ILNews

Close calls, complex cases highlight need for attorney surrogates

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

It was a very close call.

The situation began when an attorney walked into the courtroom of Floyd Circuit Judge J. Terrence Cody with a petition for a surrogate attorney and a box of client files. The attorney’s friend had left his solo law practice to seek out-of-state treatment for an illness.
 

cody Cody

A peek inside the files showed some clients were in jail, others had already paid money for services and some had court appearances scheduled. Because these clients had immediate needs and their attorney was essentially unavailable, Cody took the files and started calling local attorneys to enlist their help in taking over the cases.

Recounting the incident, Cody pointed out what he considered the blessing: the absent attorney handled only criminal cases. If the lawyer had a practice that covered a broad spectrum of legal matters, the process of sorting through the files and finding attorneys would have taken much longer, and clients would have been at risk for not getting proper representation.

Consequently, even though Cody circumvented the surrogate attorney process because of the urgency of the situation, he is adamant that surrogate attorneys are vital. The process ensures that clients of a lawyer who is no longer able to practice will be informed and given options instead of left wondering what to do.

“We have spread the gospel about the need for surrogate attorneys,” Cody said.

Enacted in 2008, the attorney surrogate rule in the Indiana Rules for Admission to the Bar and the Discipline of Attorneys spells out the process for designating another member of the bar to take over when a lawyer dies, becomes disabled, is suspended, disbarred or disappears.

At the time Rule 23, Section 27 was created, Indiana was among only a handful of states to have such language. The need for a court to appoint a surrogate arises only a few times each year, but when it does, the rule provides clear guidance on what to do.

Still, as Cody noted, attorneys have to be told about the rule. Five years after the provision took effect, Terry Harrell, executive director of the Indiana Judges and Lawyers Assistance Program, fields a handful of frantic phone calls every year from lawyers not knowing what to do when a colleague cannot continue to practice.


Terry Harrell mug Harrell

Ideally, attorneys in solo practice or in small firms with associates who have no fiduciary authority have a surrogate attorney named. They have a written agreement and add the surrogate attorney’s number to their registration. Then, in the event something happens, the court will not have to find a surrogate.

It is another form of estate planning, but Harrell said attorneys do not know about the rule or about how to name a surrogate because they do not want to contemplate unpleasant events.

“I think for the same reason people don’t have a will, you don’t like to think about it,” Harrell said. “You don’t want to think about not being there to serve your clients.”

Before and after the rule

Following the death of a sole practitioner in South Bend, the complexity of the cases he left behind caused the court to appoint three surrogates. The attorney handled primarily immigration cases, including deportation proceedings and applications for visas and green cards.

Retired Magistrate Judge David Ready was named one of the three under an amendment to the Indiana Administrative Rules that allows senior judges to serve as surrogates. The other two were practicing attorneys who are fluent in Spanish.


ready Ready

With no funds available to keep the deceased attorney’s office open, the trio loaded the files into about 18 Bankers Boxes and took them to the law library in the St. Joseph County Courthouse where the materials would be secure.

Next, the surrogates drafted a letter (one side in English and the other in Spanish) to notify the clients their attorney had died. The clients were also told the times they could come to the courthouse and claim their file.

Ready believes the process worked fairly well, although a few letters were returned and some records still have not been picked up.

Without the surrogates, he does not know what would have happened – maybe the attorney’s wife would have maintained the files in her home or turned them over to the county bar association.

Before the surrogate attorney rule, no formal process existed for protecting clients of an attorney who was no longer able to practice. Ted Waggoner, chair of the Indiana State Bar Association’s Attorney Surrogate Rule Special Committee, said traditionally the spouse might ask a good friend for help and judges would have to do what they thought was best.

The rule not only offers guidance but also includes the key provision of immunity. Absent intentional wrongdoing, the attorney will be protected from civil suits for all actions and omissions taken while a surrogate.

Ready has seen first hand the importance of surrogates, and he often asks attorneys if they have named a surrogate and directs them to read the rule.

“If the (Indiana) Supreme Court has not got around to making the appointment of surrogates mandatory, they probably ought to,” Ready said.

Not an easy job

The range of duties an attorney may undertake as a surrogate include examining the files and records of the law practice; filing notices, motions and pleadings on behalf of the client where jurisdictional time limits are involved; taking possession of all trust accounts and taking appropriate actions; and making referrals for replacement counsel or accepting representation of the client.

Waggoner conceded serving as a surrogate is not easy.

The surrogate may find the law practice in disarray and may have to deal with clients who are likely under strain because they have problems that require the help of a lawyer. On top of this, the surrogate will have obligations to his or her own practice.

