10/23-24 - Hot Topics for Indiana Lawyers (Fort Wayne)

Sponsored by
Back to TopPrintE-mail
Wednesday  October 23, 2013  Thursday  October 24, 2013 


Date: Wednesday, October 23 - Thursday, October 24, 2013
Time: 8:30 am - 4:30 pm each day

Credit hours: 12.0 CLE /1.0 Ethics

Cost:
2-Day Registration
Attorneys/Judges
   $400 ACBA members
   $450 Non-members
Non-Attorneys
   $275 ACBA members
   $325 Non-members

1-Day Registration
Attorneys/Judges
   $250 ACBA members
   $300 Non-members
Non-Attorneys
   $175 ACBA members
   $200 Non-members

Reservation deadline is Wednesday, October 16, 2013

Location:
Grand Wayne Center, 120 W. Jefferson Blvd., Fort Wayne 46802

Provider:
Allen County Bar Association

Contact Information:
Allen County Bar Association
Phone (260) 423-2359
www.allencountybar.org

 

Back to Events
Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Indiana State Bar Association

Indianapolis Bar Association

Evansville Bar Association

Allen County Bar Association

Indiana Lawyer on Facebook

facebook
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. I need an experienced attorney to handle a breach of contract matter. Kindly respond for more details. Graham Young

  2. I thought the slurs were the least grave aspects of her misconduct, since they had nothing to do with her being on the bench. Why then do I suspect they were the focus? I find this a troubling trend. At least she was allowed to keep her law license.

  3. Section 6 of Article I of the Indiana Constitution is pretty clear and unequivocal: "Section 6. No money shall be drawn from the treasury for the benefit of any religious or theological institution."

  4. Video pen? Nice work, "JW"! Let this be a lesson and a caution to all disgruntled ex-spouses (or soon-to-be ex-spouses) . . . you may think that altercation is going to get you some satisfaction . . . it will not.

  5. First comment on this thread is a fitting final comment on this thread, as that the MCBA never answered Duncan's fine question, and now even Eric Holder agrees that the MCBA was in material error as to the facts: "I don't get it" from Duncan December 1, 2014 5:10 PM "The Grand Jury met for 25 days and heard 70 hours of testimony according to this article and they made a decision that no crime occurred. On what basis does the MCBA conclude that their decision was "unjust"? What special knowledge or evidence does the MCBA have that the Grand Jury hearing this matter was unaware of? The system that we as lawyers are sworn to uphold made a decision that there was insufficient proof that officer committed a crime. How can any of us say we know better what was right than the jury that actually heard all of the the evidence in this case."

ADVERTISEMENT