12/4 - The Future of the Courts & Legal Profession: A Statewide Bench-Bar Symposium

Sponsored by
Back to TopPrintE-mail
Wednesday  December 4, 2013 
8:45 AM  EST

Date: Wednesday, Dec. 4, 2013
Time (local time): 8:45 a.m.  to 4 p.m.

Credit: 4.8 hrs. CLE/1.3 hrs. Ethics

Cost:
$135 ISBA members
$225 non-ISBA members

Location: JW Marriott, Indianapolis

Provider: Indiana State Bar Assocation (ISBA)

More Details: The Indiana State Bar and the Indiana Judicial Center have joined forces to develop a program of interest to both judicial officers and attorneys. Breakout sessions will address emerging technologies, future of civil and criminal law in Indiana, managing unconscious bias, outlook for legal education and so much more! You can earn up to 4.8 hours of CLE (to include 1.3 hours of Ethics). Note: On the evening before the conference, Tuesday, Dec. 3, the Young Lawyers Section will host its annual Judicial Reception at the JW Marriott from 5 to 7 p.m.
A block of rooms at the JW Marriott for Dec. 3 is available to members attending the Statewide Bench-Bar Symposium on Dec. 4. To take advantage of the special ISBA room rate of $149, call 1.866.704.6162 with the group code "ISBA" or reserve your room online at http://tinyurl.com/JW-ISBA-room-reservation-Dec-3. Please note: The cut-off date for this special rate has been extended to Nov. 25, so make your reservation now! Visit www.inbar.org for more information.

Contact Information:
Indiana State Bar Association
(317) 639-5465 or Toll Free (800)-266-2581
clong@inbar.org
www.inbar.org, click under events for registration and additional information
 

Back to Events
Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. Just an aside, but regardless of the outcome, I 'm proud of Judge William Hughes. He was the original magistrate on the Home place issue. He ruled for Home Place, and was primaried by Brainard for it. Their tool Poindexter failed to unseat Hughes, who won support for his honesty and courage throughout the county, and he was reelected Judge of Hamilton County's Superior Court. You can still stand for something and survive. Thanks, Judge Hughes!

  2. CCHP's real accomplishment is the 2015 law signed by Gov Pence that basically outlaws any annexation that is forced where a 65% majority of landowners in the affected area disagree. Regardless of whether HP wins or loses, the citizens of Indiana will not have another fiasco like this. The law Gov Pence signed is a direct result of this malgovernance.

  3. I gave tempparry guardship to a friend of my granddaughter in 2012. I went to prison. I had custody. My daughter went to prison to. We are out. My daughter gave me custody but can get her back. She was not order to give me custody . but now we want granddaughter back from friend. She's 14 now. What rights do we have

  4. This sure is not what most who value good governance consider the Rule of Law to entail: "In a letter dated March 2, which Brizzi forwarded to IBJ, the commission dismissed the grievance “on grounds that there is not reasonable cause to believe that you are guilty of misconduct.”" Yet two month later reasonable cause does exist? (Or is the commission forging ahead, the need for reasonable belief be damned? -- A seeming violation of the Rules of Profession Ethics on the part of the commission) Could the rule of law theory cause one to believe that an explanation is in order? Could it be that Hoosier attorneys live under Imperial Law (which is also a t-word that rhymes with infamy) in which the Platonic guardians can do no wrong and never owe the plebeian class any explanation for their powerful actions. (Might makes it right?) Could this be a case of politics directing the commission, as celebrated IU Mauer Professor (the late) Patrick Baude warned was happening 20 years ago in his controversial (whisteblowing) ethics lecture on a quite similar topic: http://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1498&context=ilj

  5. I have a case presently pending cert review before the SCOTUS that reveals just how Indiana regulates the bar. I have been denied licensure for life for holding the wrong views and questioning the grand inquisitors as to their duties as to state and federal constitutional due process. True story: https://www.scribd.com/doc/299040839/2016Petitionforcert-to-SCOTUS Shorter, Amici brief serving to frame issue as misuse of govt licensure: https://www.scribd.com/doc/312841269/Thomas-More-Society-Amicus-Brown-v-Ind-Bd-of-Law-Examiners

ADVERTISEMENT