4/24 - Modern Lawyering Utilizing Social Media (Indianapolis)

Sponsored by
Back to TopPrintE-mail
Wednesday  April 24, 2013 

Program:
Social Media: First Amendment Implications and the Employment Context
      Moderator: Andrea Ciobanu, Ciobanu Law, PC
      Panelists:
      Kenneth J. Falk, Legal Director, ACLU of Indiana
      Linda Calvin, former Social Media Manager for Dow
      Jessica Tucker Ballard, Clerk, Indiana Court of Appeals

Utilizing Social Media Ethically
      Moderator: The Hon. James S. Kirsch, Indiana Court of Appeals
      Panelists: 
      Hon. Paul D. Mathias, Indiana Court of Appeals
      Hon. Melissa S. May, Indiana Court of Appeals
      G. Michael Witte, Indiana Disciplinary Commission
      Jaime Lira, Marketing Manager, Cohen & Malad

Litigation and Discovery: How to get Social Media Evidence in and Keep it in
      Moderator:  Jimmie McMillian, Barnes & Thornburg, LLP
      Panelists: 
      Hon. Tanya Walton Pratt, Southern District of Indiana
      Hon. David Shaheed, Marion County Superior Court
      Hon. David Hooper, Commissioner, Marion County Superior Court

Date: Wednesday, April 24, 2013
Time (local time): 2:00 - 5:00 pm
Reception follows program

Credit hours: 3.0 CLE /  2.0 Ethics (pending)

Cost:
$50 MCBA members
$90 non-MCBA members

Go to mcbasocialmediacle.eventbrite.com to register online.

Location: Barnes & Thornburg Auditorium
11 S. Meridian St., Indianapolis 46204

Provider: Marion County Bar Association

Contact information:
Andrea Ciobanu
(317) 495-1090
aciobanu@ciobanulaw.com
www.mcbaindy.org
 

Back to Events
Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. CCHP's real accomplishment is the 2015 law signed by Gov Pence that basically outlaws any annexation that is forced where a 65% majority of landowners in the affected area disagree. Regardless of whether HP wins or loses, the citizens of Indiana will not have another fiasco like this. The law Gov Pence signed is a direct result of this malgovernance.

  2. I gave tempparry guardship to a friend of my granddaughter in 2012. I went to prison. I had custody. My daughter went to prison to. We are out. My daughter gave me custody but can get her back. She was not order to give me custody . but now we want granddaughter back from friend. She's 14 now. What rights do we have

  3. This sure is not what most who value good governance consider the Rule of Law to entail: "In a letter dated March 2, which Brizzi forwarded to IBJ, the commission dismissed the grievance “on grounds that there is not reasonable cause to believe that you are guilty of misconduct.”" Yet two month later reasonable cause does exist? (Or is the commission forging ahead, the need for reasonable belief be damned? -- A seeming violation of the Rules of Profession Ethics on the part of the commission) Could the rule of law theory cause one to believe that an explanation is in order? Could it be that Hoosier attorneys live under Imperial Law (which is also a t-word that rhymes with infamy) in which the Platonic guardians can do no wrong and never owe the plebeian class any explanation for their powerful actions. (Might makes it right?) Could this be a case of politics directing the commission, as celebrated IU Mauer Professor (the late) Patrick Baude warned was happening 20 years ago in his controversial (whisteblowing) ethics lecture on a quite similar topic: http://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1498&context=ilj

  4. I have a case presently pending cert review before the SCOTUS that reveals just how Indiana regulates the bar. I have been denied licensure for life for holding the wrong views and questioning the grand inquisitors as to their duties as to state and federal constitutional due process. True story: https://www.scribd.com/doc/299040839/2016Petitionforcert-to-SCOTUS Shorter, Amici brief serving to frame issue as misuse of govt licensure: https://www.scribd.com/doc/312841269/Thomas-More-Society-Amicus-Brown-v-Ind-Bd-of-Law-Examiners

  5. Here's an idea...how about we MORE heavily regulate the law schools to reduce the surplus of graduates, driving starting salaries up for those new grads, so that we can all pay our insane amount of student loans off in a reasonable amount of time and then be able to afford to do pro bono & low-fee work? I've got friends in other industries, radiology for example, and their schools accept a very limited number of students so there will never be a glut of new grads and everyone's pay stays high. For example, my radiologist friend's school accepted just six new students per year.

ADVERTISEMENT