7/1 - Repeal of the Indiana Inheritance Tax: What You Need to Know (Fort Wayne)

Sponsored by
Back to TopPrintE-mail
Monday  July 1, 2013 

  - How will the new law be implemented procedurally in the Allen Superior Court?
  - How will this affect the procedures of the Allen County Assessor's office?
  - How will this affect your probate practice?
  - How will this change impact Personal Representatives, Trustees, and Beneficiaries of Trusts and Estates

Speakers:
  - Mag. Phillip E. Houk, Allen Superior Court
  - Benjamin S.J. Williams, Shambaugh Kast Beck & Williams
  - John Swihart, Inheritance Tax Deputy, Allen County Assessor’s Office

Date: Monday, July 1, 2013
Time:
Registration & buffet lunch: noon - 12:30 pm
Program: 12:30 - 1:30 pm

Credit hours: 1.0 CLE

Cost:
$45 ACBA members
$60 non-ACBA members

Attendance Limited to 40.
Reservations must be received by 4:00 p.m. Tuesday, June 25, 2013.
Reservations received after the deadline and walk-ins will be accepted on a space available basis with an additional $10 charge; meal and materials may not be provided.

Location:
Allen County Bar Association, 924 South Calhoun St., Fort Wayne 46802

Provider:
Allen County Bar Association

Contact Information:
Allen County Bar Association
Phone (260) 423-2359
www.allencountybar.org

 

Back to Events
Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Indiana State Bar Association

Indianapolis Bar Association

Evansville Bar Association

Allen County Bar Association

Indiana Lawyer on Facebook

facebook
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. KUDOS to the Indiana Supreme Court for realizing that some bureacracies need to go to the stake. Recall what RWR said: "No government ever voluntarily reduces itself in size. Government programs, once launched, never disappear. Actually, a government bureau is the nearest thing to eternal life we'll ever see on this earth!" NOW ... what next to this rare and inspiring chopping block? Well, the Commission on Gender and Race (but not religion!?!) is way overdue. And some other Board's could be cut with a positive for State and the reputation of the Indiana judiciary.

  2. During a visit where an informant with police wears audio and video, does the video necessary have to show hand to hand transaction of money and narcotics?

  3. I will agree with that as soon as law schools stop lying to prospective students about salaries and employment opportunities in the legal profession. There is no defense to the fraudulent numbers first year salaries they post to mislead people into going to law school.

  4. The sad thing is that no fish were thrown overboard The "greenhorn" who had never fished before those 5 days was interrogated for over 4 hours by 5 officers until his statement was illicited, "I don't want to go to prison....." The truth is that these fish were measured frozen off shore and thawed on shore. The FWC (state) officer did not know fish shrink, so the only reason that these fish could be bigger was a swap. There is no difference between a 19 1/2 fish or 19 3/4 fish, short fish is short fish, the ticket was written. In addition the FWC officer testified at trial, he does not measure fish in accordance with federal law. There was a document prepared by the FWC expert that said yes, fish shrink and if these had been measured correctly they averaged over 20 inches (offshore frozen). This was a smoke and mirror prosecution.

  5. I love this, Dave! Many congrats to you! We've come a long way from studying for the bar together! :)

ADVERTISEMENT