11/6 - At the Intersection of Family Law & Estate Planning (Indianapolis)

Sponsored by
Back to TopPrintE-mail
Wednesday  November 6, 2013 
12:59 AM  EST

Speakers:
  - James Reed, Bingham Greenebaum Doll LLP - Chair & Moderator
  - Amanda Krenson, Bingham Greenebaum Doll LLP
  - Margaret Christensen, Bingham Greenebaum Doll LLP

This seminar will walk through assorted marriage dissolution scenarios from the time that the petition is filed until the Decree is issued, and examine each from an estate planning perspective, a matrimonial law perspective, and an ethics perspective.
Topics to be addressed will include:
  - What estate planning changes should a client consider if he or she believes a divorce is imminent?
  - Can I represent one party to a divorce if I previously represented the couple in creating their joint estate plan?
  - Does a standard Trial Rule 65(E) divorce restraining order on transferring assets prevent my client from revising his or her estate plan?
  - What new estate planning documents are appropriate to implement once a divorce has been filed?

Date: Wednesday, November 6, 2013
Time (local time):
Registration: 12:30 - 1:00 pm
Program: 1:00 - 3:15 pm

Credit hours: 2.0 CLE / 1.0 Ethics

Cost:
$89 Attendee
($79 Early Bird rate for attendees is available through October 10)

$79 Government Employees & Paralegals

Go to www.TheIndianaLawyer.com/events to register online.

RSVP by October 30

Location: Bingham Greenebaum Doll LLP
10 W. Market St., 2700 Market Tower, Indianapolis 46204

Provider: Indiana Lawyer
Presented in Partnership with Bingham Greenebaum Doll

Contact information:
Karen Aruta
(317) 472-5201
karuta@ibj.com
www.TheIndianaLawyer.com/events

Back to Events
Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Indiana State Bar Association

Indianapolis Bar Association

Evansville Bar Association

Allen County Bar Association

Indiana Lawyer on Facebook

facebook
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. KUDOS to the Indiana Supreme Court for realizing that some bureacracies need to go to the stake. Recall what RWR said: "No government ever voluntarily reduces itself in size. Government programs, once launched, never disappear. Actually, a government bureau is the nearest thing to eternal life we'll ever see on this earth!" NOW ... what next to this rare and inspiring chopping block? Well, the Commission on Gender and Race (but not religion!?!) is way overdue. And some other Board's could be cut with a positive for State and the reputation of the Indiana judiciary.

  2. During a visit where an informant with police wears audio and video, does the video necessary have to show hand to hand transaction of money and narcotics?

  3. I will agree with that as soon as law schools stop lying to prospective students about salaries and employment opportunities in the legal profession. There is no defense to the fraudulent numbers first year salaries they post to mislead people into going to law school.

  4. The sad thing is that no fish were thrown overboard The "greenhorn" who had never fished before those 5 days was interrogated for over 4 hours by 5 officers until his statement was illicited, "I don't want to go to prison....." The truth is that these fish were measured frozen off shore and thawed on shore. The FWC (state) officer did not know fish shrink, so the only reason that these fish could be bigger was a swap. There is no difference between a 19 1/2 fish or 19 3/4 fish, short fish is short fish, the ticket was written. In addition the FWC officer testified at trial, he does not measure fish in accordance with federal law. There was a document prepared by the FWC expert that said yes, fish shrink and if these had been measured correctly they averaged over 20 inches (offshore frozen). This was a smoke and mirror prosecution.

  5. I love this, Dave! Many congrats to you! We've come a long way from studying for the bar together! :)

ADVERTISEMENT