5/10 - Dead, Disappeared, Disabled, Disbarred: Ethical Application of the Attorney Surrogate Rule (Indianapolis)

Sponsored by
Back to TopPrintE-mail
Friday  May 10, 2013 

This program addresses what the legal community needs to know about the attorney surrogate rule. You will gain a better understanding of the rule, why to designate your own surrogate and what is required of an attorney surrogate.  Round table exercises used to close the program give attendees an opportunity to suggest improvements to the current process and help shape future reform.

Speakers:
  - Hon. Stephen R. Heimann, Circuit Court Judge, Bartholomew County
  - Julie Ann Newhouse, Newhouse & Newhouse
  - David Remondini, Chief Deputy Executive Director, Div. of State Court Admin.
  - Shelice R. Tolbert, Partner, Kopka Pinkus Dolin & Eads
  - Ted A. Waggoner, Partner, Peterson, Waggoner & Perkins, LLP

Who should attend?
  - Practitioners who may designate an attorney surrogate
  - Judges who appoint attorney surrogates
  - Senior Judges who can get senior judge credit serving as an attorney surrogate
  - Lawyers who may serve as attorney surrogates
  - Interested parties who can petition the court for an attorney surrogate
  - Legal staff who assist in these situation
  - JLAP supporters

Date: Friday, May 10, 2013
Time (local time): 1:00 - 4:30 pm

Credit: 3.0 CLE / Ethics Hours

Cost:
$100 (includes electronic links to all materials)
$20 Attorney Surrogate Manuel (limited number of hard copies available)

Location:
30 S. Meridian St., Eighth Floor, Indianapolis 46204

Provider:
Co-sponsord by the Judges & Lawyers Assistance Program (JLAP)
Special Committee on Attorney Surrogate Rule
Indiana State Bar Assocation (ISBA)

Contact Information:
Indiana State Bar Association
(317) 639-5465 or Toll Free (800)-266-2581
sallen@inbar.org
www.inbar.org, click under events for registration and additional information
 

Back to Events
Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Indiana State Bar Association

Indianapolis Bar Association

Evansville Bar Association

Allen County Bar Association

Indiana Lawyer on Facebook

facebook
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. I need an experienced attorney to handle a breach of contract matter. Kindly respond for more details. Graham Young

  2. I thought the slurs were the least grave aspects of her misconduct, since they had nothing to do with her being on the bench. Why then do I suspect they were the focus? I find this a troubling trend. At least she was allowed to keep her law license.

  3. Section 6 of Article I of the Indiana Constitution is pretty clear and unequivocal: "Section 6. No money shall be drawn from the treasury for the benefit of any religious or theological institution."

  4. Video pen? Nice work, "JW"! Let this be a lesson and a caution to all disgruntled ex-spouses (or soon-to-be ex-spouses) . . . you may think that altercation is going to get you some satisfaction . . . it will not.

  5. First comment on this thread is a fitting final comment on this thread, as that the MCBA never answered Duncan's fine question, and now even Eric Holder agrees that the MCBA was in material error as to the facts: "I don't get it" from Duncan December 1, 2014 5:10 PM "The Grand Jury met for 25 days and heard 70 hours of testimony according to this article and they made a decision that no crime occurred. On what basis does the MCBA conclude that their decision was "unjust"? What special knowledge or evidence does the MCBA have that the Grand Jury hearing this matter was unaware of? The system that we as lawyers are sworn to uphold made a decision that there was insufficient proof that officer committed a crime. How can any of us say we know better what was right than the jury that actually heard all of the the evidence in this case."

ADVERTISEMENT