5/10 - Dead, Disappeared, Disabled, Disbarred: Ethical Application of the Attorney Surrogate Rule (Indianapolis)

Sponsored by
Back to TopPrintE-mail
Friday  May 10, 2013 

This program addresses what the legal community needs to know about the attorney surrogate rule. You will gain a better understanding of the rule, why to designate your own surrogate and what is required of an attorney surrogate.  Round table exercises used to close the program give attendees an opportunity to suggest improvements to the current process and help shape future reform.

Speakers:
  - Hon. Stephen R. Heimann, Circuit Court Judge, Bartholomew County
  - Julie Ann Newhouse, Newhouse & Newhouse
  - David Remondini, Chief Deputy Executive Director, Div. of State Court Admin.
  - Shelice R. Tolbert, Partner, Kopka Pinkus Dolin & Eads
  - Ted A. Waggoner, Partner, Peterson, Waggoner & Perkins, LLP

Who should attend?
  - Practitioners who may designate an attorney surrogate
  - Judges who appoint attorney surrogates
  - Senior Judges who can get senior judge credit serving as an attorney surrogate
  - Lawyers who may serve as attorney surrogates
  - Interested parties who can petition the court for an attorney surrogate
  - Legal staff who assist in these situation
  - JLAP supporters

Date: Friday, May 10, 2013
Time (local time): 1:00 - 4:30 pm

Credit: 3.0 CLE / Ethics Hours

Cost:
$100 (includes electronic links to all materials)
$20 Attorney Surrogate Manuel (limited number of hard copies available)

Location:
30 S. Meridian St., Eighth Floor, Indianapolis 46204

Provider:
Co-sponsord by the Judges & Lawyers Assistance Program (JLAP)
Special Committee on Attorney Surrogate Rule
Indiana State Bar Assocation (ISBA)

Contact Information:
Indiana State Bar Association
(317) 639-5465 or Toll Free (800)-266-2581
sallen@inbar.org
www.inbar.org, click under events for registration and additional information
 

Back to Events
Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. Bob Stochel was opposing counsel to me in several federal cases (including a jury trial before Judge Tinder) here in SDIN. He is a very competent defense and trial lawyer who knows federal civil procedure and consumer law quite well. Bob gave us a run for our money when he appeared on a case.

  2. Awesome, Brian! Very proud of you and proud to have you as a partner!

  3. Oh, the name calling was not name calling, it was merely social commentary making this point, which is on the minds of many, as an aside to the article's focus: https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20100111082327AAmlmMa Or, if you prefer a local angle, I give you exhibit A in that analysis of viva la difference: http://fox59.com/2015/03/16/moed-appears-on-house-floor-says-hes-not-resigning/

  4. Too many attorneys take their position as a license to intimidate and threaten non attorneys in person and by mail. Did find it ironic that a reader moved to comment twice on this article could not complete a paragraph without resorting to insulting name calling (rethuglican) as a substitute for reasoned discussion. Some people will never get the point this action should have made.

  5. People have heard of Magna Carta, and not the Provisions of Oxford & Westminster. Not that anybody really cares. Today, it might be considered ethnic or racial bias to talk about the "Anglo Saxon common law." I don't even see the word English in the blurb above. Anyhow speaking of Edward I-- he was famously intolerant of diversity himself viz the Edict of Expulsion 1290. So all he did too like making parliament a permanent institution-- that all must be discredited. 100 years from now such commemorations will be in the dustbin of history.

ADVERTISEMENT