Events
Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. Contact Lea Shelemey attorney in porter county Indiana. She just helped us win our case...she is awesome...

  2. We won!!!! It was a long expensive battle but we did it. I just wanted people to know it is possible. And if someone can point me I. The right direction to help change the way the courts look as grandparents as only grandparents. The courts assume the parent does what is in the best interest of the child...and the court is wrong. A lot of the time it is spite and vindictiveness that separates grandparents and grandchildren. It should not have been this long and hard and expensive...Something needs to change...

  3. Typo on # of Indiana counties

  4. The Supreme Court is very proud that they are Giving a billion dollar public company from Texas who owns Odyssey a statewide monopoly which consultants have said is not unnecessary but worse they have already cost Hoosiers well over $100 MILLION, costing tens of millions every year and Odyssey is still not connected statewide which is in violation of state law. The Supreme Court is using taxpayer money and Odyssey to compete against a Hoosier company who has the only system in Indiana that is connected statewide and still has 40 of the 82 counties despite the massive spending and unnecessary attacks

  5. Here's a recent resource regarding steps that should be taken for removal from the IN sex offender registry. I haven't found anything as comprehensive as of yet. Hopefully this is helpful - http://www.chjrlaw.com/removal-indiana-sex-offender-registry/

ADVERTISEMENT