9/11 - Lawyers for Soldiers (Indianapolis)

Sponsored by
Back to TopPrintE-mail
Wednesday  September 11, 2013 

Program:
Introduction to Veterans Benefits
   - Andrew R. Rutz, Attorney, Bosley & Bratch
Overview of Re-employment Rights Found in USERRA
   - J. Thomas Parker, Chief of Staff, Indiana Prosecuting Attorneys Council
Family Law as it Relates to Military Families
   - LTC Steven F. Fillenwarth, Principal, Fillenwarth & Stolle, LLC
Veterans’ Courts
   - Hon. Maria D. Granger, Judge, Floyd Superior Court #3
   - Eric L. Dungan, LCSW, Coordinator, Vets Justice Outreach
Consumer Law Protections in the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act (SCRA)
   - Terry Tolliver, Deputy Director, Consumer Protection Division Office of the Indiana Attorney General
Estate Planning for Military Families
   - Capt. Kenneth D. Washington, US Army/IN National Guard
   - MAJ Kevin M. Alerding, Partner, Ice Miller LLP
Ethical Considerations When Representing Military Personnel
   - Jeffrey S. Nickloy, Partner, Nickloy & Higdon
   - J. Alexander Nickloy, Partner, Nickloy & Higdon

More details and registration

Date: Wednesday, September 11, 2013
Time (local time): 8:30 am - 4:45 pm

Credit: 6.75 CLE / 1.0 Ethics

Cost: Price includes continental breakfast & lunch
$45 plus commitment to take one pro bono case from Indiana Lawyers for Soldiers
$245 - no further obligation

Location: Regions Bank Conference Center
One Indaina Square, 5th Floor, Indianapolis 46204

Provider: Indiana State Bar Assocation (ISBA)
Co-Sponsored by Military & Veteran's Affairs Committee & Pro Bono Committe

Contact Information:
Indiana State Bar Association
(317) 639-5465 or Toll Free (800)-266-2581
sallen@inbar.org
www.inbar.org, click under events for registration and additional information
 

Back to Events
Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. Major social engineering imposed by judicial order well in advance of democratic change, has been the story of the whole post ww2 period. Contraception, desegregation, abortion, gay marriage: all rammed down the throats of Americans who didn't vote to change existing laws on any such thing, by the unelected lifetime tenure Supreme court heirarchs. Maybe people came to accept those things once imposed upon them, but, that's accommodation not acceptance; and surely not democracy. So let's quit lying to the kids telling them this is a democracy. Some sort of oligarchy, but no democracy that's for sure, and it never was. A bourgeois republic from day one.

  2. JD Massur, yes, brings to mind a similar stand at a Texas Mission in 1836. Or Vladivostok in 1918. As you seemingly gloat, to the victors go the spoils ... let the looting begin, right?

  3. I always wondered why high fence deer hunting was frowned upon? I guess you need to keep the population steady. If you don't, no one can enjoy hunting! Thanks for the post! Fence

  4. Whether you support "gay marriage" or not is not the issue. The issue is whether the SCOTUS can extract from an unmentionable somewhere the notion that the Constitution forbids government "interference" in the "right" to marry. Just imagine time-traveling to Philadelphia in 1787. Ask James Madison if the document he and his fellows just wrote allowed him- or forbade government to "interfere" with- his "right" to marry George Washington? He would have immediately- and justly- summoned the Sergeant-at-Arms to throw your sorry self out into the street. Far from being a day of liberation, this is a day of capitulation by the Rule of Law to the Rule of What's Happening Now.

  5. With today's ruling, AG Zoeller's arguments in the cases of Obamacare and Same-sex Marriage can be relegated to the ash heap of history. 0-fer

ADVERTISEMENT