4/24 - Modern Lawyering Utilizing Social Media (Indianapolis)

Sponsored by
Back to TopPrintE-mail
Wednesday  April 24, 2013 

Program:
Social Media: First Amendment Implications and the Employment Context
      Moderator: Andrea Ciobanu, Ciobanu Law, PC
      Panelists:
      Kenneth J. Falk, Legal Director, ACLU of Indiana
      Linda Calvin, former Social Media Manager for Dow
      Jessica Tucker Ballard, Clerk, Indiana Court of Appeals

Utilizing Social Media Ethically
      Moderator: The Hon. James S. Kirsch, Indiana Court of Appeals
      Panelists: 
      Hon. Paul D. Mathias, Indiana Court of Appeals
      Hon. Melissa S. May, Indiana Court of Appeals
      G. Michael Witte, Indiana Disciplinary Commission
      Jaime Lira, Marketing Manager, Cohen & Malad

Litigation and Discovery: How to get Social Media Evidence in and Keep it in
      Moderator:  Jimmie McMillian, Barnes & Thornburg, LLP
      Panelists: 
      Hon. Tanya Walton Pratt, Southern District of Indiana
      Hon. David Shaheed, Marion County Superior Court
      Hon. David Hooper, Commissioner, Marion County Superior Court

Date: Wednesday, April 24, 2013
Time (local time): 2:00 - 5:00 pm
Reception follows program

Credit hours: 3.0 CLE /  2.0 Ethics (pending)

Cost:
$50 MCBA members
$90 non-MCBA members

Go to mcbasocialmediacle.eventbrite.com to register online.

Location: Barnes & Thornburg Auditorium
11 S. Meridian St., Indianapolis 46204

Provider: Marion County Bar Association

Contact information:
Andrea Ciobanu
(317) 495-1090
aciobanu@ciobanulaw.com
www.mcbaindy.org
 

Back to Events
Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Indiana State Bar Association

Indianapolis Bar Association

Evansville Bar Association

Allen County Bar Association

Indiana Lawyer on Facebook

facebook
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. Hail to our Constitutional Law Expert in the Executive Office! “What you’re not paying attention to is the fact that I just took an action to change the law,” Obama said.

  2. What is this, the Ind Supreme Court thinking that there is a separation of powers and limited enumerated powers as delegated by a dusty old document? Such eighteen century thinking, so rare and unwanted by the elites in this modern age. Dictate to us, dictate over us, the massess are chanting! George Soros agrees. Time to change with times Ind Supreme Court, says all President Snows. Rule by executive decree is the new black.

  3. I made the same argument before a commission of the Indiana Supreme Court and then to the fedeal district and federal appellate courts. Fell flat. So very glad to read that some judges still beleive that evidentiary foundations matter.

  4. KUDOS to the Indiana Supreme Court for realizing that some bureacracies need to go to the stake. Recall what RWR said: "No government ever voluntarily reduces itself in size. Government programs, once launched, never disappear. Actually, a government bureau is the nearest thing to eternal life we'll ever see on this earth!" NOW ... what next to this rare and inspiring chopping block? Well, the Commission on Gender and Race (but not religion!?!) is way overdue. And some other Board's could be cut with a positive for State and the reputation of the Indiana judiciary.

  5. During a visit where an informant with police wears audio and video, does the video necessary have to show hand to hand transaction of money and narcotics?

ADVERTISEMENT