8/1 - Repeal of the Indiana Inheritance Tax: What You Need to Know (Fort Wayne)

Sponsored by
Back to TopPrintE-mail
Thursday  August 1, 2013 

VIDEO REPLAY

Speakers:
  - Mag. Phillip E. Houk, Allen Superior Court
  - Benjamin S.J. Williams, Shambaugh Kast Beck & Williams
  - John Swihart, Inheritance Tax Deputy, Allen County Assessor’s Office

Date: Thursday, August 1, 2013
Time:
Registration & light lunch: 11:45 am - noon
Program: noon - 1:00 pm

Credit hours: 1.0 CLE
If you attended this program on 7/01/2013 you would not be eligible to get CLE for this program.

Cost:
$45 ACBA Members
$60 Non-ACBA Members

Attendance Limited to 40. Reservations must be received by 4:00 p.m. Tuesday, July 30, 2013.
Reservations received after the deadline and walk-ins will be accepted on a space available basis with an additional $10 charge; meal and materials may not be provided.

Location:
Allen County Bar Association, 924 South Calhoun St., Fort Wayne 46802

Provider:
Allen County Bar Association

Contact Information:
Allen County Bar Association
Phone (260) 423-2359
www.allencountybar.org

 

Back to Events
Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Indiana State Bar Association

Indianapolis Bar Association

Evansville Bar Association

Allen County Bar Association

Indiana Lawyer on Facebook

facebook
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. Such things are no more elections than those in the late, unlamented Soviet Union.

  2. It appears the police and prosecutors are allowed to change the rules halfway through the game to suit themselves. I am surprised that the congress has not yet eliminated the right to a trial in cases involving any type of forensic evidence. That would suit their foolish law and order police state views. I say we eliminate the statute of limitations for crimes committed by members of congress and other government employees. Of course they would never do that. They are all corrupt cowards!!!

  3. Poor Judge Brown probably thought that by slavishly serving the godz of the age her violations of 18th century concepts like due process and the rule of law would be overlooked. Mayhaps she was merely a Judge ahead of her time?

  4. in a lawyer discipline case Judge Brown, now removed, was presiding over a hearing about a lawyer accused of the supposedly heinous ethical violation of saying the words "Illegal immigrant." (IN re Barker) http://www.in.gov/judiciary/files/order-discipline-2013-55S00-1008-DI-429.pdf .... I wonder if when we compare the egregious violations of due process by Judge Brown, to her chiding of another lawyer for politically incorrectness, if there are any conclusions to be drawn about what kind of person, what kind of judge, what kind of apparatchik, is busy implementing the agenda of political correctness and making off-limits legit advocacy about an adverse party in a suit whose illegal alien status is relevant? I am just asking the question, the reader can make own conclsuion. Oh wait-- did I use the wrong adjective-- let me rephrase that, um undocumented alien?

  5. of course the bigger questions of whether or not the people want to pay for ANY bussing is off limits, due to the Supreme Court protecting the people from DEMOCRACY. Several decades hence from desegregation and bussing plans and we STILL need to be taking all this taxpayer money to combat mostly-imagined "discrimination" in the most obviously failed social program of the postwar period.

ADVERTISEMENT