12/26 - 11th Hour Video Replays

Sponsored by
Back to TopPrintE-mail
Thursday  December 26, 2013 
8:30 AM  EST

All seminars include 1.0 General Credit unless otherwise noted.

8:30 to 9:30 a.m.   
2013 Business Law Skills Series: Negotiating Credit Agreements--Practical Tips for Borrower's Counsel  (8/21/2013)

9:45 to 10:45 a.m.   
2012 Litigation Trial Skills Series: Depositions (8/8/2012)

11 a.m. to Noon
Preview of Landmark Civil Rights Decisions from the U.S. Supreme Court (4/30/2013)

1 to 2 p.m.
2013 Litigation Trial Skills Series: Ethical Considerations During Trial & Trial Preparation (9/11/2013) (1.0 Ethics)

2:15 to 3:15 p.m.   
2013 Probate Practice Skills Series: Planning with Retirement Assets (10/23/2013)

3:30 to 4:30 p.m.
Recent Developments in Cyber Security and Data Protection Laws in the U.S. and Europe (10/16/2012)


No registration is required (walk-in registration only).
 

Date: Dec. 26
Time (local time): 8:30 a.m. - 4:30 p.m.

Credit hours:   General CLE

Cost: 
$30 IndyBar Members
$60 Non-Members
$10 IndyBar Law Student Members

Location:  Indianapolis Bar Association - IndyBar Education Center
135 N. Pennsylvania Street, Suite 1500, Indianapolis, 46204

Provider:  Indianapolis Bar Association

Contact information:
Indianapolis Bar Association
317-269-2000
iba@indybar.org
www.indybar.org and click on events to register

Back to Events
Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Indiana State Bar Association

Indianapolis Bar Association

Evansville Bar Association

Allen County Bar Association

Indiana Lawyer on Facebook

facebook
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. Such things are no more elections than those in the late, unlamented Soviet Union.

  2. It appears the police and prosecutors are allowed to change the rules halfway through the game to suit themselves. I am surprised that the congress has not yet eliminated the right to a trial in cases involving any type of forensic evidence. That would suit their foolish law and order police state views. I say we eliminate the statute of limitations for crimes committed by members of congress and other government employees. Of course they would never do that. They are all corrupt cowards!!!

  3. Poor Judge Brown probably thought that by slavishly serving the godz of the age her violations of 18th century concepts like due process and the rule of law would be overlooked. Mayhaps she was merely a Judge ahead of her time?

  4. in a lawyer discipline case Judge Brown, now removed, was presiding over a hearing about a lawyer accused of the supposedly heinous ethical violation of saying the words "Illegal immigrant." (IN re Barker) http://www.in.gov/judiciary/files/order-discipline-2013-55S00-1008-DI-429.pdf .... I wonder if when we compare the egregious violations of due process by Judge Brown, to her chiding of another lawyer for politically incorrectness, if there are any conclusions to be drawn about what kind of person, what kind of judge, what kind of apparatchik, is busy implementing the agenda of political correctness and making off-limits legit advocacy about an adverse party in a suit whose illegal alien status is relevant? I am just asking the question, the reader can make own conclsuion. Oh wait-- did I use the wrong adjective-- let me rephrase that, um undocumented alien?

  5. of course the bigger questions of whether or not the people want to pay for ANY bussing is off limits, due to the Supreme Court protecting the people from DEMOCRACY. Several decades hence from desegregation and bussing plans and we STILL need to be taking all this taxpayer money to combat mostly-imagined "discrimination" in the most obviously failed social program of the postwar period.

ADVERTISEMENT