Still, Waggoner, managing partner at Peterson Waggoner & Perkins LLP in Rochester, readily gives three reasons for becoming a surrogate attorney: it is the right thing to do; if money is available, the surrogate may get paid for his or her service; and the surrogate may have the opportunity to get new clients.


ted waggoner Waggoner

JLAP, along with the state bar association, will put the surrogate rule in the spotlight at a special CLE. The program, “Ethical Application of the Attorney Surrogate Rule,” will highlight the importance of designating a surrogate, the duties of the surrogate and how the current process for surrogate attorneys can be improved.

The CLE will be from 1 to 4:30 p.m. May 10 on the eighth floor of the Kite Building, 30 S. Meridian St., Indianapolis.

For more information call the ISBA at 317-639-5465.•

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. On a related note, I offered the ICLU my cases against the BLE repeatedly, and sought their amici aid repeatedly as well. Crickets. Usually not even a response. I am guessing they do not do allegations of anti-Christian bias? No matter how glaring? I have posted on other links the amicus brief that did get filed (search this ezine, e.g., Kansas attorney), read the Thomas More Society brief to note what the ACLU ran from like vampires from garlic. An Examiner pledged to advance diversity and inclusion came right out on the record and demanded that I choose Man's law or God's law. I wonder, had I been asked to swear off Allah ... what result then, ICLU? Had I been found of bad character and fitness for advocating sexual deviance, what result then ICLU? Had I been lifetime banned for posting left of center statements denigrating the US Constitution, what result ICLU? Hey, we all know don't we? Rather Biased.

  2. It was mentioned in the article that there have been numerous CLE events to train attorneys on e-filing. I would like someone to provide a list of those events, because I have not seen any such events in east central Indiana, and since Hamilton County is one of the counties where e-filing is mandatory, one would expect some instruction in this area. Come on, people, give some instruction, not just applause!

  3. This law is troubling in two respects: First, why wasn't the law reviewed "with the intention of getting all the facts surrounding the legislation and its actual impact on the marketplace" BEFORE it was passed and signed? Seems a bit backwards to me (even acknowledging that this is the Indiana state legislature we're talking about. Second, what is it with the laws in this state that seem to create artificial monopolies in various industries? Besides this one, the other law that comes to mind is the legislation that governed the granting of licenses to firms that wanted to set up craft distilleries. The licensing was limited to only those entities that were already in the craft beer brewing business. Republicans in this state talk a big game when it comes to being "business friendly". They're friendly alright . . . to certain businesses.

  4. Gretchen, Asia, Roberto, Tonia, Shannon, Cheri, Nicholas, Sondra, Carey, Laura ... my heart breaks for you, reaching out in a forum in which you are ignored by a professional suffering through both compassion fatigue and the love of filthy lucre. Most if not all of you seek a warm blooded Hoosier attorney unafraid to take on the government and plead that government officials have acted unconstitutionally to try to save a family and/or rescue children in need and/or press individual rights against the Leviathan state. I know an attorney from Kansas who has taken such cases across the country, arguing before half of the federal courts of appeal and presenting cases to the US S.Ct. numerous times seeking cert. Unfortunately, due to his zeal for the constitutional rights of peasants and willingness to confront powerful government bureaucrats seemingly violating the same ... he was denied character and fitness certification to join the Indiana bar, even after he was cleared to sit for, and passed, both the bar exam and ethics exam. And was even admitted to the Indiana federal bar! NOW KNOW THIS .... you will face headwinds and difficulties in locating a zealously motivated Hoosier attorney to face off against powerful government agents who violate the constitution, for those who do so tend to end up as marginalized as Paul Odgen, who was driven from the profession. So beware, many are mere expensive lapdogs, the kind of breed who will gladly take a large retainer, but then fail to press against the status quo and powers that be when told to heel to. It is a common belief among some in Indiana that those attorneys who truly fight the power and rigorously confront corruption often end up, actually or metaphorically, in real life or at least as to their careers, as dead as the late, great Gary Welch. All of that said, I wish you the very best in finding a Hoosier attorney with a fighting spirit to press your rights as far as you can, for you do have rights against government actors, no matter what said actors may tell you otherwise. Attorneys outside the elitist camp are often better fighters that those owing the powers that be for their salaries, corner offices and end of year bonuses. So do not be afraid to retain a green horn or unconnected lawyer, many of them are fine men and woman who are yet untainted by the "unique" Hoosier system.

  5. I am not the John below. He is a journalist and talk show host who knows me through my years working in Kansas government. I did no ask John to post the note below ...

ADVERTISEMENT