6/18 - Portability and the American Taxpayer Relief Act (Fort Wayne)

Sponsored by
Back to TopPrintE-mail
Tuesday  June 18, 2013 

Speakers:
  - Damian Gosheff, Faegre Baker Daniels

Program:
Some of the key considerations of Portability that will be discussed:
  - Portability of a spouse’s unused exemption to the other spouse.
  - What happens when a spouse dies and did not use their full exemption amount?
  - Is a predeceased spouse’s unused GST exemption portable?
  - Using cautious planning now that Portability is permanent.
  - Portability protection for taxpayers who have failed to plan vs. well thought out estate plan.

Date: Tuesday, June 18, 2013
Time:
Registration & buffet lunch: noon - 12:30 pm
Program: 12:30 - 1:30 pm

Credit hours: 1.0 CLE

Cost:
$45 ACBA Members
$60 Non‐ACBA members

Reservations must be received by 4:00 p.m. Wednesday, June 12, 2013.
Reservations received after the deadline and walk-ins will be accepted on a space available basis with an additional $10 charge; meal and materials may not be provided.

Location:
Allen County Bar Association, 924 South Calhoun St., Fort Wayne 46802

Provider:
Allen County Bar Association

Contact Information:
Allen County Bar Association
Phone (260) 423-2359
www.allencountybar.org

 

Back to Events
Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Indiana State Bar Association

Indianapolis Bar Association

Evansville Bar Association

Allen County Bar Association

Indiana Lawyer on Facebook

facebook
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. I need an experienced attorney to handle a breach of contract matter. Kindly respond for more details. Graham Young

  2. I thought the slurs were the least grave aspects of her misconduct, since they had nothing to do with her being on the bench. Why then do I suspect they were the focus? I find this a troubling trend. At least she was allowed to keep her law license.

  3. Section 6 of Article I of the Indiana Constitution is pretty clear and unequivocal: "Section 6. No money shall be drawn from the treasury for the benefit of any religious or theological institution."

  4. Video pen? Nice work, "JW"! Let this be a lesson and a caution to all disgruntled ex-spouses (or soon-to-be ex-spouses) . . . you may think that altercation is going to get you some satisfaction . . . it will not.

  5. First comment on this thread is a fitting final comment on this thread, as that the MCBA never answered Duncan's fine question, and now even Eric Holder agrees that the MCBA was in material error as to the facts: "I don't get it" from Duncan December 1, 2014 5:10 PM "The Grand Jury met for 25 days and heard 70 hours of testimony according to this article and they made a decision that no crime occurred. On what basis does the MCBA conclude that their decision was "unjust"? What special knowledge or evidence does the MCBA have that the Grand Jury hearing this matter was unaware of? The system that we as lawyers are sworn to uphold made a decision that there was insufficient proof that officer committed a crime. How can any of us say we know better what was right than the jury that actually heard all of the the evidence in this case."

ADVERTISEMENT